NCAA

[MrUtley]

Fuck you I already did.

I would think, the superior reader you tell us all that you are, that I wouldn't have to repeat myself.

Like I said, I tried my best to let bygones be bygones. But you just had to stir shit up and take another swipe to assuage your bruised ego.

Who really gives a rats ass anyways about its, it's, whatthefuckever. Okay you slammed Hammy over it. But leave me out of your incessant spellchecking grammer bullshit. In fact stop altogether, we get it already you are the greatest.

But I'm sure not taking any more shit from you pal. I can and will call you an asshole until the cows come home if need be. Don't think your will is any stronger than mine. Tit for tat is tedious but if that is what it takes then no prob.  Bro.

No, you didn't, you arrogant, bullying pile of Jose Mesa.  You purposefully got rid of the context - my responding to utley, nothing whatsoever to do with you - to make it look like I started it, rather than you.  That's what you do because your fragile ego - the same thing that makes you always declare yourself the sinner in arguments - cannot handle being responsible for dragging the shit storm with you.  There is a reason why every single one of these type of thigs involves you or utley, cap.  Utley does it for thrills, I suspect; you because you are a bullying, arrogant, idiot asshole at your very core of being.  Think about that for a while.

I do what for the "thrills"? Be clear, Steven, with your criticisms.

Thank you, again.

[whiskeypriest]

Jeeeeez - will someone just toss a gascan into this place and light a match!

NannyNag Shitface is responsible for the escalation Kid.

But I ain't mollycoddling that jerk anymore. Keep your heads down forumites and my apologies ahead of time.

What a lying piece of shit you are.  There's a reason you had to use bo's post here to pretend I started it up again: I did nothing to provoke it, once again.  I let it go, and you build it up again.  Because, of course, that's the way you are.  A lying, bullying, shit head.

That last line is a sentence fragment. Also, the word "shit head" is hyphenated. The colon after the word "again" fails to work, and should really be a period. Finally, the sentence "I did nothing to provoke it, once again", might be more powerful were it to say, "Once again, I did nothing to provoke it".

That's a matter of style, however.

I hope this helps, you develop as a writer, Steven.

The last two sentences were deliberate fragments, a stylistic choice that I recognized was not grammatically correct when I wrote them.  And that was supposed to be a semi-colon after again.  That's what I get for typing about my glasses.

Thank you for the correction on shit-head, though.  I will remember that.  It's "cap is a shit-head", not "cap is a shit head".  Roger that.

[whiskeypriest]

Fuck you I already did.

I would think, the superior reader you tell us all that you are, that I wouldn't have to repeat myself.

Like I said, I tried my best to let bygones be bygones. But you just had to stir shit up and take another swipe to assuage your bruised ego.

Who really gives a rats ass anyways about its, it's, whatthefuckever. Okay you slammed Hammy over it. But leave me out of your incessant spellchecking grammer bullshit. In fact stop altogether, we get it already you are the greatest.

But I'm sure not taking any more shit from you pal. I can and will call you an asshole until the cows come home if need be. Don't think your will is any stronger than mine. Tit for tat is tedious but if that is what it takes then no prob.  Bro.

No, you didn't, you arrogant, bullying pile of Jose Mesa.  You purposefully got rid of the context - my responding to utley, nothing whatsoever to do with you - to make it look like I started it, rather than you.  That's what you do because your fragile ego - the same thing that makes you always declare yourself the sinner in arguments - cannot handle being responsible for dragging the shit storm with you.  There is a reason why every single one of these type of thigs involves you or utley, cap.  Utley does it for thrills, I suspect; you because you are a bullying, arrogant, idiot asshole at your very core of being.  Think about that for a while.

I do what for the "thrills"? Be clear, Steven, with your criticisms.

Thank you, again.

You kick over hornets' nests for thrills.  Metaphorically.

[MrUtley]

Fuck you I already did.

I would think, the superior reader you tell us all that you are, that I wouldn't have to repeat myself.

Like I said, I tried my best to let bygones be bygones. But you just had to stir shit up and take another swipe to assuage your bruised ego.

Who really gives a rats ass anyways about its, it's, whatthefuckever. Okay you slammed Hammy over it. But leave me out of your incessant spellchecking grammer bullshit. In fact stop altogether, we get it already you are the greatest.

But I'm sure not taking any more shit from you pal. I can and will call you an asshole until the cows come home if need be. Don't think your will is any stronger than mine. Tit for tat is tedious but if that is what it takes then no prob.  Bro.

No, you didn't, you arrogant, bullying pile of Jose Mesa.  You purposefully got rid of the context - my responding to utley, nothing whatsoever to do with you - to make it look like I started it, rather than you.  That's what you do because your fragile ego - the same thing that makes you always declare yourself the sinner in arguments - cannot handle being responsible for dragging the shit storm with you.  There is a reason why every single one of these type of thigs involves you or utley, cap.  Utley does it for thrills, I suspect; you because you are a bullying, arrogant, idiot asshole at your very core of being.  Think about that for a while.

I do what for the "thrills"? Be clear, Steven, with your criticisms.

Thank you, again.

You kick over hornets' nests for thrills.  Metaphorically.

Stinging rebuke, Steven? Are you saying there's more agitation than revelation in my posts? Why, you cut me to the core, Steven!

Jeeeeez - will someone just toss a gascan into this place and light a match!

NannyNag Shitface is responsible for the escalation Kid.

But I ain't mollycoddling that jerk anymore. Keep your heads down forumites and my apologies ahead of time.

What a lying piece of shit you are.  There's a reason you had to use bo's post here to pretend I started it up again: I did nothing to provoke it, once again.  I let it go, and you build it up again.  Because, of course, that's the way you are.  A lying, bullying, shit head.

That last line is a sentence fragment. Also, the word "shit head" is hyphenated. The colon after the word "again" fails to work, and should really be a period. Finally, the sentence "I did nothing to provoke it, once again", might be more powerful were it to say, "Once again, I did nothing to provoke it".

That's a matter of style, however.

I hope this helps, you develop as a writer, Steven.

The last two sentences were deliberate fragments, a stylistic choice that I recognized was not grammatically correct when I wrote them.  And that was supposed to be a semi-colon after again.  That's what I get for typing about my glasses.

Thank you for the correction on shit-head, though.  I will remember that.  It's "cap is a shit-head", not "cap is a shit head".  Roger that.

All this talk of colons! I must schedule a colonoscopy. Not a sigmoidoscopy, as that is only a semi-colonoscopy.

[CaptainCargo]

Fuck you I already did.

I would think, the superior reader you tell us all that you are, that I wouldn't have to repeat myself.

Like I said, I tried my best to let bygones be bygones. But you just had to stir shit up and take another swipe to assuage your bruised ego.

Who really gives a rats ass anyways about its, it's, whatthefuckever. Okay you slammed Hammy over it. But leave me out of your incessant spellchecking grammer bullshit. In fact stop altogether, we get it already you are the greatest.

But I'm sure not taking any more shit from you pal. I can and will call you an asshole until the cows come home if need be. Don't think your will is any stronger than mine. Tit for tat is tedious but if that is what it takes then no prob.  Bro.

No, you didn't, you arrogant, bullying pile of Jose Mesa.  You purposefully got rid of the context - my responding to utley, nothing whatsoever to do with you - to make it look like I started it, rather than you.  That's what you do because your fragile ego - the same thing that makes you always declare yourself the sinner in arguments - cannot handle being responsible for dragging the shit storm with you.  There is a reason why every single one of these type of thigs involves you or utley, cap.  Utley does it for thrills, I suspect; you because you are a bullying, arrogant, idiot asshole at your very core of being.  Think about that for a while.

You blind fuck. I didn't get rid of anything.

You figured if you didn't mention my name personally I wouldn't know who you were talking about. Well I did.

Your solipsism is amazing.  It's not about you every time I correct the misuse of an apostrophe in forming the possessive of "it".  What a conceited little windbag you are!

Trust me, when I intend to insult you, you'll know about it.  And I cannot for the life of me figure out why you think I would want to take a dig at you without you knowing I was doing so.  What the fuck is the point of that?  I corrected ham on the apostrophe because he misused the apostrophe.  It had nothing to do with you and you know it.  You are just trying to justify your bullying shit storm.

You just couldn't resist your sillyass preening self. But you got called on it and slapped down for it. Serves you right and that is that.

Fuck your bullying bullshit BTW. It's your out, your crutch. It's all you've fucking got.

You are big on what psychologists call "projection".

Anyone that stands up to you, and doesn't bow down to your unquestionable genius must be a bully. Like I said it's all you got, besides your nitpick spellchecking that is. Yeah, for now it's me or Hammy. But as soon as someone else stands up to you they'll be included too I'm sure.

I don't nitpick or spell check (though I will note for this posts purposes that it is two words).  For the record, let's review something here.  You engaged in a series of posts in which you told me to shut the fuck up and bragged about how much more you knew about football than I did, and how you were smarter than I am.  You, however, committed the cardinal sin of anyone who makes that sort of argument: you didn't proof read.  If you want to pretend to be smarter than someone else, you cannot make a mistake in that kind of post, or you will get it handed out to you.  Which you did.  Instead of taking it like a man, you have been a dick about it on a pretty consistent basis ever since.  But I never expected more from you, because your bullying ego can not ever admit to being wrong, or in the wrong.

I do not seriously claim to be smarter than anyone here.  Never have.  I will admit to having a certain amount of specialized knowledge in certain areas, and where relevant will share it, but we all do that.  There are also a couple of things that are likely to periodically draw an exasperated response from me - "it's" being one of them, confusing "comprise" for a synonym for "constitute" is another.   But I do not claim to be smarter.  That's your gig.

I'll also note I have no problem with ham.  I corrected his use of the apostrophe in its, we had a couple of posts of varying amusement, and that was it, because he did not insist on being a dick about it for a prolonged period when corrected.  You did, because that is your nature.  So, by the way, did monkey spunk, with whom you share more characteristics than you are likely to wish to admit.

I've never been a bully in my life either in the flesh or on the net. In fact I've stared down bullys for the sake of others who couldn't stand up to them many times in my life. That is who I am. For you to call me a bully is really laughable to anyone that knows me, as you have no idea what kind of person I am.

You can be a gambler who never drew a hand, you can be a sailor who never left dry land.  You can be lord Jesus, all the world will understand.... on the web, that is.  I see what you are through your posts.  That is enough for me, and indeed that is as close to "knowing the kind of person you are" as I want to get.  You are a hectoring, bullying, jackass.

Cut your shit and we have no problems.

Right ho!  Provided I let you have the last word and continue your shit and don't respond, you have no problem!  Gotcha on that.  

But there won't be any more of your swipes to me or anyone else here. None that I'll sit back and let go by. Count on that. "Think" about that before your next swipe at someone here.

I don't "swipe" at people.  You have about six of these little spats here on the boards.  I have one.  Think about it.  It says vast amounts about you.

Fu...


In the name of goodwill this post has been retracted.

What can I say, I'm an optimist.

[CaptainCargo]

Iffy call keys Cuse


http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/recap?gameId=320280183




It never ceases to amaze me that after a dozen or so iffy(bad) calls in this game "this" is "the" iffy(bad) call.

Take the offenive foul called on the Pack player in the N.C. State/N.C. game Thursday. It was a totally shit call, just like the Cuse call, and there were several others in that game, just like the Cuse game.

Stop crying Bobby, your guys got away with enough shit too. Like a couple of no-calls as Waiters is going to the hoop. Just one of the late bad calls didn't go your way Bobby, deal with it man.

[CaptainCargo]

Physical game with LSU/Kentucky, one total cheap shot and I'm not talking about the intentional foul on Davis. It was a later one where he got smacked in the mouth by, I think it was Warren. Looked intentional to me.