Escape from Elba

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Poll

Who will win Game 5 of the NBA Finals?

Warriors
- 1 (33.3%)
Celtics
- 2 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 3

Voting closed: June 13, 2022, 11:38:11 PM


Pages: 1 ... 1593 1594 [1595] 1596 1597 ... 1849

Author Topic: Knicks  (Read 933742 times)

chipstern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4125
    • View Profile
Knicks V. Warriors, February 10, 2022
« Reply #23910 on: June 21, 2022, 12:34:36 PM »

RJ out for the Knicks.

Green for GS

Knicks win 116-114 on the road.

Excellent games from Randle, Fournier, Reddish and Burks.

Go Figure
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23911 on: June 21, 2022, 05:49:18 PM »

So lets go with it

Barrett is better trade bait than he is a leading man.

Reddish all day as we add a guard to tandem with IQ.
Logged

chipstern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4125
    • View Profile
Give It Up
« Reply #23912 on: June 21, 2022, 06:11:24 PM »

So lets go with it

Barrett is better trade bait than he is a leading man.

Reddish all day as we add a guard to tandem with IQ.

Your animus for R.J. Barrett is tiresome in the extreme. 

And your "plan" going forward is not rooted in reality. 

Take a look at the two teams in the NBA Finals. 

Just for giggles, make a head count of how many pivotal players on their roster were original Warriors and Celtics draft picks. 

They were patient moving forward. 

Yes, made bold moves, trade and free agent wise, but when they didn't play out, they remained committed to their core players, and their systems. 

R.J. is only 21, wants to be a Knick, has gotten better every year. 

So yes, Kiid says trade him. 

For what exactly...oh, nevermind.  Not even a remote chance Knicks will shop him.  They are looking for players to fit around him. 

Not a leading man?  K. 

But not a core piece moving forward? 

[Cough]

I suspect that minimally, the Knicks would need to dangle this year's #11, the 2023 Dallas pick, our 2024 #1 and a grab bag of #2 picks for the Kings #4 to get a chance at Ivey. 

Would they dangle Randle or Toppin or RJ or IQ or Fournier or Reddish or Grimes?  I doubt Nerlens or Burke gets it done. 
« Last Edit: June 21, 2022, 06:26:21 PM by chipstern »
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23913 on: June 21, 2022, 08:43:53 PM »

https://nypost.com/2022/06/20/nba-draft-2022-johnny-davis-would-relish-chance-with-knicks/

Big Ten POY wants NY.  Nice.


Summer league opener 7-8 8 pm vs GSW
Logged

facilitatorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18738
  • Bust oligopolies not unions.
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23914 on: June 21, 2022, 09:34:33 PM »

Pass on Davis, thanks all the same.
Logged
Will the Supreme Court grant trump work release to attend the republican national convention?

For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

Richard P. Feynman

kidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10395
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23915 on: June 21, 2022, 09:37:34 PM »

Sure.
Logged
- Prayers for Paul Pelosi -

facilitatorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18738
  • Bust oligopolies not unions.
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23916 on: June 21, 2022, 11:02:01 PM »

He is not Jimmer bad, but he is not worth a lottery pick this year.
Logged
Will the Supreme Court grant trump work release to attend the republican national convention?

For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

Richard P. Feynman

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23917 on: June 22, 2022, 07:09:30 AM »

Trusting Leon.  But Davis likely isn't our choice, you're right.  Though he may be a solid pro.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2022, 10:32:55 AM by kiidcarter8 »
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23918 on: June 22, 2022, 10:44:50 AM »

Holy smokes - only the Kings could FUCK up so bad.  Woj reports Sac will in fact deal the number 4 pick if it is Ivey that hasn't gone 1-3 (so if Holmgren Banchero and Jabari are gone)

Had better be a sweet deal.  Hell..just taking next best available after Ivey would work out well for them (as in leave Ivey for 5)

Now if the team dealing up is from 5 or 6 then yes - makes more sense.

I give Knicks about a 15 per cent chance at landing Ivey.  Really prefer Banchero. 
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23919 on: June 22, 2022, 11:45:31 AM »

Beal turns down option

Hmm....

I keep thinking though that we do something smaller.  Maybe Thybulle?
« Last Edit: June 22, 2022, 01:28:58 PM by kiidcarter8 »
Logged

facilitatorn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18738
  • Bust oligopolies not unions.
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23920 on: June 22, 2022, 12:34:40 PM »

If we can get rid of Fournier, sure.
Logged
Will the Supreme Court grant trump work release to attend the republican national convention?

For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled.

Richard P. Feynman

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23921 on: June 22, 2022, 01:01:07 PM »

Reddish plus the 11 plus what for the number 5?
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23922 on: June 22, 2022, 01:28:18 PM »

If we can get rid of Fournier, sure.

Two incredibly different players.
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #23923 on: June 22, 2022, 01:36:07 PM »

Knicks dealing to 5 for who?  AJ Griffin maybe?
Logged

chipstern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4125
    • View Profile
Cameron Elijah Reddish
« Reply #23924 on: June 22, 2022, 02:43:24 PM »

Having just watched how well Cam played in our unlikely 116-114 victory over the Warriors on February 10, I would hate to see him go...three point range, great finisher round the basket, excellent FT shooter, good defender and a legit 6'8" with serious wingspan who could give us coverage at SF-SG-PF.  What's not to like?  Hakws initially exchanged Luka for Trae & Cam.  Something to ponder.  Not his fault they had a log jam at SF and SG and PF. 

But I suspect that in any attempt to move up in the draft, he's a goner.

A Trevor Ariza scaled mistake, where the coach [Brown/Thibs] isn't sold on the player, and he goes on to...well...

Oh, NEVERMIND.

To Be A Knicks Fan Is To Suffer
« Last Edit: June 22, 2022, 02:47:28 PM by chipstern »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 1593 1594 [1595] 1596 1597 ... 1849