I suggest you write to Nadler if you are confused.
Arent you the guy who was accusing me of condescension a couple days ago?
We still await your explanation of what Constitutional law was violated, scholar.
I suggest you buy the book about Nadler and his opinion on the matter.
So despite claiming the Constitutional violation was both obvious and covered up by the media, you are unable to explain the nature of the violation or identify the Constitutional provision involved, let alone defend either Nadler's view or your statements the violation was obvious and covered up by the media. As expected you are behaving you intellectually dishonest PROVEN LIAR.