I posted the numbers earlier. If you can post numbers that contradict the BLS, show us. Put up or shut up.Except that was not happening.I was talking about the improved economy thanks to decreased taxes and bureaucratic red tape imposed by unnecessary regulations.Except of course job creation in the higher tax, better regulated Obama administration outpaces what has happened under Trump.
I was talking about the improved economy thanks to decreased taxes and bureaucratic red tape imposed by unnecessary regulations.Except of course job creation in the higher tax, better regulated Obama administration outpaces what has happened under Trump.
Laugh away. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, from February 17 to October 19, 6.25 million jobs created. From May 14 through January 17, 7.38 million jobs created. And that disparity is going to grow. Numbers are numbers.Uh huh. LOL.News ItemAnd yet job growth in the 33 months of the Trump administration continues to lag, by over a million jobs, the job growth over the last 33 months of the Obama administration.
WASHINGTON—U.S. employers hired at a solid clip in October, showing the job market remains strong even in the face of labor strikes and trade disputes.
The economy added 128,000 jobs in October, the Labor Department reported Friday. Job creation in September and August was revised up by a net 95,000. The jobless rate ticked up to 3.6% last month from 3.5% in September. The prior month’s reading was the lowest rate since December 1969.
Meanwhile, wage gains continued to outpace inflation. Average hourly earnings climbed 3% from October 2018.Yes
News ItemAnd yet job growth in the 33 months of the Trump administration continues to lag, by over a million jobs, the job growth over the last 33 months of the Obama administration.
WASHINGTON—U.S. employers hired at a solid clip in October, showing the job market remains strong even in the face of labor strikes and trade disputes.
The economy added 128,000 jobs in October, the Labor Department reported Friday. Job creation in September and August was revised up by a net 95,000. The jobless rate ticked up to 3.6% last month from 3.5% in September. The prior month’s reading was the lowest rate since December 1969.
Meanwhile, wage gains continued to outpace inflation. Average hourly earnings climbed 3% from October 2018.Yes
Washington Post/ABC News Poll:That is a plurality, not a majority.
Trump at 38% approval
Majority of Americans, 49%-47%, approve of impeaching and removing Trump.
44% strong for removal vs. 37% strong for remaining.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/context-card/eea087b6-ca22-4cd9-a254-6bdd49d000a4/
And good-bye MSU #35.Good -bye WVU #4
And good-bye BU #3
Both halves may be true, in that you may just be trolling, and the Constitution is clear, in that it.clearly states the House impeached but makes no comment or requirement as to the process the House uses to get there.I didn’t make any mistake. The Constitution is pretty clear.They and them?What it does say is the House(the entire body) has the sole power of impeachment.LOL. Don't ever change. We need the laughs.Neither does the Speaker. Article 1 Section 2In 1970, House minority leader Gerald R. Ford attempted to initiate impeachment proceedings against Associate Justice William O. Douglas; the attempt included a 90-minute speech on the House floor.[22] The House did not vote to initiate proceedings.Minority leader. As such he had no power, right or ability to initiate any proceedings on his own.
Nothing in the Constitution indicates you can use a.resolution to start impeachment proceedings either.
And that they can establish their own rules for how to do it.
In this case, by hearings restricted to the designated committee members of both parties.
Because the Constitution allows them to do that, no matter how much you pretend to have an argument.
You are getting closer.
Still not there, just yet.
You remain a child playing childish games, unable to admit when you have made a mistake, as ever.
Just.wanted.to add, current House rules no longer require a vote for the exercise of subpoena power. Chairs can issue subpoena, which is one reason the House vote was not needed now.Do you have an issue with the text...the source?
No issue with text or the source. I do have an issue with your selective cutting of it. Immediately after this section on the Wikipedia entry on Impeachment, comes this:
In 1973, the Senate Watergate hearings (with testimony from John Dean, and the revelation of the White House tapes by Alexander Butterfield) were held in May and June 1973, and the House Judiciary Committee authorized Chairman Rodino to commence an investigation, with subpoena power, on October 30, 1973. The full House voted to initiate impeachment proceedings on February 6, 1974, that is, after nine months of formal investigations by various Congressional committees.
Now seriously dude. Fuck off.
No, that is not what.it "stipulates". It may mean that if you are in the minority and cannot by House rules.order the holding of hearings or set the agenda of the House, a resolution is one way to try to force a hearing.In 1970, House minority leader Gerald R. Ford attempted to initiate impeachment proceedings against Associate Justice William O. Douglas; the attempt included a 90-minute speech on the House floor The House did not vote to initiate proceedings.
House didnt vote to initiate - and thus it died
This seems to indicate that a vote occurs prior to any initiation of hearings (Ford ATTEMPTED to initiate impeachment proceedings - no initiation since House wouldnt vote)
Because he was the fucking minority leader.
Doesnt matter WHY they wouldnt vote. This stipulates that there NEEDED to BE a vote in the House before proceding.
Do you have an issue with the text...the source?
Minority leader. As such he had no power, right or ability to initiate any proceedings on his own.Yes, that is the important part, whether you realize it or not.
Thats not the important part of it
LOL. Don't ever change. We need the laughs.Neither does the Speaker. Article 1 Section 2In 1970, House minority leader Gerald R. Ford attempted to initiate impeachment proceedings against Associate Justice William O. Douglas; the attempt included a 90-minute speech on the House floor.[22] The House did not vote to initiate proceedings.Minority leader. As such he had no power, right or ability to initiate any proceedings on his own.
In 1970, House minority leader Gerald R. Ford attempted to initiate impeachment proceedings against Associate Justice William O. Douglas; the attempt included a 90-minute speech on the House floor.[22] The House did not vote to initiate proceedings.Minority leader. As such he had no power, right or ability to initiate any proceedings on his own.
Well, Eisenhower.Take it up with TR. The last Republican president who did not suck.
I would like to believe this is just your sense of humor, but I have seen some posts that make me think you actually believe this?
