Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

31

Football / Re: College Football

« on: July 26, 2022, 10:25:44 PM »

Anybody paying attention to the laws of California?
Hmmmm.

Do as I say...not as I do...
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/06/newsom-california-vacation-montana-00044363

You raise a good point...  UCLA is a public school.  Will the coaches, as State employees, be prohibited from going to these games?  Or will they have to pay their own way?  Will the team be allowed to fly on a chartered jet paid for by the state? 

California has elected officials that think like adolescents -- their executive functioning skills can't seem to think ahead to all the unintended consequences of their "well intentioned" plans.

Hey, Gavin Newsome knows how to run any state in the Union.
Except his own.

He's doing a fine job when you look at FACTS.In your case ignorance is bliss and you are very blissful skippy

32

Football / Re: College Football

« on: July 11, 2022, 07:34:35 PM »

Anybody paying attention to the laws of California?

A number of away games in the B1G Midwest heartland will occur in states that California has officially condemned for not having suitably leftist social policies. The 20 states currently on the sanctions list are now due to become 22, under a 2016 state law called AB 1887. A reasonable person might figure that Americans in other states generally ought to be free to make up their own minds about local policies. A reasonable person might also consider the possibility that if 22 other states and counting do not  choose to mimic California law on such topics as transgender policy, perhaps it is California law that ought to be improved.

In any case, the California condemnations have consequences. The UCLA website states:


The California Attorney General office has updated the list of states where state funds may NOT be used for travel. Indiana and Utah are the latest states to be added.
As of July 1, 2022, there are now 20 states where AB 1887 prohibits the use of state funds to pay for travel to a state on the Attorney General list, except where one of the statutory exceptions applies. It does not affect travel that is paid for or reimbursed using nonstate funds.
The following two states, Louisiana and Arizona, will be added to California travel restrictions list as listed below.
Alabama
Arkansas
Florida
Idaho
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Mississippi
Montana
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
West Virginia
Louisiana (will be added on Aug 1, 2022)


Hmmmm.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Just say no to drugs dude

33

Football / Re: College Football

« on: July 05, 2022, 07:18:27 PM »

I don't keep up as much on minor league football as I used to so I was a little surprised to see USC and UCLA the anchors of West Coast college football want to join the B1G.

So its going to be the B1G versus the SEC for grid-iron supremacy amongst our student-athletes?   

Will the Rose Bowl parade be awarded to the B1G/SEC champion, or just rotated between Birmingham and Columbus?

Cap I'm hoping I can watch some games where smaller school's don't play it as a blood sport. There are certain multiple people and companies who have ruined it as it was meant to be

Well that was meant to be a reply to Cap but somehow it switched to Bankshot for the money😁😁

34

Football / Re: College Football

« on: July 05, 2022, 07:16:59 PM »

I don't keep up as much on minor league football as I used to so I was a little surprised to see USC and UCLA the anchors of West Coast college football want to join the B1G.

So its going to be the B1G versus the SEC for grid-iron supremacy amongst our student-athletes?   

Will the Rose Bowl parade be awarded to the B1G/SEC champion, or just rotated between Birmingham and Columbus?

Cap I'm hoping I can watch some games where smaller school's don't play it as a blood sport. There are certain multiple people and companies who have ruined it as it was meant to be

35

Football / Re: College Football

« on: June 30, 2022, 05:43:08 PM »

One less sport to watch. The greed in college football has gone over the edge to make the sport unrecognizable  from what it once was. Worship the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

36

Baseball / Re: Major League Baseball

« on: April 24, 2022, 09:50:18 PM »

Like putting lipstick on a pig

37

Baseball / Re: Major League Baseball

« on: April 07, 2022, 08:57:15 PM »

The Royals beat some team named the Guardians. What the heck are the Guardians

38

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: March 24, 2022, 08:21:30 PM »

Patriots to let Providence use team jet for game. Class act by a Class organization

39

Football / Re: College Football

« on: February 23, 2022, 04:07:59 AM »

I dont see any spam posts.

I've been reporting them. At first they were just hitting dead forums but now they're targeting active ones. There was one here today

I appreciate the reports, since there are fora I go into far less frequently and would not otherwise see them.

You can skip reporting the ones in Business and Tech, though. The only non-spam activity it receives the vast bulk of the time are silly responses to the spam posts. I don't lock it because I figure they will just target a different place.

I noticed that forum was full of them just now. The names are easy to spot of they're spammers

40

Football / Re: College Football

« on: February 22, 2022, 03:16:42 AM »

I dont see any spam posts.

I've been reporting them. At first they were just hitting dead forums but now they're targeting active ones. There was one here today

41

Football / Re: College Football

« on: February 21, 2022, 09:46:31 PM »

Why are there so many of the lengthy spam posts showing up all over the forums. I thought that was fixed years ago but they're back in annoying force

42

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: February 16, 2022, 09:34:37 PM »

Was he offside on one of them?

No. For the record, I was referring to Aaron Donald.

I saw a photo that showed Donald lined up offside. At least that's what I was referring to😀😀

43

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: February 15, 2022, 09:50:48 PM »

He was offside on one of them. I've also seen the footage now that almost the entire Rams line jumped the snap on the phantom foul third down call against the Bengals

44

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: February 14, 2022, 08:10:54 PM »

Don't know which was the bigger joke. The halftime show or the phantom defensive holding call against the Bengals on third down on the Rams last drive. Instead of 4th and game they get a new set of downs

Well, maybe a make up for missing T Higgins obvious face mask on Ramsey on his second td catch.

There was the obvious missed defensive holding by the Rams that forced Cinn  to kick a field goal instead of a first and goal on their first scoring drive. The thing is they were letting things go all game and at the very end call a phantom defensive holding penalty

45

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: February 14, 2022, 01:25:20 PM »

Don't know which was the bigger joke. The halftime show or the phantom defensive holding call against the Bengals on third down on the Rams last drive. Instead of 4th and game they get a new set of downs