I guess they will not rule on Trump as disqualified, either invoking a new definition of insurrection, or invent a requirement of conviction (that is not stated in section three and certainly was not required for the Confederates it first disqualified).Simply not true.
I do not have to say one word.They are indeed a public record which makes your choice to lie about them really stupid. But then you are a demonstrated PROVEN LIAR so you probably cannot help yourself.Her statements are public record.Why do you feel compelled to lie about her statements?Right wing detractors ?
If Gay's Right-wing detractors were critcizing her on her leadership skills at the Harvard helm, that would be a line of argument I could respect whether or not I agreed. But the laser focus on social science papers, a field in which people constantly borrow ideas and data from colleagues, tells me that this is people with an axe to grind who have predetermined what they will find.
The NYT? Wapo? The Guardian? All told her to resign.
Where is her champion, Barack Obama?
SILENT!
Guy had an extensive teaching history but her research came a cropper when her lofty advancement warranted some digging.
Then she tells the world that,essentially, killing Jews relies on context.
It is unfortunate Guy now jumps into the racist tent of Al Sharpton.
In reality her million dollar salary to stay on as a Professor is more than she is worth.
In the realm of the DEI religious cult that is the way it is nowadays.
If they are lies only she can explain why.
Her statements are public record.Why do you feel compelled to lie about her statements?Right wing detractors ?
If Gay's Right-wing detractors were critcizing her on her leadership skills at the Harvard helm, that would be a line of argument I could respect whether or not I agreed. But the laser focus on social science papers, a field in which people constantly borrow ideas and data from colleagues, tells me that this is people with an axe to grind who have predetermined what they will find.
The NYT? Wapo? The Guardian? All told her to resign.
Where is her champion, Barack Obama?
SILENT!
Guy had an extensive teaching history but her research came a cropper when her lofty advancement warranted some digging.
Then she tells the world that,essentially, killing Jews relies on context.
It is unfortunate Guy now jumps into the racist tent of Al Sharpton.
In reality her million dollar salary to stay on as a Professor is more than she is worth.
In the realm of the DEI religious cult that is the way it is nowadays.
Right wing detractors ?
If Gay's Right-wing detractors were critcizing her on her leadership skills at the Harvard helm, that would be a line of argument I could respect whether or not I agreed. But the laser focus on social science papers, a field in which people constantly borrow ideas and data from colleagues, tells me that this is people with an axe to grind who have predetermined what they will find.
Unless like RedDick and luee you believe any black female had to have received her position not out of merit but because of her race and gender, regress of her qualifications.
Hardly. Guy had, weeks before her Congress debacle, asked for modifications of her written work. She called it proactive which really meant reactive.Which by definition could not have played any role in the decision to hire her in the first place. So you are left with opining that she got the position because of her race and gender sole based on her race, gender, and your prejudices.No. By her on the job performance.A proposition for which you have no support except for her race, her gender, and your own prejudices.DEI got Gay a promotion she did not deserve.You have presented no evidence except Gay's race and gender to support your claim her hiring was based on race and gender. That and reliance on a policy you have neither the wit nor inclination to deal with as anything other than a right wing fever dream of a bogeyman.The evidence is clear.I have added DEI to the every growing list of words and phrases that you have no clue about what they mean.Res Ipsa LoquitorLOL
Funny how you left out the body of my SPEAKS
Harvard lives off DEI which by definition is identity politics (Racism)and treats whites, Jews, and Asians as Oppressors while people of color,women, and LGBTQ people are the Oppressed. ( the E is for Equity not Equality).
The school uses DEI for everything and is, therefore, by default , is racist no matter how well meaning it thinks that is.
Never mind. As you noted earlier,, you do not need evidence. Not as long as you have your prejudices.
You choose to ignore it.
LOL! How did Oilcan support his? You did not ask!By the way oil, I hope you do not expect RedDick to support this with facts. He does not need facts. He has his certainty and that is all he needs.Had Gay been a student, she would have been removed 15 seconds after the first batch of documents was made public. Had Gay been a conservative, she would have been sent to hell
Gay has received a level of hostile scrutiny by and dissection that no white male university prez has ever received from Ward's ilk. The bias is thick enough to make a spoon stand up in it.
If commercial conditions such as inflation, interest rates and supply chain disruptions are hindering wind projects then Bidens policy approach is exactly what is needed to help future projects as they face such global economic disruptions. Government support for wind can really help bring this form of energy to maturity. Good work, Joe!Governments cannot build wind farms. Capitalists are needed for that.
Huh?Had Gay been a student, she would have been removed 15 seconds after the first batch of documents was made public. Had Gay been a conservative, she would have been sent to hell
Gay has received a level of hostile scrutiny by and dissection that no white male university prez has ever received from Ward's ilk. The bias is thick enough to make a spoon stand up in it.
If Gay's Right-wing detractors were critcizing her on her leadership skills at the Harvard helm, that would be a line of argument I could respect whether or not I agreed. But the laser focus on social science papers, a field in which people constantly borrow ideas and data from colleagues, tells me that this is people with an axe to grind who have predetermined what they will find.
Had Gay been a student, she would have been removed 15 seconds after the first batch of documents was made public. Had Gay been a conservative, she would have been sent to hell
Gay has received a level of hostile scrutiny by and dissection that no white male university prez has ever received from Ward's ilk. The bias is thick enough to make a spoon stand up in it.
No. By her on the job performance. She is an embarrassment to higher education.A proposition for which you have no support except for her race, her gender, and your own prejudices.DEI got Gay a promotion she did not deserve.You have presented no evidence except Gay's race and gender to support your claim her hiring was based on race and gender. That and reliance on a policy you have neither the wit nor inclination to deal with as anything other than a right wing fever dream of a bogeyman.The evidence is clear.I have added DEI to the every growing list of words and phrases that you have no clue about what they mean.Res Ipsa LoquitorLOL
Funny how you left out the body of my SPEAKS
Harvard lives off DEI which by definition is identity politics (Racism)and treats whites, Jews, and Asians as Oppressors while people of color,women, and LGBTQ people are the Oppressed. ( the E is for Equity not Equality).
The school uses DEI for everything and is, therefore, by default , is racist no matter how well meaning it thinks that is.
Never mind. As you noted earlier,, you do not need evidence. Not as long as you have your prejudices.
You choose to ignore it.
DEI got Gay a promotion she did not deserve.You have presented no evidence except Gay's race and gender to support your claim her hiring was based on race and gender. That and reliance on a policy you have neither the wit nor inclination to deal with as anything other than a right wing fever dream of a bogeyman.The evidence is clear.I have added DEI to the every growing list of words and phrases that you have no clue about what they mean.Res Ipsa LoquitorLOL
Funny how you left out the body of my SPEAKS
Harvard lives off DEI which by definition is identity politics (Racism)and treats whites, Jews, and Asians as Oppressors while people of color,women, and LGBTQ people are the Oppressed. ( the E is for Equity not Equality).
The school uses DEI for everything and is, therefore, by default , is racist no matter how well meaning it thinks that is.
Never mind. As you noted earlier,, you do not need evidence. Not as long as you have your prejudices.
You choose to ignore it.
The evidence is clear.I have added DEI to the every growing list of words and phrases that you have no clue about what they mean.Res Ipsa LoquitorLOL
Funny how you left out the body of my SPEAKS
Harvard lives off DEI which by definition is identity politics (Racism)and treats whites, Jews, and Asians as Oppressors while people of color,women, and LGBTQ people are the Oppressed. ( the E is for Equity not Equality).
The school uses DEI for everything and is, therefore, by default , is racist no matter how well meaning it thinks that is.
Never mind. As you noted earlier,, you do not need evidence. Not as long as you have your prejudices.
Res Ipsa LoquitorLOL
