Escape from Elba

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - REDSTATEWARD

Pages: 1 ... 394 395 [396]
5926
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 11, 2018, 11:51:43 PM »

Outside of some other possibilities, this is why Trump won’t release his tax returns.
The fiasco of democrats jousting with the Emlouments Windmill would certainly be a 24/7 futile exercise if Trump’s tax returns were available.

Quote
The hyped benefits are, so far, all hype.  Republicans sold the cut as primarily a booster for middle class wages. Wages this year haven’t kept up with inflation, so real wages have gone down in 2018, especially for people below the top 25%. 
Wrong. Real wages have gone UP for everyone along with the GDP while unemployment has gone DOWN. Any rise in inflation does not change that.  But I notice your faulty logic begs the question “ “ what if there were no tax cuts while inflation went up”?

Quote
The same people Paul Ryan & Co. promised big raises to (remember that $4,000/year number?) haven’t seen squat while stock buybacks set records.  People who don’t pay attention to the daily back and forth of politics notice when they look at their paychecks once or twice a month and see that they have been lied to.
LOL. More people now have paychecks to look at thanks to the tax cuts
Quote

Democrats have done a good job articulating the trade-offs, and (accurately) describing Republican priorities.  I think it was Connor Lamb who had the ad that highlighted how quickly Ryan pivoted from passing the $1.5 Trillion tax cut to proposing cuts in social spending.
the increase in Social Spending was the democrats’ price tag for the tax cuts.
Quote
Republicans spent 8 years hyping the dangers of a deficit, and while they are strangely silent on that now, people remember.  And no one who isn’t a deeply indoctrinated right winger believes the bullshit that tax cuts pay for themselves anymore.
Hypocrisy, squared. Hillary ran on eliminating energy jobs and higher taxes.  Trump ran on lowering taxes and preserving energy jobs.

Sorry for quoting the entirety of an entirely useless response, but I can’t cut out the bit where REDSTATEWARD says a rise in inflation doesn’t change real wages so that I can point out that real wages by definition adjust for inflation.

When a “raise” doesn’t result in an increase in buying power it’s not really a raise. And when you are in over your head in a discussion REDSTATEWARD, best sit there quietly and learn something.
you seem to overlook the obvious that going from no job TO a job means a big raise, while you duck the also-obvious that even though a growing economy often stirs up inflation the wage increases and lower taxes boosted consumer spending the largest sector affecting GDP.
You also are oblivious to the news that despite a tax cut for individuals the CBO says tax revenues for the first 10 months of 2018 are HIGHER than last year by 8 per cent or 104 Billion dollars.
The deficit went up because of increases in entitlement spending.
But the bottom line is even with a tax cut for individuals withholding from paychecks increased by $32 billion, which “largely reflects increases in wages and salaries.”(CBO).
It probably shocks you that a faster-growing economy employs more people who make more money.
Which is exactly what has happened.

5927
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 11, 2018, 08:26:26 PM »
There were no contacts between the campaign and foreign governments.

Oh, wait... There were no contacts with Russians.

Oh, wait... There were contacts with Russians but they weren’t improper.

Oh, wait... The Trump Tower meeting was about abortion issues.

Oh, wait... The Trump Tower meeting was about routine “opposition research.”

Oh, wait... The Russians never produced the material they’d promised, so it doesn't matter.

Oh, wait... There’s nothing improper about accepting opposition research from a foreign adversary. Collusion is legal.


Each defense has lasted until facts emerged to render it inoperative.
Your conclusion is the inoperative.
Nothing on your list points to a crime.
Without a crime no one, let alone POTUS, can be subpoenaed.
Without a crime Impeachment won’t happen.

5928
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 10, 2018, 09:54:14 PM »
"Witch hunt" and "liberal fascism" in consecutive posts, Red. Nice to see you using Donald Trump and Jonah F'ing Goldberg as intellectual lodestars.
no evidence to date suggests otherwise.

5929
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 10, 2018, 08:32:32 PM »

5930
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 10, 2018, 08:08:08 PM »
The New York Times explains its latest witch hunt to discredit SCOTUS nominee Brett Cavanaugh.


U.S. Supreme Court justices have some of the most important jobs in the country, given their lifetime appointments and the gravity of the issues facing the high court.

That’s why newsrooms across the country, including The New York Times, have spilled a lot of ink covering President Trump’s nomination of Brett M. Kavanaugh to fill the seat left vacant by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s retirement.

As journalists, we aim to shed light on important people in the news — particularly public officials and Supreme Court nominees — to help our readers understand them, how they think and how they operate. That due diligence leads us to interview people who know the nominees, like colleagues and neighbors. It requires that we read what the nominees have written or watch speeches they’ve delivered. And it often depends on our requests for public records that could offer our readers a fresh perspective about the nominees.

In the case of Mr. Kavanaugh, The Times requested records under Maryland’s public records law from Chevy Chase Section 5, where the nominee’s wife, Ashley, serves as town manager.

We sought email records involving Judge Kavanaugh and communications that referenced hot-button topics. We believed that the records, if they existed, could provide a unique and personalized view into the nominee. We worked with the town to minimize the time and cost involved in responding to our request. (The Associated Press submitted its own request, and The Times and others have filed separate requests with the National Archives pertaining to Mr. Kavanaugh.)

Ultimately, our request yielded 85 pages of emails, none of which provided any substantive insights into Mr. Kavanaugh’s judicial philosophy. Instead, the records were largely what you would expect from a town manager’s email account — mundane dispatches about town business, from snow removals to local newsletters. Not surprisingly, a number of people, neighbors and strangers alike, sent Ashley Kavanaugh congratulations on her husband’s nomination.

In other words, it was hardly front-page news.

And yet, we recognized before submitting the request that this was a possible outcome. We often file public records requests that yield no newsworthy information.

But when it comes to reporting on a potential Supreme Court justice, we had to try.

5931
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 10, 2018, 07:54:01 PM »
Anti-intellectualism is alive and well in other places, not just in the US:
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/it-s-unprecedented-staffers-drown-out-reporters-by-clapping-at-doug-ford-news-conference-1.4779157

Troll Josh’s Internet search turns up international liberal fascism!
Dog bites man.

5932
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 10, 2018, 06:33:51 PM »

Outside of some other possibilities, this is why Trump won’t release his tax returns.
The fiasco of democrats jousting with the Emlouments Windmill would certainly be a 24/7 futile exercise if Trump’s tax returns were available.

Quote
The hyped benefits are, so far, all hype.  Republicans sold the cut as primarily a booster for middle class wages. Wages this year haven’t kept up with inflation, so real wages have gone down in 2018, especially for people below the top 25%. 
Wrong. Real wages have gone UP for everyone along with the GDP while unemployment has gone DOWN. Any rise in inflation does not change that.  But I notice your faulty logic begs the question “ “ what if there were no tax cuts while inflation went up”?

Quote
The same people Paul Ryan & Co. promised big raises to (remember that $4,000/year number?) haven’t seen squat while stock buybacks set records.  People who don’t pay attention to the daily back and forth of politics notice when they look at their paychecks once or twice a month and see that they have been lied to.
LOL. More people now have paychecks to look at thanks to the tax cuts
Quote

Democrats have done a good job articulating the trade-offs, and (accurately) describing Republican priorities.  I think it was Connor Lamb who had the ad that highlighted how quickly Ryan pivoted from passing the $1.5 Trillion tax cut to proposing cuts in social spending.
the increase in Social Spending was the democrats’ price tag for the tax cuts.
Quote
Republicans spent 8 years hyping the dangers of a deficit, and while they are strangely silent on that now, people remember.  And no one who isn’t a deeply indoctrinated right winger believes the bullshit that tax cuts pay for themselves anymore.
Hypocrisy, squared. Hillary ran on eliminating energy jobs and higher taxes.  Trump ran on lowering taxes and preserving energy jobs.

 

5933
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 09, 2018, 08:22:14 PM »
It is of course just wrong.  The idea that immigration runs counter to the idea of America is breathtakingly ignorant of the very history of this country.


While this may be true, I do think it's important to add that for a very long time large amounts of Americans have been more in favor immigration as an idea, rather than a policy.
What Americans have been and are still interested in is what power our Government has in controlling Immigration.
SCOTUS said in 1893
every sovereign nation has the power, as inherent in sovereignty, and essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within its dominions.’”
That principle was upheld this year by the Court in ruling in favor of the Trump Travel Ban.

Obviously we  can allow others to join our country but we have the sovereign right to specify the terms and qualifications. We said, in the Declaration of Independence, that Americans are absolved from perpetual allegiance to the British Crown
To
no individual can be ruled without his consent.

So any immigration policy based on charity, compassion, or trite phrases like “ diversity is our strength” is ridiculous.

We have the duty to insist that those wishing to join us will adopt our habits, manners, independence, and self-reliance.
Plus present useful skills to prevent them from becoming victims of the welfare state.




5934
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 08, 2018, 07:50:02 PM »
Quite possible... some areas have renormalizing of districts tied up in court well past November.  And many gerrymanders remain unchallenged. 

Gerrymandered districts will be an issue.  Yes.  Democrats will need to win by somewhere between 4 and 8 percentage points overall to win control of the House. 

But the lesson from last night wasn't the fact that the district was fine-tuned for the Rs (it has been Republican for 30 years) its that they no longer can take for granted that they will get support from constituencies that they would have otherwise gerrymandered into a solid R district, ie. wealthy white suburbs.
No they won’t. Like a mandated federal minimum wage no consensus exists to change anything.

5935
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 05, 2018, 06:44:32 PM »
Elitist positions;

Open borders, screw the unions and working poor and those that went through the process legally.

Open enrollment and free education. Everybody deserves it.

Screw the vets. Not needed, everyone loves us.

No dirty coal mines or oil wells. Think of the beautiful landscapes ruined and bears and reindeer who have to listen and see the man made monstrosities. We can by cheap oil from our Saudi friends.

What makes it elitist?

If you wanted to claim it's Neo-liberal, I could understand it.

But what does elitism have to do with anything beyond disdain for the racists, misogynists, xenophobes, etc? (And even that I would argue has nothing to do with elitism, but it is closer as it claims superiority to them.)

More of a disdain for the values and lifestyles of anyone who is not an ivy lawyer. Particularly blue collar workers. You just cannot go to W. Virginia and tell voters you want to do away with coal mines.

It was a dumb line.

But it is still true and has nothing to do with elitism, Luee.

Nothing.

Your opinions not withstanding, Clinton's demonstrated more caring and understanding of the poor and working poor than you seem to be able to acknowledge - more than Bernie, to be sure. But her comment there was, according to her, her biggest regret of the campaign.

Quote
"I'm the only candidate which has a policy about how to bring economic opportunity using clean renewable energy as the key into coal country," she said . "Because we're going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business."

She quickly added that she wanted to help coal miners and other workers who gave their health and sometimes their lives to produce the nation's energy.

"And we're going to make it clear that we don't want to forget those people," she added. "Those people labored in those mines for generations, losing their health, often losing their lives to turn on our lights and power our factories."

Your disdain for Elizabeth Warren is even more misplaced.

You come across as a faux-progressive who has swallowed the talking points against HRC without really understanding them or where they came from.
Interesting that the current economy has been very kind to blacks and low income wage earners.

5936
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: July 31, 2018, 08:10:13 PM »
You just confused Tony V.

High speed trains work in Japan,  but the Japanese actually use mass transit which is how mass transit needs to be supported.
Gee, what a concept.

5937
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: July 31, 2018, 06:35:00 PM »
The Gray Lady poses a question in a Monday headline:

The $100 Billion Train: California’s future or a Boondoggle?


How about BOTH?

5938
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: July 31, 2018, 01:49:17 AM »
Socialism!!!!
Front runners as dem presidential ballot in 2020
Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez.
Socialists.

5939
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: July 30, 2018, 04:10:20 PM »
I don't consider this place open for business unless and until Red returns to teaching us things.
Somebody has to.

Pages: 1 ... 394 395 [396]