Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

2236

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 10, 2020, 11:48:39 AM »

And as I understand once you run out of fingers and toes counting becomes a challenge for you.

So I'll be glad to lend a hand.

heh

2237

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 10, 2020, 11:45:46 AM »

Thanks

Can you keep the tally for the rest of the year?

For the record, we split last night, as I had the over, you the under.

Congratulations for matching 46% handicapper.

For the record I did not bet the game or hold myself as betting the game.

I liked the Jets +10 and the under with the Pats winning by 4.

For the record I've only picked about 8 games this year.

But I think I'm 5-3 ATS and ou

I'd check but since I'm not betting like you I don't really care.

2238

Baseball / Re: Major League Baseball

« on: November 10, 2020, 11:14:49 AM »

I imagine if we are lucky enough to have Joe Biden throw out a 1st pitch in DC opening day, Nats fans will give a Phillie's fan a standing O. 

2239

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 10, 2020, 11:05:57 AM »

heh

kid loves changing the subject and evading reality.

and avoiding taking responsibility for his own poor prognostications.

Pats were lucky to beat arguably the worst team in the NFL last night.

but the JETS remain the J-E-T-S

you had a another tough week kid

5-9

61-71

closing in on down $2K for the year.

you're due kid.

better luck next week

2240

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 11:26:33 PM »

Pretty funny.

So... was that a good game for MNF or a bad one?!

bad football that turned into an entertaining game

2241

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 11:11:04 PM »

ITS GOOD!

Good bye Trevor!

heh

2242

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 10:03:41 PM »

So Bank states NE offense will be horrible

They score 21, 30 and 36 first three games

QB gets COVID, foggy even when he returns, but looks better last week - and should have beat a good Bills team (scored 21, could easily have been 28, down his best receiver)

Keep the chuckles coming, Bank.  That's your role here

kid I told you in the pre-season the Pats were real light on offensive weapons and had a new QB unfamiliar with their system So offense was my biggest concern.

You told me Cam was going to make a star out of Jules.

I told you then you had no idea what you were talking about as Jules was cooked.

And he was.

I told earlier today the Pats would be challenged tonight against a very bad Jet team.

I'm perfectly comfortable with my takes on the Pats

2243

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 08:47:08 PM »

"the fastest first quarter in memory"

I see a low-scoring field position game with a lot of rushing, a lot of punting, and a game that gets over quick.

[/b]

heh

2244

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 08:38:02 PM »

Pardon my hyperbole, but the Pats offense sucks, as I told you it probably would before the season started.

2245

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 08:25:31 PM »

eyeballing Josh's QB list

not sure what "modern day" means but

I'd add old-school QBs Johnny U and maybe Fran Tarkenton and Bart Starr

and not sure of Russell Wilson

I'm not sure about Luck either-hurt too much, short career

or Young sat behind Montana too long

or maybe Staubach too much Navy and not enough Dallas.

kid- Can you confirm the hits and misses

2246

Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration

« on: November 09, 2020, 04:40:04 PM »

Red seems to wish he could forget about California and just ignore about 10% of this year's voters.

Yes Red the vote would be much closer if you could just ignore 14 million voters in the nations most populous state.

That is the wish of those who, like Red, see voter suppression as their best option for an oppressive minority to retain power.

He also seems to forget that the Repubs lost control of the House in '18 and the WH this year.

But he does take solace in the power to gerrymander (redistrict) Repub controlled states going forward.

And that is ultimately the goal of those, who like Red, are afraid of democracy.

2247

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 04:01:35 PM »

There was a lot of bad football played yesterday.

Fortunately, we have the Pats and Jets tonight.

That will make it all better, right?!

Howard and Dandy Don weep

I see the line os the game is Pats -9.5 or -10

I'm not sure the Pats can score much more than 15 (that's 5 FG-I'm not sure they can score TD anymore)

I generally like overs, but if I were to wager I'd give a hard look at the Jets and the under (42)

I see 3 offensive TDs for Pat's

No Newton turnovers

Take the over on Pat's number

I see a low-scoring field position game with a lot of rushing, a lot of punting, and a game that gets over quick.

something like 17-13 Pats,

I'd take the 10

2248

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 03:54:26 PM »

eyeballing Josh's QB list

not sure what "modern day" means but

I'd add old-school QBs Johnny U and maybe Fran Tarkenton and Bart Starr

and not sure of Russell Wilson

2249

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 01:13:40 PM »

Flacco fares pretty well vs Pats, if I recall.

1-4 regular season

2-2 post-season.

total 3-6



good chance these teams will not meet in the post-season.

2250

Football / Re: National Football League

« on: November 09, 2020, 12:44:07 PM »

There was a lot of bad football played yesterday.

Fortunately, we have the Pats and Jets tonight.

That will make it all better, right?!

Howard and Dandy Don weep

I see the line os the game is Pats -9.5 or -10

I'm not sure the Pats can score much more than 15 (that's 5 FG-I'm not sure they can score TD anymore)

I generally like overs, but if I were to wager I'd give a hard look at the Jets and the under (42)