Escape from Elba

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - bodiddley

Pages: 1 ... 160 161 [162] 163 164 ... 436
2416
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: September 01, 2020, 11:41:29 AM »
1000 known cases at Univ of Alabama Tuscaloosa.
Between students, professors and university staff, I'd say there's good likelihood some will need to be hospitalized.  But the issue is how many people those 1000+ are spreading it to others.  And then in that larger outbreak the virus will find it's way to elderly or people with health issues who may die or need to be hospitalized.  And some young people get hit hard by the virus, and there's no doubt obese students or other with health issues.

2417
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: September 01, 2020, 12:53:51 AM »
Of course the violence will continue under Trump. The man has no interest in stopping it.


What do you call sending/offering federal officers?

Continuing the violence with their orders to crack heads and deploy tear gas and shoot rubber bullets, with police riots encouraged, pull people into unmarked vans, etc.

2419
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 02:04:34 PM »
Interesting, Kam.

Unfortunately mostly the only people who have taken the virus seriously are those who were in or near a significant outbreak.  The Wuhan/Hubei outbreak was a kick in the pants for China to become serious.  Very, very few places took strong measures before the virus hit them -- only Vietnam, HK (but with the China outbreak in their backyard), Taiwan, New Zealand as far as I know.  All hugely successful too.

Only after the scary and devastating NYC/NY metro area outbreak NY and NJ got serious.  Were temp checks ever implemented in the US? During the 2 month lockdown here, most food stores and such did temp checks before allowing you in.  Was pretty common for office buildings once the reopening started up.  Etc.
I have no idea how useful this was, though it certainly is useful at the airport.

I think the 6' rule was more of a distraction than a help in the US.  People were inconvenienced and felt like they were doing more than they were to stop transmission.  China didn't do this at all.I posted an article about the old and faulty science behind that distance rule last week.

Shanghai hasn't let anyone on the subway (or bus/plane/train) without a mask on since Jan 23.  I will agree it was easier to wear a mask in Feb/March than in June/July.  Though by then mask wearing was already pretty optional in SH.

2420
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 11:46:56 AM »
Quote
Kelly, a former Marine Corps general, was the secretary of homeland security before serving as the White House chief of staff from July 2017 to January 2019. His departure came after reports that he and Trump were no longer on speaking terms.

"Kelly has told others that Trump wanted to behave like an authoritarian and repeatedly had to be restrained and told what he could and could not legally do," the book says, according to Axios.

It continued: "Aside from questions of the law, Kelly has told others that one of the most difficult tasks he faced with Trump was trying to stop him from pulling out of NATO — a move that Trump has repeatedly threatened but never made good on, which would have been a seismic breach of American alliances and an extraordinary gift to Putin."


2421
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 10:41:38 AM »
So it seems under the advice of Dr. Atlas, Trump may be trying a stealth Sweden approach.  Let the virus spread in schools and among the young and healthy and see if the USofA can get to herd immunity without too many dying. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/new-trump-pandemic-adviser-pushes-controversial-herd-immunity-strategy-worrying-public-health-officials/ar-BB18xMz7

Less testing among the young and asymptomatics seems another step down the herd immunity path.

Quote
“President Trump is fully focused on defeating the virus through therapeutics and ultimately a vaccine. There is no discussion about changing our strategy,” White House communications director Alyssa Farah said in a statement. “We have initiated an unprecedented effort under Operation Warp Speed to safely bring a vaccine to market in record time — ending this virus through medicine is our top focus.”

The way to defeat the virus is through limiting and preventing transmission.
The idea that some magic existing drug will prove aces or a highly effective virus is just around the corner is awfully faulty thinking.  Extremely irresponsible.  How hard is it to wear a face mask in public when near other people?

Quote
Atlas has also said he is unsure “scientifically” whether masks make sense, despite broad consensus among scientists that they are effective.

Quote
With a population of 328 million in the United States, it may require 2.13 million deaths to reach a 65 percent threshold of herd immunity, assuming the virus has a 1 percent fatality rate, according to an analysis by The Washington Post.

No one wants to come out and say we're willing to have perhaps 2M deaths so that we can reopen the economy.

And there's really no consensus on what % is required to achieve herd immunity.  There's very little research on how long anti-bodies and any such immunity lasts, whether people can get the virus more than once (a few reportedly have), etc.
Lotta guesswork and uncertainty, including whether CV-19 will return seasonally in force as flu does. 

A scary thought is that this August peak that the US is going through could actually be a warm weather lull in the strength of the virus -- with apparently a smaller % dying and symptoms not as serious in general -- and the Virus could ramp up when the weather turns colder.  That is, the half measures in most of the US might have  led to a much worse outbreak except that Summer slowed down the Virus, and Winter could be devastating.   Sure hope not.

2422
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 10:22:40 AM »
Still mind-boggling that Trump won and became president.

But the idea that he has a chance of reelection despite years of racism and white nationalist support, encouraging gun nuttery, governing by Twitter, lying constantly, sounding stupid even more, just being a loud jerk all the time, and then to top it off the horrendous failed response to the epidemic with its attendant unnecessary death toll and 6 months of a ruined economy and ruined lives -- it's just unbelievable one person outside his immediate family will vote for Trump.

One thing about being overseas, is it's easy to step back and see the overall picture.  The US really needs to right itself as its decline has been very rapid this century. 
If someone proved tomorrow that Trump was a Russian or Chinese plant, most people would nod their heads somewhat relieved as at least the last 3 years would make some kind of sense . . .

2423
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 08:59:48 AM »
Red seems to be some unpleasant combination of trolling with mental health issues.
Sad.

2424
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 07:54:03 AM »
1000 people in America are dying every day from Covid-19.

It's down to about 950 over this past week.

Because even basic measures -- especially mask wearing -- mostly complied with has a positive effect and reduces transmission.  Of course if serious measures were taken early (lets say March) and complied with to a large degree, the virus would be basically gone and businesses and life would be largely back to normal (with the exception of large gatherings).  How do I know that?  That's what I've lived through. 

Jan 21 China locked down.  By March 21 we were allowed to play basketball at some gyms, just with a temp check on the way in for two weeks, and the first week leaving your name and phone number for contact tracing.  A gradual reopening went on in stages in April and May.  Precautions continued in June, such as mask wearing and companies encouraged to let employees work at home if possible.  July and August have been totally back to normal.  The only place I wear a mask, or need to, is when I visit my doctor friends at the hospital.

It's been roughly 3 months of normal here; the last two you'd hardly know there had been a pandemic.  Maybe 20% of people still wear masks.  Though on the street, most mask wearers have them down on their chin.  It's become cool to have a face mask wrapped around your upper arm like an armband, in case you need it  -- I think the subway and buses still require masks.

No reason the US couldn't have been on the same schedule as China, just a month or two later.  If strict careful measures were in place by March 21,  June and July would have seen staged reopenings and everything would have been normal by August.  And there'd be no virus to speak of for school openings.  Should have happened that way... All it would have taken is American wearing face masks for 8-20 weeks to avoid 6 months of epidemic and hundreds of thousands of deaths, millions infected ....

2425
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 01:05:02 AM »
WRONG

2426
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 12:57:28 AM »
Quote
“The bill was mistakenly issued based on advice I received from our borough administrator who I understand consulted the borough attorney,” Kranjac told NJ Advance Media. “I was told that all private events requiring police overtime should be paid for by the organizers. That advice was incorrect.”

Kranjac said he further researched the issue with his own attorney and said it was “clear that the exercise of Constitutional Rights are treated differently when it comes to borough administration and billing.”

Pretty obvious and basic stuff.

Then again back in the day, I'm sure Red would argue the legality of poll taxes.  Hell, he might be in favor of them today ...

2427
Basketball / Re: NBA
« on: August 31, 2020, 12:51:12 AM »
There is still hope moving forward for Harris and their BIG THREE (plus Al), surely.
With Fultz, may have had something special.

With Fultz, their Big 3 would all be without 3-ability.
Not viable in today's NBA.

2428
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 12:44:01 AM »
The on-going saga of Red is never wrong even when he is clearly wrong.
A waste of time to engage with him.

In any case, the foolish local NJ gov't had to reverse itself.  But it's pretty ballsy to try to chill and restrict 1st A rights in that manner.  No idea why Red doesn't support Freedom and Constitutional Rights instead of a money-grubbing township.  If he can't see why the courts wouldn't allow that, we might have to revoke his Constitutional Scholar Merit Badge.

I like the hypothetical that someone holds a 3 man political rally in public and they send 10 cops to watch the proceedings (hey, they didn't know how big or dangerous the rally would be) and at $100/hr, the protesters would be on the hook for $1000 per hour.  But even send 3 officers to a 15 person rally, and $300 an hour is an undue burden to exercising protected rights.  They tried to hit up an 18 year old girl for $2500 for her fairly small, peaceful rally by the gov't building.

2429
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 31, 2020, 12:34:49 AM »
Quote
A public political protest is NOT a private event.
This one was a private event.
Quote
Which is why the local gov't changed their position and withdrew the bill.
It didnt withdraw the bill
Quote
And the mayor admitted that he got bad advice form the borough legal counsel.
The Mayor said no such thing 

Short answer: wrong, wrong, wrong.

It was a public political protest held on the sidewalk in front of the municipal building with people holding signs and chanting political slogans.  Exercising 1st A rights to assemble and free speech in public.

The local gov't withdrew the bill, because they realized it was unconstitutional

The mayor blamed other gov't officials for bad advice (that might have been in the accompanying video, not the main article).

Afterwards the mayor refused to be interviewed again.
He looked so shifty and creepy when he first explained the bill in public, he probably decided hiding out was a better idea after he had to backtrack and cancel the absurd police bill.

Amazing you don't see anything wrong with charging the organizer of a public political rally for the police presence they probably don't even want.

Maybe should charge James Blake Jr for those 7 bullets and any police OT his case may accrue ...

2430
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: August 30, 2020, 11:08:27 PM »
Did you even read the article you linked?

“I was shocked when I read that I had to pay to exercise my First Amendment right,” said Gil, who thinks she was being targeted for her take on affordable housing in the community.

“And we made sure that we fulfilled and satisfied our obligation to make sure that they can exercise their freedom of speech and to peaceably assemble,” said Mayor Kranjac.

Kranjac said the borough has an ordinance in place that allows it to bill for any expenses incurred for police services at private events. The bill sent to Gil was standard protocol, he said.

Apparently you did not.

A public political protest is NOT a private event.
Which is why the local gov't changed their position and withdrew the bill.
And the mayor admitted that he got bad advice form the borough legal counsel.

If you are charging the girl for police OT, you are restricting and putting a price on people's 1st A right to assemble.  In this case, an 18 year old girl is unlikely to have an extra $2,500 to fork over to protest.  And the bigger the rally, and the longer it goes on, the more the bill would be.  Ridiculously unconstitutional.

Pages: 1 ... 160 161 [162] 163 164 ... 436