https://twitter.com/SLAMonline/status/1208185951672885248?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commercialappeal.com%2Fstory%2Fsports%2F2019%2F12%2F20%2Fgrizzlies-vs-cavaliers-ja-morant-clears-kevin-love-dunk-attempt%2F2663785001%2F
Let's say Knick management does
the simple easy thing. When faced with a vacancy,
hires the best coach available, one who conveniently wants to come to the city.
Budenholzer.
Then does the
simple natural no-brainer thing. Try to win games. I reckon we would have finished around 33-49 last year. And looked pretty decent. Like a team on the upswing. With some potential and a good vibe. Improving. Like the Nets under Kenny. With an eager unicorn waiting in the wings.
I think this situation would have gotten us sit-down or two. I think right now our lineup would look like this.
Mitch.
Porzingis.
Butler.
Hardaway.
Morant.
I think we would be around 19-11, or even better, happy as pigs in shit, and celebrating the start of the New Year with the most exciting Knick team in two decades, and eyes firmly pointed heavensward.
There's plenty of variation possible. Maybe Hardaway's not and there's a second A-lister in the lineup. Kemba? I think we easily moved THJ if Budenholzer was coaching him and we were playing to win, but you could have attached a pick to get rid off him if you needed to sign that second A-lister, no big deal. And maybe it's Zion, not Morant, or maybe Hachimura, or Herro, or even still RJ. Not materially different.
Nothing far fetched about the above. Or variations on the above. No brainer stuff. It's where we would be with the most base-level competency in basketball management.When that AXE gonna fall?