Mario is a Sg-sf. He isn’t all that important.
Vonleh is a legit PF/ small ball C. If Fiz can get real growth out of Vonleh we have a much more competitive team than expected. Booker would have been good, but I think Vonleh moves the needle more.
Booker might indeed have been a more impactful player.
However these are not the Knicks of Kidd, Camby, KT and Wallace. We had a winning season and made it to the playoffs, where the wheels came off as the most significant person on the floor, Jason Kidd, finally exhausted his mojo.
The idea, again, is not to milk another 5-7 short term wins out of our team, but to create a winning SUSTAINABLE culture, albeit with the knowledge that fielding such a tadpole team is going to lead to a goodly number of beatdowns in the short term, least ways until (and likely, thereafter) KP returns.
Again, not to beat a dead horse, but what exactly are we debating here: BOOKER IS THIRTY YEARS OLD. What's the point? Booker brings nothing to this team that we do not already have, especially with a capable role player in Lance Thomas, who is also 30, also 6'8", albeit with a bigger body, and--IRONICALLY--a genuine threat from three-point range, significantly better than from 2-point range. Booker brings nothing in that regard.
2015-2016: .404%
2016-2017: .447%
2017-2018: .403%
I will be very curious to see how Mario responds to Fizdale's system. Perry was obviously very invested in the kid.
He is a very skilled player. However, he is certainly not a complete player on the defensive end, and I too wonder how he would match up with real NBA power-forwards. I'm not seeing it.
Fizz is milking that position-less cow.
We shall see.