I think WASH did OK. Many decisions still to make (I would deal Porter)
I don't think they did okay. They traded a young promising SF for an old vet SF in Ariza, hoping to make the playoffs. I don't think that was going to work, but almost immediately thereafter, Wall is done for the season, and adding Ariza looks pointless.*
Also, they waited too long to move Uber, so his value was down since he is a rookie-contract-ending deal, meaning he needs to get paid, while he's shown promise and flashes but not clearly starter material yet. Still they could have moved Ube for another young guy. Especially to a team with a good balance sheet that wouldn't mind paying Uber next year (a la PHX). I'd have to look around for possibilities, but perhaps Skal Labisserie who has trouble finding minutes in Sacto. Or Khem Birch in ORL. Thon Maker? Hell, I'd rather add Rich Holmes from PHX, a hard worker, rather than Ariza who will bolt first chance he gets.
If they were going to deal Porter (not easy given his contract), then they should have kept Oubre as a replacement at likely half the cost or less next year. The reason they dealt Uber was their cap is all clogged up with deals such as Wall and Porter's, so they weren't going to pay Uber the $12M +/-$2M he'll want.
So, I think Ernie made a hash of things.
* They should view Ariza as a trade asset and look to move him to a contender (HOU! or OKC or ??) before the deadline, and give Double Dekker bigger minutes. That could salvage something from the mess they've made.
Can't say I trust Ernie to know Bernard King from Burger King these days, after he thought it was a good idea to add Au Revoir and Dwight to an already underperforming, dysfunctional team . . .
Meansowhile, Uber is averaging 14.5 & 4.2 Boards with PHX. Your numbers tend to be wrong. Also, when you support someone you like to inflate their contributions by citing per36, but apparently don't do it on players you don't like.