Total Members Voted: 11
Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM
Quote from: jmmengel on November 19, 2024, 03:46:32 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 03:23:45 PMI remember when conservatives used to be opposed to criminals getting off on a technicality.What technicality?The Supreme Court's creation of an evidentiary privilege for executive communications even when planning and committing felonies, for one.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 03:23:45 PMI remember when conservatives used to be opposed to criminals getting off on a technicality.What technicality?
I remember when conservatives used to be opposed to criminals getting off on a technicality.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 04:14:22 PMQuote from: jmmengel on November 19, 2024, 03:46:32 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 03:23:45 PMI remember when conservatives used to be opposed to criminals getting off on a technicality.What technicality?The Supreme Court's creation of an evidentiary privilege for executive communications even when planning and committing felonies, for one.Arent felonies part of the official duties of a president yet? Trump clearly dawdled in his first administration.
Quote from: Oilcandide on November 19, 2024, 06:34:26 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 04:14:22 PMQuote from: jmmengel on November 19, 2024, 03:46:32 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on November 19, 2024, 03:23:45 PMI remember when conservatives used to be opposed to criminals getting off on a technicality.What technicality?The Supreme Court's creation of an evidentiary privilege for executive communications even when planning and committing felonies, for one.Arent felonies part of the official duties of a president yet? Trump clearly dawdled in his first administration.NOT that any Court found.