Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[bankshot1]

I let it go a year ago you fucking moron.

Yet here you are.

You always have to have the last word.

So, respond to this. It will let you have the last word.

p.s. I don't claim to be a saint. I wish you could admit a mistake.

How was I wrong in pointing out that Larry's post was misleading?

Even he admitted it was a mistake.

But his initial mea culpa was "it was 2016" it took some prodding IIRC to get him to admitting it was a mistake.

Now he's equivocating.

So what was my mistake?

Should I have ignored Larry'?

No one else read the stuff he posted, I did and saw the problem that no one else had the balls to call him on.

I treated Larry as I would anyone. I asked a question and let them answer.

His blackness does not prevent me from treating him as a man.
Even if it leads to some discomfort.
And Larry playing the race card, which he has a fondness for

Its unfortunate others here seem to empower that behavior. .
 
As to last word-this was literally over and forgotten a year ago, until Larry's butt started to ache.

Its not my concern I pierced his thin skin by reading his 2016 article and pointing out the problem with it.

AND LARRY its not my job to prove why your 2016 polling data about Kap and protests was irrelevant when applied to 2020 and America's feeling about George Floyd and protests. It was yours to make the case why it was. It was my job read the article, think about it, point out the issue which I thought misleading.

and thats what I did.

[facilitatorn]

For someone who talks so much shit, I have to ask UNO...

What have you done?

When have you put your body or livelihood at risk in support of a cause?

I don't have to justify my life to you or anyone else, but I have been officially commended by two governors of two different states for my contributions to society, and for actions taken to save several others' lives.

My 40+ year career was entirely in public service, and along the way I received numerous honors for my efforts to bring educational equity to others.

Retired from that arena, I now volunteer to provide food for the poor and the elderly in my diverse community.

And I invest well, which allows me to be financially independent.

Feel better?

Philly’s most obnoxious crossing guard.

You must have done the lord’s work, Uno, making sure all those bright eyed kids made it safely across the street to school day after day, year after year.

It’s not bad work for a craptacular moron and unlikely to have caused many children lasting harm.

[LarryBnDC]

I let it go a year ago you fucking moron.

Yet here you are.

You always have to have the last word.

So, respond to this. It will let you have the last word.

p.s. I don't claim to be a saint. I wish you could admit a mistake.

How was I wrong in pointing out that Larry's post was misleading?

Even he admitted it was a mistake.

But his initial mea culpa was "it was 2016" it took some prodding IIRC to get him to admitting it was a mistake.

Now he's equivocating.

So what was my mistake?

Should I have ignored Larry'?

No one else read the stuff he posted, I did and saw the problem that no one else had the balls to call him on.

I treated Larry as I would anyone. I asked a question and let them answer.

His blackness does not prevent me from treating him as a man.
Even if it leads to some discomfort.
And Larry playing the race card, which he has a fondness for

Its unfortunate others here seem to empower that behavior. .
 
As to last word-this was literally over and forgotten a year ago, until Larry's butt started to ache.

Its not my concern I pierced his thin skin by reading his 2016 article and pointing out the problem with it.

AND LARRY its not my job to prove why your 2016 polling data about Kap and protests was irrelevant when applied to 2020 and America's feeling about George Floyd and protests. It was yours. It was my job read the article, think about it, point out the issue which I thought misleading.

and thats what I did.

Banks,

What did the polling data state that wasn’t relevant?

Facts only now.

The mistake I made has been said over and over in fact I copped 8n the first response to you.

I admit I didn’t slob on your knob because that’s UNO’s job.

[bankshot1]

I let it go a year ago you fucking moron.

Yet here you are.

You always have to have the last word.

So, respond to this. It will let you have the last word.

p.s. I don't claim to be a saint. I wish you could admit a mistake.

How was I wrong in pointing out that Larry's post was misleading?

Even he admitted it was a mistake.

But his initial mea culpa was "it was 2016" it took some prodding IIRC to get him to admitting it was a mistake.

Now he's equivocating.

So what was my mistake?

Should I have ignored Larry'?

No one else read the stuff he posted, I did and saw the problem that no one else had the balls to call him on.

I treated Larry as I would anyone. I asked a question and let them answer.

His blackness does not prevent me from treating him as a man.
Even if it leads to some discomfort.
And Larry playing the race card, which he has a fondness for

Its unfortunate others here seem to empower that behavior. .
 
As to last word-this was literally over and forgotten a year ago, until Larry's butt started to ache.

Its not my concern I pierced his thin skin by reading his 2016 article and pointing out the problem with it.

AND LARRY its not my job to prove why your 2016 polling data about Kap and protests was irrelevant when applied to 2020 and America's feeling about George Floyd and protests. It was yours. It was my job read the article, think about it, point out the issue which I thought misleading.

and thats what I did.

Banks,

What did the polling data state that wasn’t relevant?

Facts only now.

The mistake I made has been said over and over in fact I copped 8n the first response to you.

I admit I didn’t slob on your knob because that’s UNO’s job.

From recall, You linked to an article which had 2016 polling data about America feeling about Kap and protests in 2016.

Your lead in to the link was "this week" as in June whenever 2020 and it was not 2020 but rather 2016. the 2016 poll had Americans 40-60 against Kap. At the time June 2020 Americans were 60-40 in favor of the Floyd street protests.

The implication was that majority of Americans in 2020 were against the protests of 2020.
And they were not.

Things had changed.

I asked you a question, that said, words to the effect, "Really, this week? Isn't this misleading?

And your initial response was "it was 2016".

that was it.

And then I asked a few more questions.

And then eventually you said it was a mistake.

and then it was forgotten.

NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF

And those are facts

[LarryBnDC]

I let it go a year ago you fucking moron.

Yet here you are.

You always have to have the last word.

So, respond to this. It will let you have the last word.

p.s. I don't claim to be a saint. I wish you could admit a mistake.

How was I wrong in pointing out that Larry's post was misleading?

Even he admitted it was a mistake.

But his initial mea culpa was "it was 2016" it took some prodding IIRC to get him to admitting it was a mistake.

Now he's equivocating.

So what was my mistake?

Should I have ignored Larry'?

No one else read the stuff he posted, I did and saw the problem that no one else had the balls to call him on.

I treated Larry as I would anyone. I asked a question and let them answer.

His blackness does not prevent me from treating him as a man.
Even if it leads to some discomfort.
And Larry playing the race card, which he has a fondness for

Its unfortunate others here seem to empower that behavior. .
 
As to last word-this was literally over and forgotten a year ago, until Larry's butt started to ache.

Its not my concern I pierced his thin skin by reading his 2016 article and pointing out the problem with it.

AND LARRY its not my job to prove why your 2016 polling data about Kap and protests was irrelevant when applied to 2020 and America's feeling about George Floyd and protests. It was yours. It was my job read the article, think about it, point out the issue which I thought misleading.

and thats what I did.

Banks,

What did the polling data state that wasn’t relevant?

Facts only now.

The mistake I made has been said over and over in fact I copped 8n the first response to you.

I admit I didn’t slob on your knob because that’s UNO’s job.

From recall, You linked to an article which had 2016 polling data about America feeling about Kap and protests in 2016.

Your lead in to the link was "this week" as in June whenever 2020 and it was not 2020 but rather 2016. At the time June 2020 Americans were 60-40 in favor of the protests.

The implication was that Americans in 2020 were against the protests of 2020.
And they were not.

Things had changed.

I asked you a question, that said, words to the effect, "Really, this week? Isn't this misleading?

And your initial response was "it was 2016".

that was it.

And then I asked a few more questions.

And then eventually you said it was a mistake.

and then it was forgotten.

NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF

And those are facts

Aside from the “THIS WEEK” admittedly left in the pull quote the data was relevant to the fac America had come around to Kaps perspective ergo

AMERICA HAD ITS CHANCE TO SUPPORT PEACEFUL PROTEST

which renders your entire argument bullheaded and moot

Now you go fuck a knot in a pine fence.

I’m sure you will fit.

[LarryBnDC]

And your initial response was "it was 2016".

Which was an admission of error!

Now go fuck UNO and be decent enough to give him a reach around., just make sure the tweezers aren’t sharp.

[bankshot1]

So Larry was comfortable portraying 2016 polling data as 2020 polling data.

Larry could have stated his POV in his post, but there was nothing.

Just the words "this week"

Larry could have quoted 2016 and 2020 data but choose not to compare and contrast

The implication for the reader was that Americans were still 40-60 against protests in 2020.

And Larry was called on that.

SSDD

[bankshot1]

And your initial response was "it was 2016".

Which was an admission of error!

Now go fuck UNO and be decent enough to give him a reach around., just make sure the tweezers aren’t sharp.

thats a helluva transparent admission of error.

Only if you read the poll would a reader understand your mistake.

Its been my experience when I made a mistake, as rare as that may be, is to say, "I made a mistake, I was wrong"

I never said anything about 2016 or accused you of anything more than you posting something which was misleading.

And your admission was "it was 2016".

weak Larry, very very weak

[LarryBnDC]

So Larry was comfortable portraying 2016 polling data as 2020 polling data.

Larry could have stated his POV in his post, but there was nothing.

Just the words "this week"

Larry could have quoted 2016 and 2020 data but choose not to compare and contrast

The implication for the reader was that Americans were still 40-60 against protests in 2020.

And Larry was called on that.

SSDD

The quote was from 2016 and the quote clearly stated my POV.

You’re just too big an asshole you blew a little smoke into a stupid fire.

[LarryBnDC]

And your initial response was "it was 2016".

Which was an admission of error!

Now go fuck UNO and be decent enough to give him a reach around., just make sure the tweezers aren’t sharp.

thats a helluva transparent admission of error.

Only if you read the poll would a reader understand your mistake.

Its been my experience when I made a mistake, as rare as that may be, is to say, "I made a mistake, I was wrong"

I never said anything about 2016 or accused you of anything more than you posting something which was misleading.

And your admission was "it was 2016".

weak Larry, very very weak

Most people would read the quote and then click the link. That’s why it’s called a pull quote!

Unless they were just being intellectually lazy like the people who go the comments secti9n to rail about the content they hadn’t bothered to read.

Sounds about right.

You didn’t read the article but instead went straight to contrary

That’s just fucking foolish





“Its been my experience when I made a mistake, as rare as that may be, is to say, "I made a mistake, I was wrong"

Get the fuck out of here!

When have you ever admitted to being wrong on anything?

You’re argument is getting weaker by the post as you admit you are too thickheaded to be rational.

[bankshot1]

So Larry was comfortable portraying 2016 polling data as 2020 polling data.

Larry could have stated his POV in his post, but there was nothing.

Just the words "this week"

Larry could have quoted 2016 and 2020 data but choose not to compare and contrast

The implication for the reader was that Americans were still 40-60 against protests in 2020.

And Larry was called on that.

SSDD

The quote was from 2016 and the quote clearly stated my POV.

You’re just too big an asshole you blew a little smoke into a stupid fire.

There was no quote Larry, just a link and the words "this week" the implication being it was 2020.

The POV about Kap in 2016 was inside the linked article.

Unless you wrote the article you can't claim ownership of that article or the author's POV.

that would be plagiarism, Larry

And I asked you if the post was misleading.

Most rational people would understand the issue.

You can't because you're either too stubborn or too thin skinned to accept accountability for what you post.


Poor sad Larry I read the article which was how I knew the misleading problem existed.

Larry characterizing you as intellectually dishonest is a very fair way to describe your duplicitous nature

[LarryBnDC]

So Larry was comfortable portraying 2016 polling data as 2020 polling data.

Larry could have stated his POV in his post, but there was nothing.

Just the words "this week"

Larry could have quoted 2016 and 2020 data but choose not to compare and contrast

The implication for the reader was that Americans were still 40-60 against protests in 2020.

And Larry was called on that.

SSDD

The quote was from 2016 and the quote clearly stated my POV.

You’re just too big an asshole you blew a little smoke into a stupid fire.

There was no quote Larry, just a link and the words "this week" the implication being it was 2020.

The POV about Kap in 2016 was inside the linked article.

Unless you wrote the article you can't claim ownership of that article or the author's POV.

that would be plagiarism, Larry

And I asked you if the post was misleading.

Most rational people would understand the issue.

You can't because you're either too stubborn or too thin skinned to accept accountability for what you post.

It was a paragraph lifted directly from the article with words “this week” in the body of the opening sentence. It was not just the words this week and unless you can prove  those were the only two words you should just give it up before stroke out

The only thing I wrote was “America, you had your chance...”

Just admit you took a termite mound and made it into Mt. Everest.

[bankshot1]

And fwiw, and this should be obvious by now, Larry is just misleading Elba once again.

Perhaps treating Larry as a man was my mistake, as he's acting like a spoiled child.

[LarryBnDC]

And fwiw, and this should be obvious by now, Larry is just misleading Elba once again.

Perhaps treating Larry as a man was my mistake, as he's acting like a spoiled child.

Come on banks

You made a conclusion now show your work

PROVE “This week” was the only quote above the link.

You can’t because that’s not true


I did not mislead the form

You’re falling back in that because that’s all you got.

Looking for a lifeline Banks?

It ain’t coming.

You’re wrong and you’re too big a schmuck to admit it.

[kidcarter8]

Shhh.....

Chill and watch THE CHI