I wouldn't pay $15.00 a month for Maher.
Oh... Same argument then. I get it. So yeah, there might be a couple of clowns arguing that progress in the rights of Gays (or African-Americans) has not been made; it's still a fair argument that not enough progress has been made and not fast enough. Guess which "argument" the Maher's of the world focus on.
Yes more progress can always be made on anything. Social change takes time to change hearts and minds and laws.
But that was not Maher's point.
Maher's point I believe is that the avoidance of facts by the oh so woke is a problem.
As best as I can tell you and I are the only one to have seen Maher's comments in their entirety, or I know I did. Yet once the tone was set down by Elba's council of woke, that Maher is just a spoiled pot-smoking libertarian, taking a white boy's path of priviledge, yada, yada, yada, the politically correct view had been established, all without watching the actual editorial.
So a fact-free condemnation, mostly because the messengers sit outside the council.
Elba proved Maher's point.