Total Members Voted: 11
Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM
Quote from: Yankguy1 on August 11, 2021, 11:56:13 AMQuote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.Upgrading public understanding of Federalism is not Red's agenda here. It is more a crusade. Of one.
Quote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.
Clearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnn
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 07:25:14 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 10, 2021, 07:08:55 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 06:36:52 PMA fuller explanation of her position is that she favors reallocation to community building which would reduce the need for armed enforcers but not eliminate them. So, already, we arrive at the need to distinguish between elimination of police and reallocating funds so they are a smaller portion of all social services. Which does she advocate? Going beyond sound bites...The police Department is not a social service. It’s job is law enforcement.So protecting the public is not a service to society? Apprehension of criminals is not a service to society? That's an interesting definition, and seems debatable.Quote Cori Bush has no connection to its purpose or its responsibilities to municipalities and local governments....So she's NOT representing a congressional district in St. Louis?? And what those constituents want from those assigned to protect them and keep the peace? Wow, that's a fascinating take on democracy! Semantics, much?
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 10, 2021, 07:08:55 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 06:36:52 PMA fuller explanation of her position is that she favors reallocation to community building which would reduce the need for armed enforcers but not eliminate them. So, already, we arrive at the need to distinguish between elimination of police and reallocating funds so they are a smaller portion of all social services. Which does she advocate? Going beyond sound bites...The police Department is not a social service. It’s job is law enforcement.So protecting the public is not a service to society? Apprehension of criminals is not a service to society? That's an interesting definition, and seems debatable.Quote Cori Bush has no connection to its purpose or its responsibilities to municipalities and local governments....So she's NOT representing a congressional district in St. Louis?? And what those constituents want from those assigned to protect them and keep the peace? Wow, that's a fascinating take on democracy!
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 06:36:52 PMA fuller explanation of her position is that she favors reallocation to community building which would reduce the need for armed enforcers but not eliminate them. So, already, we arrive at the need to distinguish between elimination of police and reallocating funds so they are a smaller portion of all social services. Which does she advocate? Going beyond sound bites...The police Department is not a social service. It’s job is law enforcement.
A fuller explanation of her position is that she favors reallocation to community building which would reduce the need for armed enforcers but not eliminate them. So, already, we arrive at the need to distinguish between elimination of police and reallocating funds so they are a smaller portion of all social services. Which does she advocate? Going beyond sound bites...
Cori Bush has no connection to its purpose or its responsibilities to municipalities and local governments....
Quote from: bambu. on August 11, 2021, 04:33:52 PMThe Taliban will be totally in control of all of Afghanistan in about 90 days.Kabul will fall soon, then the rest of the country.Same thing will happen in America if the patriots disappear.Long live patriots who love the flag and the nationalanthem.Federal govt should issue a National Patriot Card to all prepared to swear allegiance to the USA above all others.USA Uber alles!
The Taliban will be totally in control of all of Afghanistan in about 90 days.Kabul will fall soon, then the rest of the country.Same thing will happen in America if the patriots disappear.Long live patriots who love the flag and the nationalanthem.Federal govt should issue a National Patriot Card to all prepared to swear allegiance to the USA above all others.
Quote from: kidcarter8 on August 11, 2021, 01:29:01 PM"Maddow" finished behind 12 different Fox News programs in the demo, as "Tucker Carlson Tonight," "Hannity," "The Five," "The Ingraham Angle," "Special Report with Bret Baier," "Gutfeld!," "Fox News Primetime," Your World with Neil Cavuto," Outnumbered," "The Story with Martha MacCallum," "Fox & Friends" and "America Reports" all finished with larger audiences than MSNBC’s most popular program in the key category. Meanwhile, MSNBC’s flagship morning program "Morning Joe" failed to crack 100,000 demo viewers for the first time since October 2015. https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-strugglesHL Mencken had a famous quote about that....No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.
"Maddow" finished behind 12 different Fox News programs in the demo, as "Tucker Carlson Tonight," "Hannity," "The Five," "The Ingraham Angle," "Special Report with Bret Baier," "Gutfeld!," "Fox News Primetime," Your World with Neil Cavuto," Outnumbered," "The Story with Martha MacCallum," "Fox & Friends" and "America Reports" all finished with larger audiences than MSNBC’s most popular program in the key category. Meanwhile, MSNBC’s flagship morning program "Morning Joe" failed to crack 100,000 demo viewers for the first time since October 2015. https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-struggles
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 11, 2021, 01:39:27 PMQuote from: kidcarter8 on August 11, 2021, 01:29:01 PM"Maddow" finished behind 12 different Fox News programs in the demo, as "Tucker Carlson Tonight," "Hannity," "The Five," "The Ingraham Angle," "Special Report with Bret Baier," "Gutfeld!," "Fox News Primetime," Your World with Neil Cavuto," Outnumbered," "The Story with Martha MacCallum," "Fox & Friends" and "America Reports" all finished with larger audiences than MSNBC’s most popular program in the key category. Meanwhile, MSNBC’s flagship morning program "Morning Joe" failed to crack 100,000 demo viewers for the first time since October 2015. https://www.foxnews.com/media/msnbc-strugglesHL Mencken had a famous quote about that....No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public.That quote can’t be found attributable to Mencken.However:What Mencken (1880-1956) did write, in the Sept. 19, 1926 edition of the Chicago Daily Tribune, was: “No one in this world, so far as I know — and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me — has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.”Wikipedia defines “ Plains People” The Plains tribes are usually divided into two broad classifications which overlap to some degree. The first group became a fully nomadic horse culture during the 18th and 19th centuries, following the vast herds of buffalo, although some tribes occasionally engaged in agriculture. These include the Arapaho, Assiniboine, Blackfoot, Cheyenne, Comanche, Crow, Gros Ventre, Kiowa, Lakota, Lipan, Plains Apache (or Kiowa Apache), Plains Cree, Plains Ojibwe, Sarsi, Nakoda (Stoney), and Tonkawa. The second group were sedentary and semi-sedentary, and, in addition to hunting buffalo, they lived in villages, raised crops, and actively traded with other tribes. These include the Arikara, Hidatsa, Iowa, Kaw (or Kansa), Kitsai, Mandan, Missouria, Omaha, Osage, Otoe, Pawnee, Ponca, Quapaw, Wichita, and the Santee Dakota, Yanktonai and Yankton Dakota.
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 11, 2021, 01:17:41 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on August 11, 2021, 11:56:13 AMQuote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.Upgrading public understanding of Federalism is not Red's agenda here. It is more a crusade. Of one. The public understanding of Federalism is well documented.It is comforting to know the US Senate, in the question of defunding the police, stands as one in staying out of local decisions.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 11, 2021, 05:31:11 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 11, 2021, 01:17:41 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on August 11, 2021, 11:56:13 AMQuote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.Upgrading public understanding of Federalism is not Red's agenda here. It is more a crusade. Of one. The public understanding of Federalism is well documented.It is comforting to know the US Senate, in the question of defunding the police, stands as one in staying out of local decisions....unless the local decision is the "wrong" one.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on August 11, 2021, 05:51:56 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 11, 2021, 05:31:11 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 11, 2021, 01:17:41 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on August 11, 2021, 11:56:13 AMQuote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.Upgrading public understanding of Federalism is not Red's agenda here. It is more a crusade. Of one. The public understanding of Federalism is well documented.It is comforting to know the US Senate, in the question of defunding the police, stands as one in staying out of local decisions....unless the local decision is the "wrong" one.What would be the “ wrong” decision?
Quote from: facilitatorn on August 10, 2021, 05:07:37 PMWomen are smarter, Hammy. Not sure where that leaves eunuchs like you.Your gender bias is noted.
Women are smarter, Hammy. Not sure where that leaves eunuchs like you.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 11, 2021, 06:09:21 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on August 11, 2021, 05:51:56 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on August 11, 2021, 05:31:11 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 11, 2021, 01:17:41 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on August 11, 2021, 11:56:13 AMQuote from: josh on August 11, 2021, 09:59:00 AMClearly the issue of defunding or not defunding the police (as well as what it means) involves national politicians in the Senate, the House, and the White House.How do I know that? Because Senator Tuberville put forth an amendment calling for punishment of communities that defund their police,Senator Booker was excited about that proposed amendment:https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2021/08/11/cory-booker-tommy-tuberville-defund-the-police-newday-vpx.cnnI'm sure Coach Tuberville can draw up a game plan, but I assume that Red is embarrassed by good coach's grasp of federalism.Upgrading public understanding of Federalism is not Red's agenda here. It is more a crusade. Of one. The public understanding of Federalism is well documented.It is comforting to know the US Senate, in the question of defunding the police, stands as one in staying out of local decisions....unless the local decision is the "wrong" one.What would be the “ wrong” decision?LOL. Bait a different hook.
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 06:10:54 PMQuote from: Hamilton Samuels on August 10, 2021, 02:57:14 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 01:18:40 PMMy guess is that the reason a majority see the Squad and other new Democrats as denigrating law enforcement is because they are absorbing the narrative of the Right, promoted widely on social media and right-leaning media outlets. If you actually listen to what the new Dems are saying, it doesn't quite fit that narrative, but who has time to read or research, 'miright? Just go with the soundbite!Bad guess.Thanks for demonstrating my point. Omar, por ejemplo, wants a federal oversight committee for local policing. Her proposals have come under quite valid criticism. I'll pause while you develop your "point".
Quote from: Hamilton Samuels on August 10, 2021, 02:57:14 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 01:18:40 PMMy guess is that the reason a majority see the Squad and other new Democrats as denigrating law enforcement is because they are absorbing the narrative of the Right, promoted widely on social media and right-leaning media outlets. If you actually listen to what the new Dems are saying, it doesn't quite fit that narrative, but who has time to read or research, 'miright? Just go with the soundbite!Bad guess.Thanks for demonstrating my point.
Quote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 01:18:40 PMMy guess is that the reason a majority see the Squad and other new Democrats as denigrating law enforcement is because they are absorbing the narrative of the Right, promoted widely on social media and right-leaning media outlets. If you actually listen to what the new Dems are saying, it doesn't quite fit that narrative, but who has time to read or research, 'miright? Just go with the soundbite!Bad guess.
My guess is that the reason a majority see the Squad and other new Democrats as denigrating law enforcement is because they are absorbing the narrative of the Right, promoted widely on social media and right-leaning media outlets. If you actually listen to what the new Dems are saying, it doesn't quite fit that narrative, but who has time to read or research, 'miright? Just go with the soundbite!
Quote from: Hamilton Samuels on August 11, 2021, 05:28:05 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 06:10:54 PMQuote from: Hamilton Samuels on August 10, 2021, 02:57:14 PMQuote from: Barton3.0 on August 10, 2021, 01:18:40 PMMy guess is that the reason a majority see the Squad and other new Democrats as denigrating law enforcement is because they are absorbing the narrative of the Right, promoted widely on social media and right-leaning media outlets. If you actually listen to what the new Dems are saying, it doesn't quite fit that narrative, but who has time to read or research, 'miright? Just go with the soundbite!Bad guess.Thanks for demonstrating my point. Omar, por ejemplo, wants a federal oversight committee for local policing. Her proposals have come under quite valid criticism. I'll pause while you develop your "point".Policing is local but the policing problem is national.