Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[Hamilton Samuels]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

I sure Ham will get back to you OC.

But to be clear.

OC did you EVER laugh at a racist or sexist or any type of prejudicial joke which today we might find racist/sexist/prejudicial?

Did you ever do anything in your past, anything, let's say decades ago, which changes in society made you re-examine your behavior?

I have.

But I try to moderate my behavior now and become a better person.

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

Is there a statute of limitations for behavior decades ago?

I think that's the woke line most reasonable people start to balk at.

I've used examples here of the intolerance of the woke.

Pointing their fingers at others, who weren't smart enough to erase posts or tweets or photographs or any other evidence when they were young and dumb. 

I read a few weeks ago in this forum some fucking moron compared Hugh Hefner's treatment of women to Hitler's treatment of Jews.

Can you believe that open anti-semitic trope would be allowed in Elba?

Hefner just as bad a Hitler?

And with all the woke motherfuckers in here, I was the only one to question the offensive comparison.

How fucking asleep did that moron have to be to make that comparison?

How indifferent to the extermination of millions of people by a monster did that moron have to be to even draw that comparison?

The fucking hypocrisy is astounding.

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com/articles/effects-of-ivermectin-therapy-on-the-sperm-functions-of-nigerian-onchocerciasis-patients.pdf

I have always thought that if you are inclined to do anything Alex Jones wants you to do that you should be sterilized

Now you are.

[facilitatorn]

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

The last one depends largely on why she dumped you but please keep it to yourself

People only remember Hefner for the articles

At least that is what they keep telling me.

[Hairy Lime]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

Perspective is as it is.

If you think that the Wokies are NOT bigots and or that they do not act to reduce groups of people for their own political and to propagate their own "view of history", then you are lost.

Forrest calling others Nathan Bedford. No surprise.

Try not to tell me what arguments I should make. It's pedantic and boring.

You do this routinely with African Americans, especially those who support BLM. As one of many examples.

[Hairy Lime]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

I sure Ham will get back to you OC.

But to be clear.

OC did you EVER laugh at a racist or sexist or any type of prejudicial joke which today we might find racist/sexist/prejudicial?

Did you ever do anything in your past, anything, let's say decades ago, which changes in society made you re-examine your behavior?

I have.

But I try to moderate my behavior now and become a better person.

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

Is there a statute of limitations for behavior decades ago?

I think that's the woke line most reasonable people start to balk at.

I've used examples here of the intolerance of the woke.

Pointing their fingers at others, who weren't smart enough to erase posts or tweets or photographs or any other evidence when they were young and dumb. 

I read a few weeks ago in this forum some fucking moron compared Hugh Hefner's treatment of women to Hitler's treatment of Jews.

Can you believe that open anti-semitic trope would be allowed in Elba?

Hefner just as bad a Hitler?

And with all the woke motherfuckers in here, I was the only one to question the offensive comparison.

How fucking asleep did that moron have to be to make that comparison?

How indifferent to the extermination of millions of people by a monster did that moron have to be to even draw that comparison?

The fucking hypocrisy is astounding.

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

Like Ham, you support a very specific pro-Israeli wokeness. And are prepared to go all the way  across into anyone's ancient history for it.

[bankshot1]

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

The last one depends largely on why she dumped you but please keep it to yourself

People only remember Hefner for the articles

At least that is what they keep telling me.

Unfortunately she wasn't as dumb as I thought.

The Playboy interviews were usually pretty good.

Fac you strike me as more a Penthouse or Hustler guy.

As a matter of fac, I'm pretty sure you adopted your writing style, depravity toned down with a naivety, from Letters to Penthouse.

Right?

HEH

[Hamilton Samuels]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

Perspective is as it is.

If you think that the Wokies are NOT bigots and or that they do not act to reduce groups of people for their own political and to propagate their own "view of history", then you are lost.

Forrest calling others Nathan Bedford. No surprise.

Try not to tell me what arguments I should make. It's pedantic and boring.

You do this routinely with African Americans, especially those who support BLM. As one of many examples.

No. I don't. But keep spreading lies, Joey Gee.

[bankshot1]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

I sure Ham will get back to you OC.

But to be clear.

OC did you EVER laugh at a racist or sexist or any type of prejudicial joke which today we might find racist/sexist/prejudicial?

Did you ever do anything in your past, anything, let's say decades ago, which changes in society made you re-examine your behavior?

I have.

But I try to moderate my behavior now and become a better person.

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

Is there a statute of limitations for behavior decades ago?

I think that's the woke line most reasonable people start to balk at.

I've used examples here of the intolerance of the woke.

Pointing their fingers at others, who weren't smart enough to erase posts or tweets or photographs or any other evidence when they were young and dumb. 

I read a few weeks ago in this forum some fucking moron compared Hugh Hefner's treatment of women to Hitler's treatment of Jews.

Can you believe that open anti-semitic trope would be allowed in Elba?

Hefner just as bad a Hitler?

And with all the woke motherfuckers in here, I was the only one to question the offensive comparison.

How fucking asleep did that moron have to be to make that comparison?

How indifferent to the extermination of millions of people by a monster did that moron have to be to even draw that comparison?

The fucking hypocrisy is astounding.

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

Like Ham, you support a very specific pro-Israeli wokeness. And are prepared to go all the way  across into anyone's ancient history for it.

Boz Im not as much pro-Israel (I've posted my problems with current day Israel) as I am anti-Auschwitz.

You know Poland's WW2 Disney land.

But Stanislaw, change the subject from my specific problem with the Hitler comp, which you seem to ignore, to your false strawman,
 

[Hamilton Samuels]

Must see tv, tonight: https://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/american-crime-story

Revising history for the Woke Era.

Just so we're clear, Hamster:

When I see a post that uses terms of bigotry or racism, basically any term that reduces a group of people, I will not bother to read further. Terms like woke, appropriated sarcastically, are functionally the same as any other term of bigotry.  If there is, in actuality, some reason we should not value being awakened to the past effects of racism and its present reverberations, then make that argument.  If you think a traditional view of history is the correct one, and a revision will be false in some way, then make that argument.

I sure Ham will get back to you OC.

But to be clear.

OC did you EVER laugh at a racist or sexist or any type of prejudicial joke which today we might find racist/sexist/prejudicial?

Did you ever do anything in your past, anything, let's say decades ago, which changes in society made you re-examine your behavior?

I have.

But I try to moderate my behavior now and become a better person.

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

Is there a statute of limitations for behavior decades ago?

I think that's the woke line most reasonable people start to balk at.

I've used examples here of the intolerance of the woke.

Pointing their fingers at others, who weren't smart enough to erase posts or tweets or photographs or any other evidence when they were young and dumb. 

I read a few weeks ago in this forum some fucking moron compared Hugh Hefner's treatment of women to Hitler's treatment of Jews.

Can you believe that open anti-semitic trope would be allowed in Elba?

Hefner just as bad a Hitler?

And with all the woke motherfuckers in here, I was the only one to question the offensive comparison.

How fucking asleep did that moron have to be to make that comparison?

How indifferent to the extermination of millions of people by a monster did that moron have to be to even draw that comparison?

The fucking hypocrisy is astounding.

WAKE THE FUCK UP.

Like Ham, you support a very specific pro-Israeli wokeness. And are prepared to go all the way  across into anyone's ancient history for it.

So says the Pope's ambassador to Elba.

[Hamilton Samuels]

Here is someone for whom bambu should discuss issues of the day: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/09/07/australia-talking-duck-bloody-fool/

[facilitatorn]

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

The last one depends largely on why she dumped you but please keep it to yourself

People only remember Hefner for the articles

At least that is what they keep telling me.

Unfortunately she wasn't as dumb as I thought.

The Playboy interviews were usually pretty good.

Fac you strike me as more a Penthouse or Hustler guy.

As a matter of fac, I'm pretty sure you adopted your writing style, depravity toned down with a naivety, from Letters to Penthouse.

Right?

HEH

I tailor my writing style here to fit the audience

Put whatever stains on it you need to

When Hammy was in Hustler he used to go by Chester a name that fit him better.

[Holly Martins]

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

Is there a statute of limitations for behavior decades ago?

I think that's the woke line most reasonable people start to balk at.

I think the counterpoint is that woke,  in the main,  is not some humorless lockstep of overreaction.   I think that's why misusing the term is perceived as stereotyping.   Sometimes woke does just mean aware,  and knowledgeable of why some minorities joined the footrace carrying twenty pound weights in each hand.   It simply means understanding that all effects of discrimination don't vanish when,  on the sixth lap,  they're permitted to drop the weights.   

[bankshot1]

But should I be hung for laughing at a red-neck joke, or a dumb-blonde joke? Or dating a dumb blonde?

The last one depends largely on why she dumped you but please keep it to yourself

People only remember Hefner for the articles

At least that is what they keep telling me.

Unfortunately she wasn't as dumb as I thought.

The Playboy interviews were usually pretty good.

Fac you strike me as more a Penthouse or Hustler guy.

As a matter of fac, I'm pretty sure you adopted your writing style, depravity toned down with a naivety, from Letters to Penthouse.

Right?

HEH

I tailor my writing style here to fit the audience

Put whatever stains on it you need to

When Hammy was in Hustler he used to go by Chester a name that fit him better.

I'm just having some fun poking some holes in the Elba's SJW.

So you're familiar with Hustler, ok, now we're getting somewhere.

You bought it for the classifieds, looking for older men to guide you, right?

Did you ever surf the web for porn?

Did you ever laugh at a joke which may have been prejudicial, racist or sexist?

Or were you always pure of mind and pure of intent?

[bambu.]

Those are two of the three qualifications to become a presenter for Sky News

2 are sometimes misguided...the rest are great...spot on.

[josh]

We don't watch videos that Ham uses to "make a point." We don't watch most videos, unless given actual information about the content.

Nobody "pokes a hole" in other posters any more than they "mop the floor" with them or "crush them" or any other substitutes for "I wrote something that I think does a good job of making fun of them!"

Writing "to fit the audience" does nothing to the parts of the audience you are ostensibly addressing, while turning off some of those who agree with you, in general.

"Tit for tat," the single most common "game" here at Elba has to be one of the most boring things ever and I will probably try (again) to stop.

Petty personal insults are not cause to be banned. They are more indicative of the writer than anything else. <facetiousness> (And anybody who disagrees with me is a poopy head!) </facetiousness>