Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[LarryBnDC]

Bowdens attorney Steven Mitby said the doctor has treated more than 2,000 patients with Covid 19 at her private practice and that none of them have ended up in the hospital.
Her early treatment methods work and are saving lives, he added.
Dr. Bowden has the utmost respect for Houston Methodist and is proud of the work she has done along with her colleagues at Houston Methodist.
Bowdens Twitter account shows a series of tweets praising the anti parasitic drug ivermectin. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration have cautioned people against using the drug to treat Covid 19, CNN has reported.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/13/us/houston-doctor-suspended-covid-19/index.html

Having her ATTORNEY speak to her medical track record is just not especially convincing, Kid. We've gone down this road with you before.

Where is the independent corroboration of this amazing unmatched in the country track record?!

I would think the attorney's statement would be easily refuted if incorrect

How, if she is the only one with the medical records? The hospitals can't say, "Wait! We had one of her patients!"

There is NO evidence available, Kid. Just hearsay. Unsubstantiated claims.

Does not matter as long as one has faith.

TRUE BELIEVER

[Hamilton Samuels]

Good piece, referencing Lincoln's contemporary critics, and clarifying his status as a pragmatic moderate.

https://medium.com/frame-of-reference/abraham-lincoln-was-president-he-was-moderate-99991d2fc15f

[Hairy Lime]

That's wholly unAmerican, and you should know it.

The middle is where the path to the future lies.

Even Lincoln knew that.


Yes.

After he got through KICKING THEIR ASS!

For the record, in 1850/60s terms, Lincoln started as a moderate on slavery, and moved towards the radical position bit by bit.

Lincoln was elected with 40 per cent of the popular vote and was not on the ballot in 10 southern states. His electoral votes came entirely from the north where slavery had already been abolished.

And? Lincoln was originally a moderate on the slavery issue, wanting to leave it alone in the South and prevent its expansion. Much of the tension in his presidency came from balancing his moderate position with his need for radical support. In the end he resolved the balance by radicalizing, not moderating, his position.

And?
His stated goal was to save the Union.
Whether it included slavery or not.
What is radical about that.?

1862 happened. And 1865.

Nice dodge.
I repeat.

What was radical about the  Lincoln Presidency?

Starting in 1862 through1865 his views on slavery became increasingly radical, sea lion.

[Hairy Lime]

Bowdens attorney Steven Mitby said the doctor has treated more than 2,000 patients with Covid 19 at her private practice and that none of them have ended up in the hospital.
Her early treatment methods work and are saving lives, he added.
Dr. Bowden has the utmost respect for Houston Methodist and is proud of the work she has done along with her colleagues at Houston Methodist.
Bowdens Twitter account shows a series of tweets praising the anti parasitic drug ivermectin. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration have cautioned people against using the drug to treat Covid 19, CNN has reported.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/13/us/houston-doctor-suspended-covid-19/index.html

Having her ATTORNEY speak to her medical track record is just not especially convincing, Kid. We've gone down this road with you before.

Where is the independent corroboration of this amazing unmatched in the country track record?!

I would think the attorney's statement would be easily refuted if incorrect

How, if she is the only one with the medical records? The hospitals can't say, "Wait! We had one of her patients!"

There is NO evidence available, Kid. Just hearsay. Unsubstantiated claims.

And nothing with any measure of scientific proof.

[FlyingVProd]

Bambu, as the work camps form in the future to build the bridges and high speed rail, etc, they can have food trucks for food, and on the weekends they can have parties with roasted pigs and with kegs of beer, and with live bands, etc. The work camps can be fun places. And the Australians can send bands to play at the work camps in the USA.

One person from Australia who can perform at the work camps here in the USA is Orianthi. Orianthi would connect well with the hard workers who are working at the work camps, she is bluesy, and soulful. She can be the Australian version of Woody Guthrie. Orianthi needs to perform for the workers at the work camps.

Salute,

Tony V.

[kidcarter8]

And nothing with any measure of scientific proof.


hahahahahahaha

[REDSTATEWARD]

That's wholly unAmerican, and you should know it.

The middle is where the path to the future lies.

Even Lincoln knew that.


Yes.

After he got through KICKING THEIR ASS!

For the record, in 1850/60s terms, Lincoln started as a moderate on slavery, and moved towards the radical position bit by bit.

Lincoln was elected with 40 per cent of the popular vote and was not on the ballot in 10 southern states. His electoral votes came entirely from the north where slavery had already been abolished.

And? Lincoln was originally a moderate on the slavery issue, wanting to leave it alone in the South and prevent its expansion. Much of the tension in his presidency came from balancing his moderate position with his need for radical support. In the end he resolved the balance by radicalizing, not moderating, his position.

And?
His stated goal was to save the Union.
Whether it included slavery or not.
What is radical about that.?

1862 happened. And 1865.

Nice dodge.
I repeat.

What was radical about the  Lincoln Presidency?

Starting in 1862 through1865 his views on slavery became increasingly radical, sea lion.

Radical?
How?

[facilitatorn]

Good piece, referencing Lincoln's contemporary critics, and clarifying his status as a pragmatic moderate.

https://medium.com/frame-of-reference/abraham-lincoln-was-president-he-was-moderate-99991d2fc15f

So Lincoln pragmatically and moderately ordered the mowing down and plowing in of whole fields of rebels for year after year ongoing until they agreed to set aside their arms and rejoin the Union.

Jan 6 was our Sumpter. Bannon and Prince and Flynn are competing for the role of Stonewall Jackson. I am waiting for the moderate and pragmatic action now comprehensive, punitive, and spectacular enough to forstall the moderate and pragmatic exchange of lead, bombs, and drones in towns across the country that the right wing seditionist yahoo dirtbags of our day are steadily dragging us toward.

What Lincoln did not have was a DHS, FBI, Patriot Act, or RICO laws.

If Jeff Davis and friends were all busy on different chain gangs, does the south even manage to succeed? In authoritarian structures, like hives and nests, you can do immense structural damage by removing all the potential queens.

That is the current moderate pragmatic approach. Just ask Liz Cheney.

[Hairy Lime]

That's wholly unAmerican, and you should know it.

The middle is where the path to the future lies.

Even Lincoln knew that.


Yes.

After he got through KICKING THEIR ASS!

For the record, in 1850/60s terms, Lincoln started as a moderate on slavery, and moved towards the radical position bit by bit.

Lincoln was elected with 40 per cent of the popular vote and was not on the ballot in 10 southern states. His electoral votes came entirely from the north where slavery had already been abolished.

And? Lincoln was originally a moderate on the slavery issue, wanting to leave it alone in the South and prevent its expansion. Much of the tension in his presidency came from balancing his moderate position with his need for radical support. In the end he resolved the balance by radicalizing, not moderating, his position.

And?
His stated goal was to save the Union.
Whether it included slavery or not.
What is radical about that.?

1862 happened. And 1865.

Nice dodge.
I repeat.

What was radical about the  Lincoln Presidency?

Starting in 1862 through1865 his views on slavery became increasingly radical, sea lion.

Radical?
How?

Enough sardines for you.

[Hamilton Samuels]

Good piece, referencing Lincoln's contemporary critics, and clarifying his status as a pragmatic moderate.

https://medium.com/frame-of-reference/abraham-lincoln-was-president-he-was-moderate-99991d2fc15f

So Lincoln pragmatically and moderately ordered the mowing down and plowing in of whole fields of rebels for year after year ongoing until they agreed to set aside their arms and rejoin the Union.

Jan 6 was our Sumpter. Bannon and Prince and Flynn are competing for the role of Stonewall Jackson. I am waiting for the moderate and pragmatic action now comprehensive, punitive, and spectacular enough to forstall the moderate and pragmatic exchange of lead, bombs, and drones in towns across the country that the right wing seditionist yahoo dirtbags of our day are steadily dragging us toward.

What Lincoln did not have was a DHS, FBI, Patriot Act, or RICO laws.

If Jeff Davis and friends were all busy on different chain gangs, does the south even manage to succeed? In authoritarian structures, like hives and nests, you can do immense structural damage by removing all the potential queens.

That is the current moderate pragmatic approach. Just ask Liz Cheney.

Get help.

[facilitatorn]

http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2021/11/16/2064635/-Flynn-Wanted-DOD-Official-to-Help-Him-Seize-Ballots

[facilitatorn]

Get help.

Against the million armed yahoos of yall Qaeda, in and out of government, more help is always welcome.

[josh]

For the lying scum who have tried to respond to Black Lives Matter with "All lives matter," I offer this:



You do not believe all lives matter. You only believe in saying whatever will let you get your way.

It's not news. This is just a reminder --> you are transparent.

[LarryBnDC]

Good piece, referencing Lincoln's contemporary critics, and clarifying his status as a pragmatic moderate.

https://medium.com/frame-of-reference/abraham-lincoln-was-president-he-was-moderate-99991d2fc15f

So Lincoln pragmatically and moderately ordered the mowing down and plowing in of whole fields of rebels for year after year ongoing until they agreed to set aside their arms and rejoin the Union.

Jan 6 was our Sumpter. Bannon and Prince and Flynn are competing for the role of Stonewall Jackson. I am waiting for the moderate and pragmatic action now comprehensive, punitive, and spectacular enough to forstall the moderate and pragmatic exchange of lead, bombs, and drones in towns across the country that the right wing seditionist yahoo dirtbags of our day are steadily dragging us toward.

What Lincoln did not have was a DHS, FBI, Patriot Act, or RICO laws.

If Jeff Davis and friends were all busy on different chain gangs, does the south even manage to succeed? In authoritarian structures, like hives and nests, you can do immense structural damage by removing all the potential queens.

That is the current moderate pragmatic approach. Just ask Liz Cheney.

Get help.

Wake up.

[Holly Martins]

Bowdens attorney Steven Mitby said the doctor has treated more than 2,000 patients with Covid 19 at her private practice and that none of them have ended up in the hospital.
Her early treatment methods work and are saving lives, he added.
Dr. Bowden has the utmost respect for Houston Methodist and is proud of the work she has done along with her colleagues at Houston Methodist.
Bowdens Twitter account shows a series of tweets praising the anti parasitic drug ivermectin. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration have cautioned people against using the drug to treat Covid 19, CNN has reported.


https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/13/us/houston-doctor-suspended-covid-19/index.html

Having her ATTORNEY speak to her medical track record is just not especially convincing, Kid. We've gone down this road with you before.

Where is the independent corroboration of this amazing unmatched in the country track record?!

I would think the attorney's statement would be easily refuted if incorrect

How, if she is the only one with the medical records? The hospitals can't say, "Wait! We had one of her patients!"

There is NO evidence available, Kid. Just hearsay. Unsubstantiated claims.

In science,  when results are not reproducible,  that IS a refutation.   That is how Schiaparelli canals on Mars were rejected.  That is how Fleishman and Pons cold fusion in a jar was rejected.