Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[josh]

After Hutchinson's testimony, Sarah Matthews, who served as deputy press secretary in the Trump White House until resigning shortly after the January 6 attack, tweeted that "anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson's role or her access in the West Wing either doesn't understand how the Trump (White House) worked or is attempting to discredit her because they're scared of how damning this testimony is."

Role?

Access?

Right hand to the Chief of Staff for the President of the USA.

Schedule wrangler, door keeper and the grease that keeps the gears turning.

If it happens in and around the Oval she knows.

Yes, I understand.   She HEARS things

heh

No.

She knows.

You are harping on one instance where she clearly says SHE WAS TOLD about the instance by DCoS who was the actual witness.

Why is that fucking even a THING in a hearing?  That someone heard something.

Because it is not a trial and there is no hearsay exclusion. The only issue is relevance; well along with things like  the credibility and opportunity to observe for the witness. It is used all the time in non-trial situations.

Except in most grand jury proceedings the one sided testimony is secret.
In this case anything said that is politically damaging to the GOP is not.

This is a Congressional Hearing.

Not a trial nor grand jury.

Yes

Yet their end game is an indictment and a conviction.

If Liz had only stopped at "we just dont want him to run again" she would have been a proud American to be somewhat revered.

Alas...no.  The dark side has got her.

You had no complaints during the bogus Benghazi or Email hearings.

I am sure you had no complaints during the bogus Whitewater fishing expedition.

[josh]

https://nypost.com/2022/07/07/secret-service-chief-james-murray-leaving-to-take-snapchat-job/

Bailing on the agency when it is in trouble.

Just in time.

[Holly Martins]

https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/07/police-murder-clearance-rate/661500/

Of the six reasons given for failure to clear homicides, which one is the primary factor in the long decline in clearances?  Interview with crime analyst Jeff Asher.

[josh]

7 memorials in Highland Park for the deceased.

7 Christian "fish" symbols.

Added later were 7 carvings of Christian churches.

4 of the 7 dead were Jewish.

[LarryBnDC]

After Hutchinson's testimony, Sarah Matthews, who served as deputy press secretary in the Trump White House until resigning shortly after the January 6 attack, tweeted that "anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson's role or her access in the West Wing either doesn't understand how the Trump (White House) worked or is attempting to discredit her because they're scared of how damning this testimony is."

Role?

Access?

Right hand to the Chief of Staff for the President of the USA.

Schedule wrangler, door keeper and the grease that keeps the gears turning.

If it happens in and around the Oval she knows.

Yes, I understand.   She HEARS things

heh

No.

She knows.

You are harping on one instance where she clearly says SHE WAS TOLD about the instance by DCoS who was the actual witness.

Why is that fucking even a THING in a hearing?  That someone heard something.

Because it is not a trial and there is no hearsay exclusion. The only issue is relevance; well along with things like  the credibility and opportunity to observe for the witness. It is used all the time in non-trial situations.

Except in most grand jury proceedings the one sided testimony is secret.
In this case anything said that is politically damaging to the GOP is not.

This is a Congressional Hearing.

Not a trial nor grand jury.

Yes

Yet their end game is an indictment and a conviction.

If Liz had only stopped at "we just dont want him to run again" she would have been a proud American to be somewhat revered.

Alas...no.  The dark side has got her.

If the end game warrants indictment and conviction is that not justice for his crimes?

[LarryBnDC]

In the end it is Trump that triumphs as Liz's administration job is short lived and she has to move out of her state.

Not ending up in jail is the best he can hope for...

[josh]

For Ward:

[josh]

[kidcarter8]

After Hutchinson's testimony, Sarah Matthews, who served as deputy press secretary in the Trump White House until resigning shortly after the January 6 attack, tweeted that "anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson's role or her access in the West Wing either doesn't understand how the Trump (White House) worked or is attempting to discredit her because they're scared of how damning this testimony is."

Role?

Access?

Right hand to the Chief of Staff for the President of the USA.

Schedule wrangler, door keeper and the grease that keeps the gears turning.

If it happens in and around the Oval she knows.

Yes, I understand.   She HEARS things

heh

No.

She knows.

You are harping on one instance where she clearly says SHE WAS TOLD about the instance by DCoS who was the actual witness.

Why is that fucking even a THING in a hearing?  That someone heard something.

Because it is not a trial and there is no hearsay exclusion. The only issue is relevance; well along with things like  the credibility and opportunity to observe for the witness. It is used all the time in non-trial situations.

Except in most grand jury proceedings the one sided testimony is secret.
In this case anything said that is politically damaging to the GOP is not.

This is a Congressional Hearing.

Not a trial nor grand jury.

Yes

Yet their end game is an indictment and a conviction.

If Liz had only stopped at "we just dont want him to run again" she would have been a proud American to be somewhat revered.

Alas...no.  The dark side has got her.

If the end game warrants indictment and conviction is that not justice for his crimes?

Doesnt matter

You wont lay off if he is NOT indicted.  Your group will spout either way       

[kidcarter8]

Good luck

Should be an easy one fo Dems

[josh]

https://twitter.com/abughazalehkat/status/1544818389289508867

Bill Bennett recommends exorcism.

[josh]

After Hutchinson's testimony, Sarah Matthews, who served as deputy press secretary in the Trump White House until resigning shortly after the January 6 attack, tweeted that "anyone downplaying Cassidy Hutchinson's role or her access in the West Wing either doesn't understand how the Trump (White House) worked or is attempting to discredit her because they're scared of how damning this testimony is."

Role?

Access?

Right hand to the Chief of Staff for the President of the USA.

Schedule wrangler, door keeper and the grease that keeps the gears turning.

If it happens in and around the Oval she knows.

Yes, I understand.   She HEARS things

heh

No.

She knows.

You are harping on one instance where she clearly says SHE WAS TOLD about the instance by DCoS who was the actual witness.

Why is that fucking even a THING in a hearing?  That someone heard something.

Because it is not a trial and there is no hearsay exclusion. The only issue is relevance; well along with things like  the credibility and opportunity to observe for the witness. It is used all the time in non-trial situations.

Except in most grand jury proceedings the one sided testimony is secret.
In this case anything said that is politically damaging to the GOP is not.

This is a Congressional Hearing.

Not a trial nor grand jury.

Yes

Yet their end game is an indictment and a conviction.

If Liz had only stopped at "we just dont want him to run again" she would have been a proud American to be somewhat revered.

Alas...no.  The dark side has got her.

If the end game warrants indictment and conviction is that not justice for his crimes?

Doesnt matter

You wont lay off if he is NOT indicted.  Your group will spout either way       

Kind of like you and yours and HRC.

You won't lay off if he is indicted or if he is found guilty of anything.

[josh]

Good luck

Should be an easy one fo Dems

If the GOP voters cared about anything but Trumpism, you would be right. So we will see.

[josh]

[josh]

https://archive.ph/N0Oxb - NYT:

How Unlikely Is It That the Audits of Comey and McCabe Were a Coincidence? A Statistical Exploration.
The chances are minuscule. But minuscule is not zero.