Which they are you asserting are making statements they wish to be true?
The witnesses?
The committee members?
The authors of the June 29 updated article?
no
yes
no
The witnesses' accounts are what makes the claims you are denying true, not the Committee members.
Committee testifying to something does not make it so.
Nor even witnesses doing so.
However, what I am trying to pry from you is which of the witness statements are you claiming contradict what the Committee has said, because as far as I can tell their statements support the points being made, regardless of the Committee members' comments.
Doesnt matter.
Committee members shouldn testify
Andwe all know the "evidence" has been cherry picked - we see only what fits their narrative since there is no balance and thus no fairness to this committee
It matters.
and no matter what has not been shown, is what has been shown enough to support the claims?
There is no requirement in the hearings for
exculpatory evidence, or have you forgotten Benghazi or the email hearings or Whitewater?
The evidence that has been presented supports the positions taken by the Committee and that even you cannot pretend otherwise speaks volumes.
"Doesn't matter," indeed.
Poll
