Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[LarryBnDC]

democrats diss Herschel Walker mainly because he is a black republican.
The same standard for dissing  Clarence Thomas

There is quite a bit of difference between the two men in achievements but the primal reason for democrats to abhor both has nothing to do with reason.

Democrats cannot look past the color of their skin.

Nah.

Base of the Democratic Party is anchored by Black people and Thomas and walker are toxic for their hypocrisy.

All skinfolk are not kinfolk.

Black man voting Republican is  like a chicken voting for Col. Sanders!

Father of former rising star Republican J.C.Watts

[Espnthree]

The best moment of the week


@RashidaTlaib challenges bank CEOs to agree to stop funding fossil fuels, is rejected by every single one

Jamie Dimon: "That would be the road to Hell for America"

[LarryBnDC]

The best moment of the week


@RashidaTlaib challenges bank CEOs to agree to stop funding fossil fuels, is rejected by every single one

Jamie Dimon: "That would be the road to Hell for America"

How does that corporate boot taste?

[Holly Martins]

Exhibit A

R-Cancun - nice touch.

[LarryBnDC]

Exhibit A

R-Cancun - nice touch.

Ted Cruz bragging about a project

https://www.cruz.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sen-cruz-praised-for-ports-to-plains-legislative-victory-in-big-spring-texas

That he voted against...

https://www.newsweek.com/ted-cruz-trolled-white-house-applauding-bill-he-didnt-support-1745149

[Hairy Lime]

democrats diss Herschel Walker mainly because he is a black republican.
The same standard for dissing  Clarence Thomas

There is quite a bit of difference between the two men in achievements but the primal reason for democrats to abhor both has nothing to do with reason.

Democrats cannot look past the color of their skin.

The only reason to think that is if you are a racist who think that race is the only thing black and democratic voters care.about and that for black candidates policy position moral,.ethical and intellectual fitness for.office are irrelevant.  Or in your case, because.

If you think Walkers race is the main reason for opposing him the person who cannot see beyond the color of his skin is you.

[Holly Martins]

He doesn't think, he commits talking points to memory.

And there's no talking point that unleashes squirts of dopamine in the brain quite like the liberal racism one. 

I would be happy to discuss liberal racism with someone who also owns up to the racism of their party.  But that would require intellectual honesty and a knowledge of history.

[Espnthree]

democrats diss Herschel Walker mainly because he is a black republican.
The same standard for dissing  Clarence Thomas

There is quite a bit of difference between the two men in achievements but the primal reason for democrats to abhor both has nothing to do with reason.

Democrats cannot look past the color of their skin.

The only reason to think that is if you are a racist who think that race is the only thing black and democratic voters care.about and that for black candidates policy position moral,.ethical and intellectual fitness for.office are irrelevant.  Or in your case, because.

If you think Walkers race is the main reason for opposing him the person who cannot see beyond the color of his skin is you.

You never disappoint.

[kidcarter8]

If you think Walkers race is the main reason for opposing him the person who cannot see beyond the color of his skin is you.


So very true

But the problem really lies when a man is not accepted solely due to his PARTY.  This may not describe how you live, but does for so many on this forum.

[Espnthree]

He doesn't think, he commits talking points to memory.

And there's no talking point that unleashes squirts of dopamine in the brain quite like the liberal racism one. 

I would be happy to discuss liberal racism with someone who also owns up to the racism of their party.  But that would require intellectual honesty and a knowledge of history.

Which disqualifies you and most leftists, at least the ones on here.  Anyone on the right is quickly dismissed as deplorable, a racist, a fascist, and any other insulting term, Du jour.

When your hypocritical attitude is pointed out you then you get even more insulting.

Maybe a November red wave will wake you up.

[Hairy Lime]

He doesn't think, he commits talking points to memory.

And there's no talking point that unleashes squirts of dopamine in the brain quite like the liberal racism one. 

I would be happy to discuss liberal racism with someone who also owns up to the racism of their party.  But that would require intellectual honesty and a knowledge of history.

Which disqualifies you and most leftists, at least the ones on here.  Anyone on the right is quickly dismissed as deplorable, a racist, a fascist, and any other insulting term, Du jour.

Partisan cocksucker.

[Holly Martins]

Warddickesp:

You mistake me for someone else.  I don't dismiss anyone on the Right as racist.  Some are, some aren't, some are in a gray area where bias is largely unconscious.  And that's true for people all across any political spectrum.  I have no doubt there have been Left-wing policies, well-intentioned, that reflected bias n the form of "this is the help they need."  Same goes for the Right. 

That said, your ASSUMPTIONS about what drives criticism of Walker reflect bias about partisanship and a narrow focus on race.  People criticize Walker because he tells a lot of lies and spouts ignorant drivel.  As others points out, that's not really a disqualification for the US Congress, but it should make us question competence to lead.

[Espnthree]

He doesn't think, he commits talking points to memory.

And there's no talking point that unleashes squirts of dopamine in the brain quite like the liberal racism one. 

I would be happy to discuss liberal racism with someone who also owns up to the racism of their party.  But that would require intellectual honesty and a knowledge of history.

Which disqualifies you and most leftists, at least the ones on here.  Anyone on the right is quickly dismissed as deplorable, a racist, a fascist, and any other insulting term, Du jour.

Partisan cocksucker.

Case in point

[Espnthree]

Warddickesp:

You mistake me for someone else.  I don't dismiss anyone on the Right as racist.  Some are, some aren't, some are in a gray area where bias is largely unconscious.  And that's true for people all across any political spectrum.  I have no doubt there have been Left-wing policies, well-intentioned, that reflected bias n the form of "this is the help they need."  Same goes for the Right. 

How condescending of you in light of how you address your reply.

[Hairy Lime]

He doesn't think, he commits talking points to memory.

And there's no talking point that unleashes squirts of dopamine in the brain quite like the liberal racism one. 

I would be happy to discuss liberal racism with someone who also owns up to the racism of their party.  But that would require intellectual honesty and a knowledge of history.

Which disqualifies you and most leftists, at least the ones on here.  Anyone on the right is quickly dismissed as deplorable, a racist, a fascist, and any other insulting term, Du jour.

Partisan cocksucker.

Case in point

Indeed. Some of us have long memories of your past names, when partisan cocksuckwr was how you addressed members here who disagree with you.