Weekend lowlights from the Biden Administration of Horrors
Kamala Harris Says US Must
Reduce Population to fight Climate Change
Huh,? Is she the bastard daughter of discredited Population Bomb author Paul Ehrlich who has been laughed out of credibility for more thann50 years.
Well, relax. The White House rushed forward to summon help for Clean Up In the Veep Room
Again. (She meant to say pollution)
She should have said both. Four billion is far more sustainable than eight billion. Smaller families would get us there, and fewer would die in famines that coming ecological disruptions will produce. Ehrlich was wrong about the timeline (there were famines but not on the scale he predicted), but his ideas about sustainable population have been developed by others and his basic point about population biology validated. As E.F. Schumacher said, unlimited growth is the philosophy of a cancer cell.
Erhlich was simply debunked. And 8 billion is nowhere close to what earth can sustain.
See how easy that is ?
Easy if you don't study population biology or ecology and are unencumbered by the process of thought.
Sustainable is a concept that encompasses quality of life, not just survival at subsistence level. We are at eight billion, arable land is shrinking, aquifers are emptying, nearly a billion live on the edge of hunger or are undernourished, 1.7 billion is looking at catastrophic heat waves and droughts while lacking the wherewithal to move out of those areas, and many more depend on delicate global supply chains easily disrupted by war, natural disasters, pandemics, and economic turbulence.
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/