Ah yes, the simplistic reasoning of WSL columnists, the notion that wildfires can only have a single cause. Power lines can be a proximate cause, but that doesn't mean a cooler wetter woodland with lower wind speeds would catch fire as easily. The ability to discern multiple causation is one that the Ohio twit lacks. So he's an easy mark for partisan hacks.
Or you could read the lawsuit. BTW, What is a WSL?
Wall Street Liars would be my guess. And since you did not read the lawsuit, why should he?
Yes, fires have sparks. Human cause, lightning, magpies. Unless and until we burn off so much atmosphere that the ozone acts as a giant magnifying glass, there will always be a triggering event. What climate change does is make.those triggering events more likely to start a fire and more likely to make the fires worse. Which is the point oil makes that you so assiduously avoid. Because, since it is not addressed in the article you plagiarized you are incapable of addressing yourself.