Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[facilitatorn]

Trump will be entering the Big House. The only way he will ever see the White House again is on TV.

[LarryB!]

Well, so much for one of my favored replacements for Biden:

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/06/27/kinky-friedman-dies-texas-governor-race-musician/

So long to the Kinkster! One of my fave denizens of 1980s Greenwhich Vilage! He and his boys had a regular Sunday night gig at the Lone Star Cafe on 5th Ave (great chili!)and real pretty waitresses!

Well, a redneck nerd in a bowling shirt
Was a-guzzling Lone Star beer
Talking religion and-uh politics for all the world to hear
They oughta send you back to Russia, boy
Or New York City, One
You just want to doodle a Christian girl
And you killed God's only son.

No, they aint makin Jews like Jesus anymore
They dont turn the other cheek the way they done before
He started in to shoutin and a-spittin on the floor
Lord, they ain't makin Jews like Jesus anymore.

[LarryB!]

For the love of God, Buddha, Mohammed, Brahma and democracy, Joe, please step down at the August convention and endorse someone else...Harris, Whitmer, Newsom, Beshear, Booker, Klobuchar, anyone who can rally voters and does not have vacant moments.

Kind of late, by about two years, to start thinking about replacing Joe.
Biden has over 3,000 convention delegates and the nomination in the bag if  decides to stay in the race. Losing an election is a better exit strategy then throwing in the towel. That leaves Harris who is the only person eligible to the Biden/Harris campaign funds, which is a very big war chest. Anyone else would have to start from scratch.
What is clearly evident is that the LAWFARE strategy of the party poobahs was big mistake. Trump moved ahead in the polls and fundraising despite being convicted. Now with Biden collapsing Trump could walk right through an unlocked front door of the WHITE HOUSE.

I did not have sex with a pornstar!

Is gonna make a great campaign slogan.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

[Hairy Lime]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

[LarryB!]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection Agency. So Neil Goresuch finally gets revenge for his mom.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

No. Layers of COURT reviews.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection .

That is a good thing in the case of the EPA.

[Hairy Lime]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

As are bureaucrats. And those who review them are eventually answerable to the voters. Unlike, in the Federal system, judges.

[LarryB!]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

No. Layers of COURT reviews.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection .

That is a good thing in the case of the EPA.

Yeah, fuck those kids in Louisiana Cance Alley.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

No. Layers of COURT reviews.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection .

That is a good thing in the case of the EPA.

Yeah, fuck those kids in Louisiana Cance Alley.

What is the connection?

[Hairy Lime]

And the SCOTUS once again reinforces the majestic equality of the law in forbidding the rich and the poor alike from sleeping under bridges.

[LarryB!]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

No. Layers of COURT reviews.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection .

That is a good thing in the case of the EPA.

Yeah, fuck those kids in Louisiana Cance Alley.

What is the connection?

I am not gonna dignify that bullshit with a response. Exercise some fucking logic.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

Yeah, layers of review by conservative and corporate groups including the billionaire Charles Koch.

No. Layers of COURT reviews.

In ending the deference, the conservative-majority court has slashed and severely weakened the powers of agencies including the Environmental Protection .

That is a good thing in the case of the EPA.

Yeah, fuck those kids in Louisiana Cance Alley.

What is the connection?

I am not gonna dignify that bullshit with a response. Exercise some fucking logic.

The chevron decision has no bearing on Cancer Alley.

[jmmengel]

And stare decisis is a meaningless doctrine if it only applies to decisions you agree with.

Stare Decisis does not equate to eternal life.

I prefer a government that is accountable to elected representatives, not to bureaucrats     Via the patronage merry go round.

Goodbye clean water and air!

Actually, the decision puts regulations in the hands of unelected judges.

Who are subject to layers of review.

As are bureaucrats.

Who are not