Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[LarryB!]

Harris has been on a ballot.  And won as potential president  so she was accepted and vetted democratically.

You cannot be serious.

Article II, sec.1, clause 6 (further clarified by the 25th A).  See the rest of my post which you felt it necessary to trim away.

I was right.

Tisnt.

And you yourself made the point that this years primary was largely a formality, a ceremonial rite of recognition.  So that would undermine your other argument that the primary is a BFD and cannot ever have its winner assign someone else as replacement.   
4
Especially when that replacement is ALREADY VETTED and already on the ticket. 

Harris was vetted in 2020 and got no( as in ZERO) delegates
This year she got none, only delegates she recruited after Biden was cast aside.
And no subsequent vetting.

Harris dropped out in 2019 before the Iowa caucuses so no one had a chance to vote on her. This year she was on the INCUMBENT ticket and the president stepped down and endorsed her to step up.
As far as Vetting,

Bruh, she has been on the World Stage for three and a half years!

It's pretty clear that Red is just trolling.  The guy he voted for last time (do I need to add "and this time too!!!"?) actually tried to overturn the results of the election and Red didn't say a word.  I mean Red's a hypocrite and all that, but even he's not that much of one.

[LarryB!]

I was not surprised at all when Biden selected Harris as VP


From December 2019

the Harris campaign was no dime-store operation, regardless postmortem punditry. It was big and heavily invested and organized in Iowa and South Carolina, and we are left to wonder what might have happened if she had made it to a vote.

Kamala Harris remains a force to be reckoned within the Democratic Party because, like it or not, she looks like the partys base. Although she will not be president in 2020, look to hear from her again before the election.


https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2019/12/08/attacks-doomed-kamala-harris-but-youd-be-wise-to-remember-the-name/

[jmmengel]

Harris has already obtained a majority of delegates in the "We do not trust Ohio Republicans to keep their word" pre-convention nominating canvas. Because, you see, the delegates elected to the convention were able to vote on their preferred candidate once the candidate they were pledged to voluntary withdrew and released them. Just like Haley and DeSantis delegates could. That is a representative democracy in action.

LOL!
Man, you are a hoot!

[Yankguy1]

This is easily resolvable Red.  You continue with your vote for Trump and let the Democratic Party handle all the legal proceedings no doubt will come its way as a result of its chicanery.

[Hairy Lime]

Harris has already obtained a majority of delegates in the "We do not trust Ohio Republicans to keep their word" pre-convention nominating canvas. Because, you see, the delegates elected to the convention were able to vote on their preferred candidate once the candidate they were pledged to voluntary withdrew and released them. Just like Haley and DeSantis delegates could. That is a representative democracy in action.

LOL!
Man, you are a hoot!

As in, proverbally wise as an owl.

[jmmengel]

This is easily resolvable Red.  You continue with your vote for Trump and let the Democratic Party handle all the legal proceedings no doubt will come its way as a result of its chicanery.

Unlike you I have a moral compass.  You do not even know what the debate is
about.

[Yankguy1]

You? Moral?  Now I know you're trolling.

Your idea of morality is whoever has one more point on the scoreboard.

[jmmengel]

You? Moral?  Now I know you're trolling.

Your idea of morality is whoever has one more point on the scoreboard.

As long as they got there by the rules.

[Yankguy1]

You're hysterical.

[jmmengel]

You're hysterical.

Well I do find your postings lead to hysterical moments of laughter.

Laughter is good.

But  hysteria is what affects the democrats who argue that to save democracy they must destroy parts of it.
I do not find much humor in that.

[facilitatorn]

You're hysterical.

Why has the weirdo gone into hysterics?

Scoreboard, of course

http://www.mediaite.com/election-2024/just-in-notoriously-pro-trump-pollster-scott-rasmussen-has-kamala-harris-up-5-points/amp/

Having a good healthy laugh at Red, his candidate and their sick stinky fascist movement spiraling down the drain.

[Yankguy1]

You're hysterical.

Well I do find your postings lead to hysterical moments of laughter.

Laughter is good.

But  hysteria is what affects the democrats who argue that to save democracy they must destroy parts of it.
I do not find much humor in that.

I trust your continued support of the man and the party who literally tried to overturn an election causes great gales of laughter for you as well.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.huffpost.com/entry/anti-trump-republicans-swing-state-ad_n_66ac66e2e4b037c1f37ea144

[jmmengel]

You're hysterical.

Well I do find your postings lead to hysterical moments of laughter.

Laughter is good.

But  hysteria is what affects the democrats who argue that to save democracy they must destroy parts of it.
I do not find much humor in that.

I trust your continued support of the man and the party who literally tried to overturn an election causes great gales of laughter for you as well.

That is an entirely different issue.
One that been ajudicated(still more to come) guilty parties have been sent to jail, and will be a 2024  issue for many, including me.

[Yankguy1]

So you continue to support a party that supports adjudicated criminals. Yet I have no moral compass.