probably Pedro
then Koufax
Pedro because of his relative longevity and excellence
YMMV
See? You couldn't do it. You had to go look up WHO the stats were from. And not sure how "relative longevity" comes from Pedro?
HEH
Did what?
forget what I knew?
I didn't need to look up stats.
When you mention Kaat a couple of days ago I looked at his stats, so the 3 pitchers you decided to comp were known.
Its not my fault you suck at presenting a persuasive argument.
I didn't make an argument. I posed a question to the group.
Most would understand the difference between an argument and a question.
But you? Maybe not.
And I answered your question
Pedro, Koufax and then Kaat.
Utley you've been making an argument for Moyer for years.
and have persuaded no one.
a few days ago you promoted his artistry and charitable works and outstanding character as reasons to promote his HoF candidacy.
It was not a very strong argument for his case.
And you comped him to Kaat.
Katt as posted was a far better pitcher and a case can be made for him in the HoF.
I took your 1,2,3 comp as a rhetorical device to further your beliefs.
An ulterior motive as it were.
Which is fine.
But I answered your question.
Kaat was a pretty good pitcher, maybe a HoF pitcer, but he was not remotely as talented as Pedro or Koufax. He's not in the same discussion as those guys.
YMMV
And fwiw, in a small community that is populated mostly by reasonably knowledgable baseball fans many of whom watched baseball in the 60s, those stats were suffficent to ID Pedro and Koufax, two of the greatest pitchers ever.
again, YMMV