Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

On time

1 (33.3%)

Late, but on or before April 15th

0 (0%)

April 16th through April 30th

0 (0%)

May 1st through May 15th

2 (66.7%)

May 16th through May 31st

0 (0%)

Jun1st through June 15th

0 (0%)

June 16th through June 30th

0 (0%)

After June 30th

0 (0%)

No Season

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 3

Voting closed: February 13, 2022, 10:41:25 PM

[bankshot1]

regular season franchise wins

[kiidcarter8]

1912 team still arguably better

That Heinie Wagner was a hell of a ballplayer

[bankshot1]

Never saw the '12 team play, so I'll defer to you.

The quest for 107 postponed until tomorrow.

[kiiidcarter8]

Who in history?

30 2b
35 hr
100 runs
100 rbi
125 bb

for a season.

[josh]

Who in history?

30 2b
35 hr
100 runs
100 rbi
125 bb

for a season.

36 2b
34 hr
107 runs
103 rbi
127 bb
39 sb

for a season.

[kiidcarter8]

Sorry - you are one HR short 

[josh]

Sorry - you are one HR short 

And 11 more runs produced. But I chose a simpler year.

The best thing about your example was the even 100 runs and ribbies.

[Hamilton Samuels]

Even your insults are stupid.

No insult. He was just pointing out what a sharp guy you are.

[Hamilton Samuels]

Sox don't make the World Series. Book it.

[bankshot1]

IIRC my preseason picks for the series was Astros-(Nats or LADs-don't remember which), with Astros repeating.

Pretty sure I had
AL div winners
Sox
Tribe
Astros

WC-Yankees (don't remember 2nd team, maybe Seattle)

NL

Nats
Cubs
LADs

WC-don't remember


Still think Astros should be favored.

[kiidcarter8]

Sorry - you are one HR short 

And 11 more runs produced. But I chose a simpler year.

The best thing about your example was the even 100 runs and ribbies.

All numbers should of course have a + after them.

[josh]

Sorry - you are one HR short 

And 11 more runs produced. But I chose a simpler year.

The best thing about your example was the even 100 runs and ribbies.

All numbers should of course have a + after them.

It's an argument.

For my numbers today, I intentionally chose ones less likely to be subject to *, if not +.

[whiskeypriest]

IIRC my preseason picks for the series was Astros-(Nats or LADs-don't remember which), with Astros repeating.

Pretty sure I had
AL div winners
Sox
Tribe
Astros

WC-Yankees (don't remember 2nd team, maybe Seattle)

NL

Nats
Cubs
LADs

WC-don't remember


Still think Astros should be favored.

I have all my picks saved somewhere. I will repost them, though it may take me until the end of October to find them. I expect uncanny accuracy.

[whiskeypriest]

If my math is correct, if Boston wins out and Baltimore loses out, Baltimore will set a Modern Era record by finishing 66 games back, beating the 1909 Boston Doves by half a game, and the AL record 1939 St. Louis Browns 64.5 by 1.5 games. The playoff era record - Detroit 2003, a measly 47 GB? Shattered.

The all time record, set by the egregious Cleveland Spiders in 1899 - 84 GB - is out of reach.  Better luck next year, Orioles!

Almost makes me want to root for the Red Sox for the rest of the year.

[kiidcarter8]

Preseason picks are cool, if you want to go back (we all had WAS, CHI, LA - I am sure)

But picks this coming Monday - after we have the teams all set - would be a nice contest (number of games per series as a bonus)

I will post mine if I remember

(FTR, I believe I had a HOU repeat - over Cubs - but could have been over Nats)

- Still mulling a +240 Cubs bet for the NL title.  Worried about their bullpen.  Staying way away in the AL. thoug best looking $$ would be CLE