Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[jmmengel]

So, you're a Maga guy.  Doesn't it feel good to admit it?

I am a MAGA guy? You are delusional.

Of course you are. Every post of yours screams it. Liar.

you can not post one that reflects that.

[jmmengel]

I'm confident that "we" just constitutes you. 

P.S.  Your use of the royal we makes you look, if possible, like more of a jerk.

And the comparison of the Constitutional issues in the two cases is based on what?
We get your inability to respond.

To repeat.
Your remarkably convenient, flexible and intellectually dishonest definition of "close call."
We.get your refusal to answer.

Refusal to point out the obvious? 6-3 three is not a close call

[jmmengel]

 Constitutional issues

 What were the constitutional issues in Snyder?  They were interpreting a statute in US Code 18, but with reference to what part of the Constitution?

Article One( corrected)

[Hairy Lime]

I'm confident that "we" just constitutes you. 

P.S.  Your use of the royal we makes you look, if possible, like more of a jerk.

And the comparison of the Constitutional issues in the two cases is based on what?
We get your inability to respond.

To repeat.
Your remarkably convenient, flexible and intellectually dishonest definition of "close call."
We.get your refusal to answer.

Refusal to point out the obvious? 6-3 three is not a close call

Neither is 7 - 2.

[jmmengel]

I'm confident that "we" just constitutes you. 

P.S.  Your use of the royal we makes you look, if possible, like more of a jerk.

And the comparison of the Constitutional issues in the two cases is based on what?
We get your inability to respond.

To repeat.
Your remarkably convenient, flexible and intellectually dishonest definition of "close call."
We.get your refusal to answer.

Refusal to point out the obvious? 6-3 three is not a close call

Neither is 7 - 2.

Never said it was not. It is, though, irrelevant to compare with this 6-3.

[Hairy Lime]

 Constitutional issues

 What were the constitutional issues in Snyder?  They were interpreting a statute in US Code 18, but with reference to what part of the Constitution?

Article Two

You are an idiot.

[facilitatorn]

Your references to the court deciding cases based on politics is ridiculous.

No wonder you're voting Trump.  You identify with his functional illiteracy.

I am not voting for Trump.  Never have.

Here's an example of a "we" actually working: We don't believe you.

It is a large and well populated we in this case.

[Hairy Lime]

So, you're a Maga guy.  Doesn't it feel good to admit it?

I am a MAGA guy? You are delusional.

Of course you are. Every post of yours screams it. Liar.

you can not post one that reflects that.

Yes i can but I will not. It would serve no useful purpose. Everyone here knows you are pro Trump but for some reason you do not want to admit it. You will just deny the obvious.

[jmmengel]

 Constitutional issues

 What were the constitutional issues in Snyder?  They were interpreting a statute in US Code 18, but with reference to what part of the Constitution?

Article Two

You are an idiot.

Right on Cue.

[Hairy Lime]

 Constitutional issues

 What were the constitutional issues in Snyder?  They were interpreting a statute in US Code 18, but with reference to what part of the Constitution?

Article Two

You are an idiot.

Right on Cue.

Yes, I denounce your idiocy on cue. Idiot.

[jmmengel]

So, you're a Maga guy.  Doesn't it feel good to admit it?

I am a MAGA guy? You are delusional.

Of course you are. Every post of yours screams it.

Ah.  Screams so loud you can not find one.

[Hairy Lime]

So, you're a Maga guy.  Doesn't it feel good to admit it?

I am a MAGA guy? You are delusional.

Of course you are. Every post of yours screams it.

Ah.  Screams so loud you can not find one.

No fish for you!

[jmmengel]

So, you're a Maga guy.  Doesn't it feel good to admit it?

I am a MAGA guy? You are delusional.

Of course you are. Every post of yours screams it.

Ah.  Screams so loud you can not find one.

No fish for you!

still looking?

[Oil Filter]

 Constitutional issues

 What were the constitutional issues in Snyder?  They were interpreting a statute in US Code 18, but with reference to what part of the Constitution?

Article Two

Article II?  Presidential powers?  Sorry, I don't see the connection to Snyder v US.  It is comforting to have a constitutional scholar who can explain that for us!

[bambu.]

More than a few people believe that it was the Blair Labour govt that ruined Britain...with massive immigration etc.