Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[facilitatorn]

I like the concept. Can you post a link to your site?

[Hairy Lime]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

That italicization says everything.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

Did you read the articles? The people who run the DBC disagree with you. But then they know what they are talking about and study and care for saguaroes and other desert plants every day of their lives. Who needs "pointy headed experts" when you have people like an op ed writer from Faux News or the WSJ or bambu's number two for brains number one radio host.

[Espnthree]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

That italicization says everything.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

Did you read the articles? The people who run the DBC disagree with you. But then they know what they are talking about and study and care for saguaroes and other desert plants every day of their lives. Who needs "pointy headed experts" when you have people like an op ed writer from Faux News or the WSJ or bambu's number two for brains number one radio host.

Yes I read them or I would not have posted them.
I am sorry you do not understand them.

[Hairy Lime]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

That italicization says everything.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

Did you read the articles? The people who run the DBC disagree with you. But then they know what they are talking about and study and care for saguaroes and other desert plants every day of their lives. Who needs "pointy headed experts" when you have people like an op ed writer from Faux News or the WSJ or bambu's number two for brains number one radio host.

Yes I read them or I would not have posted them.
I am sorry you do not understand them.

My apologies. I meant article, referring to oil's link, not articles, which would appear to refer to yours. Though the context should have been clear, my phrasing was not.

[facilitatorn]

I like the concept. Can you post a link to your site?

FAC,  cartoons posted on website

It is dope seeing them all one after the other in series.

The mechanics of your site stop me from easily reaching the image link through my phone so the easy way to add an image does not work for images posted there. Edit functions in my interface only reach the top frame.

It looks like Jesus will be voting Biden again due to the great job he is doing and the extra shitty quality of the alternatives.

[Espnthree]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

That italicization says everything.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

Did you read the articles? The people who run the DBC disagree with you. But then they know what they are talking about and study and care for saguaroes and other desert plants every day of their lives. Who needs "pointy headed experts" when you have people like an op ed writer from Faux News or the WSJ or bambu's number two for brains number one radio host.

Yes I read them or I would not have posted them.
I am sorry you do not understand them.

My apologies. I meant article, referring to oil's link, not articles, which would appear to refer to yours. Though the context should have been clear, my phrasing was not.

The original article is irrelevant since Climate Change has existed for billions of years and life on earth has never been better. No one denies human existence is part of the cause but our adaptation to change has been and will be the  driving force to an even bette life.
The idea we have to scrap our existing energy sources and replace them with yet unproven methods that cannot handle the challenges posed by 7 billion souls over 200 countries is ridiculous.

The old adage Everybody talks about but no one does a thing about THE WEATHER
has been proved proven false zillions of times.

[facilitatorn]

Adaptations will save us so it is ridiculous to think we have to adapt.

Red and the right wing have trickled down to the point where they do not function at all above the neck.  It is an adaptation of a sort to a world that has passed them by.

[Oilcandide]

The idea we have to scrap our existing energy sources and replace them with yet unproven methods

LIAR

1887 - the year James Blyth proved the concept of an electricity generating wond turbine, in Scotland.

And wind power, with mechanical gearing, was first developed in Persia, in the 9th century.  Holland followed with upgrades in the 12th century and thereafter.

What is unproven is that you have the slightest grasp of low carbon power technologies or ancillary storage technologies. 

Reading only right-wing propaganda has been demonstrated to kill neurons at the same pace as huffing spray paint.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/11/magazine/greta-gerwig-barbie.html?unlocked_article_code=A8xLUraGXXZP7bNc--csoHFQCXQLItsOCOLIHJnC2H4S5FjGcQ7PWkotPD-elZDGHfB3M1AcmP7hwIAkJpEkiDNcqlt0FcxPFeOdhKgd5mNU1YDM_8tlh9E27av6ceV56_1GgNfXQBEpa2VKKSZV7cQPtpHN-uibsAwOGIuaxDe0ycZi3Z_RgfoEe6NXTNDUiPvvEjAOdyZ6qsyboqPPM1bvsD5wTLEhscgwdDydpNX-OUAWWd9HpmOLhAhA5tHmI_urFFbRAJaRN-WI1QF1L2vONNkht_4YtLLaCSdD789mV4CWkXt1PrKgGUoiVgLxoI0AxatGY_TCFcritvA&smid=url-share

 

[facilitatorn]

The idea we have to scrap our existing energy sources and replace them with yet unproven methods

LIAR

1887 - the year James Blyth proved the concept of an electricity generating wond turbine, in Scotland.

And wind power, with mechanical gearing, was first developed in Persia, in the 9th century.  Holland followed with upgrades in the 12th century and thereafter.

What is unproven is that you have the slightest grasp of low carbon power technologies or ancillary storage technologies. 

Reading only right-wing propaganda has been demonstrated to kill neurons at the same pace as huffing spray paint.

I like this tactic of drowning red in a whole thought. It is an approach that cuts right through the many layers of misconceptions in which the nasty little prick likes to hide.

[LarryB!]

I like the concept. Can you post a link to your site?

gradycartoons.com

[LarryB!]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

That italicization says everything.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

Did you read the articles? The people who run the DBC disagree with you. But then they know what they are talking about and study and care for saguaroes and other desert plants every day of their lives. Who needs "pointy headed experts" when you have people like an op ed writer from Faux News or the WSJ or bambu's number two for brains number one radio host.

Yes I read them or I would not have posted them.
I am sorry you do not understand them.

My apologies. I meant article, referring to oil's link, not articles, which would appear to refer to yours. Though the context should have been clear, my phrasing was not.

The original article is irrelevant since Climate Change has existed for billions of years and life on earth has never been better. No one denies human existence is part of the cause but our adaptation to change has been and will be the  driving force to an even bette life.
The idea we have to scrap our existing energy sources and replace them with yet unproven methods that cannot handle the challenges posed by 7 billion souls over 200 countries is ridiculous.

The old adage Everybody talks about but no one does a thing about THE WEATHER
has been proved proven false zillions of times.

Amazing how these wingers are so determinedly suicidal when it comes to Covid and Climate Change but why do they insist on taking the rest of us with them?

Fucking world is on fire and these assholes are talking about WEATHER.

[facilitatorn]

I like the concept. Can you post a link to your site?

FAC,  cartoons posted on website

It is dope seeing them all one after the other in series.

The mechanics of your site stop me from easily reaching the image link through my phone so the easy way to add an image does not work for images posted there. Edit functions in my interface only reach the top frame.

It looks like Jesus will be voting Biden again due to the great job he is doing and the extra shitty quality of the alternatives.

Thanks FAC,  the slide show looks good on LTs and Tablets.
Hopefully, the mod returns and fixes the problem.
Th error messages say too much time elapsed before posting, which is ridiculous
or the file is too big, which I know is not the case.
Quotes, apostrophes, and now attachments
I suspect the site will crash again soon and Be down until the writers strike is over!
👌👍✌️👏🙏😉

If you add a static gallery format you will be able to display those images here simply through the simple img tag. You may want to use smaller watermarked versions to do it.

Waiting for the mod may be as futile as waiting for Red, Kiid, Bambi or Luee to grow up and become men.

She helps those who help themselves without blithely or intentionally making a fucking mess of it.

[facilitatorn]

Amazing how these wingers are so determinedly suicidal when it comes to Covid and Climate Change but why do they insist on taking the rest of us with them?

Fucking world is on fire and these assholes are talking about WEATHER.

If it all burns down they will stop being reminded how shittily they are doing compared to everyone with a lick of sense at everything despite their having been born on third base.

Obtuseness is their suicide bomb. Their self hatred is an accelerant in the mix.

[LarryB!]

The findings show that consensus has increased across the board. The findings also reaffirm that consensus increases with the level of expertise -  the more you know about climate science, the more likely you are to understand that humans are responsible for climate change. Near 100 percent of scientists in our most expert group who identify as climatologists and actively publish in the peer-reviewed literature are in complete agreement that climate change is real and caused by humans, says Peter Doran.   

https://phys.org/news/2021-10-scientific-agreement-anthropogenic-nature-climate.html

(no paywall)

Meanwhile back in the real world which includes real people not pointy headed experts

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-k-parliamentary-election-climate-policy-sadiq-khan-boris-johnson-5c5c0c9e


https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/not-climate-change-causing-heat-waves-this-summer-explain

https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-will-never-run-out-of-resources-earth-ocean-tech-knowledge-engineering-e65f88c7

Oh, and by the way, Cacti in the Arizona desert can survive 96 minimum temps, just not grow as fast.
This ain t their first dance with the heat.

About the cacti

https://www.voanews.com/a/saguaro-cacti-collapsing-in-arizona-extreme-heat-scientist-says/7202127.html


Weather Abnormalities

But some events were so abnormal that they sent a wave of consternation through the scientific community. Antarctic sea ice is at a historically low level for this time of year, according to federal data. Sea surface temperatures across the North Atlantic have been off the charts Europes Copernicus Climate Change Service reported, noting that the figures set records for this time of year by a very large marginWater temperatures off the coast of South Florida rose to unfathomable levels in recent days, leading scientists to fear for the fate of the only living coral barrier reef in the continental United States.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/07/31/july-hottest-month-extreme-weather-future/