Reichelt added: “You rule by surveillance. You wouldn't be president without surveillance. You monitor everything, every citizen, but you refuse to monitor the diseased wet markets in your country. You shut down every newspaper and website that is critical of your rule, but not the stalls where bat soup is sold. You are not only monitoring your people, you are endangering them – and with them, the rest of the world.”
------------
Fox News has reported that sources are saying there's increasing confidence that the coronavirus pandemic began in a Wuhan, China, laboratory as part of the Communist country's efforts to compete with the United States.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-germanys-bild-in-war-of-words-after-newspaper-scorched-xi-over-coronavirus
Of course that's what they are reporting.
And you accuse others of being led by the nose.
It would be funny if it were so tragically predictable.
But... it's not even new news.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/politics/us-intelligence-virus-started-chinese-lab/index.html - 6 days ago.
And
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-wuhan-lab-complicated-origins.html - 3 days ago. "Here's the science."
or
https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinas-bats-expert-says-her-wuhan-lab-wasnt-source-of-new-coronavirus-11587463204Of course, it is hardly a shock that she would deny responsibility, but when multiple teams independently look at it and come to the same conclusion based on the genomics, it sure makes it sound more likely that it did not come from her lab.
It's no more likely that it came from there than that it was planted there by some agent to make China look bad.
And I don't believe that, either. I believe the scientists who say it is far more likely to have been naturally occurring and outside the lab.
Take yet another of your conspiracy theories and put it where it belongs - with your hydroxychoroquine!