Here's some of that appeasement that Bambi is lying about:
https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/05/us/buffalo-police-suspension-shoving-man-trnd/index.html
Based on the initial video, police issued a statement that said Gugino tripped and fell, police spokesman Mike DeGeorge told CNN.
After more videos became available, police amended that statement, and Buffalo Police Commissioner Byron Lockwood suspended the officers without pay and opened an investigation, he said.
"The department moved swiftly" and "corrected" the information, DeGeorge said.
But it's not just that they pushed over the 75 year old man without cause or need to do so, regardless of his having refused to leave (assuming he was told to).
It's that as he lay there, his head bleeding, after the push, the rest of the police stood around doing nothing.
They are to protect even those vicious 75 year olds who insist on violently standing in their way. They failed to come even close to that standard.
It was after curfew, he should've obeyed the law and been at home.
Take on riot cops, you take your chances.
I saw the video. There was no need to push him as hard as one cop did...but, there's war on the streets, people are hyped up, going into violent battle.
You could always blame the violent protesters.
As soon as they saw the man bleeding the cops should've called an ambulance.
So, the cops broke the law, but you defends them, because the other people broke the law?
Blame the violent protesters, none of whom are in the video?
"Take on riot cops, and you take your chances," because the riot cops are out of control and lawless?!
THAT is your argument?!
Yes, they should have called an ambulance. And they should have used their training to see to him. But they didn't.
Your argument is that we should appease the violent, lawless police.
I get it.
We'd hope you could understand that nobody is rushing to appease violent protesters.
But we would hope much. You have shown a world class ability to ignore facts and reality.