I'd hate to burst the self-imposed bubble you've been jerking off in, but I seem to remember Rasmussen predicting the final Gen Election tally within 1% in 2016 while every other major pollster was WAAAAY off.
Well then you remember wrong.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/polls.html
This is your cue to double down
Sure, I'll take that cue, as there is nothing in that link that is surprising to me, nor does it contradict what I said. Poll averages were about a point off the final tally. While Rasmussen happened to get the final percentage of the overall vote right, it isn't because it was some kind of outlier, with other polling being way off. Just isn't the case.
And certainly does not make the case that Rasmussen is so reliably on-point that it is worth using its polls exclusively while ignoring the others.
Yesterday's Trump approvals:
Gallup 42% Approve, 56 % Disapprove
Reuters 42% Approve, 56% Disapprove
Politico/Morning Consult 38% Approve, 60% Disapprove
Economist/YouGove 45% Approve, 54% Disapprove
Rasmussen 52% Approve, 46% Disapprove
Rasmussen was so great in 2016 that it justifies that kind of outlier? No. Thats a myth, often repeated here by kiidcarter8, despite it being pointed out to him that there is no evidence to support it.
And for more recent evidence, look at 2018, when Rasmussen not only failed to predict the Blue Wave, they had Republicans up:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/2018_generic_congressional_vote-6185.htmlUnquestionably the worst performing poll that year. Personally, I think their polls are garbage. If you wan't to include them as part of an average of other polling, ok, suit yourself.
But if you are using their polls to the exclusion of all others, you are doing so because you aren't actually interested in knowing what is going on, but looking for info that makes you feel good.