What do you think the odds are that Republicans hire only the "bad" health people, while Biden will find and hire the "good"?
Child.
First off, Trump made lots of bad and terrible hires and then fired them and trashed them on the way out.
Secondly, it's not that Fauci or Birx were necessarily bad, it's just that they got steamrolled and weren't up to the task of defending science in the wake of Trump's anti-science assault. They made mistakes (especially with regards to masks; and were cowed by Trump). They are tainted and need replacing. Fauci will be 80 before Biden starts.
Now Scott Atlas, he goes directly into the bad category. But he was never a serious epidemiologist or public health expert, just a hack who supported fringe policies of doing nothing/herd immunity which provided cover for Trump.
Jerome Adams was a non-entity. Redfield incompetent and in over his head. Azar useless.
The question for you is
why did Trump sideline his initial CV team of Redfield. Azar, Adams? And then later
why did Trump marginalized Birx (who was disappeared) and muzzled Fauci (not allowed on TV)?
Basically Trump politicized every aspect of the Virus and its handling to the detriment of the country. Pence and Jared seem to be the main advisors on CV-19.
In short, Biden will choose competent experts and follow the science.
Not political hacks. And won't muzzle and sideline experts.
So half of it is HOW Biden will use health experts.
And the other half is Biden won't pick partisan outlier hacks such as Atlas.
A much more thorough and considered response than your childish post merited.
Idiot.