And her bonafides as a racist, revisionist historian of the Civil War who supports the Lost Cause are demonstrated anew for all to see.
Being a racist doesn't preclude one from serving in Congress
You are representing your constituents, who have voted their approval. Yes, even racists have unalienable rights.
Is more than half the voting public in MS racist? Likely not. So she has other qualities, stances on issues they see as likeable.
Nor does being a racist preclude one from being president.
Or posting on this message board, as you and a couple others show repeatedly.
She hasn't gotten more than half the vote yet, Kiiid, so your conclusion seems premature.
But even if your "likely not" were true (which is untested), there is a good chance she will win because of her quality of having an (R) next to her name, rather than because they have the foggiest where she stands on issues apart from racism.
Overall, your comment smacks of a darker version of that said about Harrold Carswell by then Senator Hruska:
Even if he were mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.
Carswell was a racist, too.
He got rejected. Perhaps she will, as well. It would be refreshing to see.
I don't actually think that racists are entitled to representation of their views in the U.S. Senate.
I am hardly surprised to hear that you think otherwise.