I will note, as I do from time to time, that DimBulbWard continues to make claims about others, while providing neither substantiation for why the Dems have double standards nor for why his own amorality is actually rooted in some sort of truly moral path.
No examples, just lies, denial, and obfuscation.
Actually definitions.
I provided actual definitions.
As usual, you don't provide your own. Buffoon.
Here, have some more:
1a : having or showing no concern about whether behavior is morally right or wrong
b : being neither moral nor immoral
specifically : lying outside the sphere to which moral judgments apply
2 : being outside or beyond the moral order or a particular code of morals
That was Merriam-Webster.
1. not to be judged by criteria of morality; neither moral nor immoral
2. without moral sense or principles; incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong
Collins. Now let's look at the Oxford Dictionary.
Lacking a moral sense; unconcerned with the rightness or wrongness of something.
MacMillian?
someone who is amoral does not care whether or not their behavior is morally right
Cambridge:
without moral principles
That one is less than helpful, I suppose. Here's their definition of moral:
relating to standards of good behavior, honesty, and fair dealing, or showing high standards of this type
I think that pretty well settles it.
The GOP is not
fair, as evidenced in their repeated efforts to prevent people from voting. Their conduct over Garland, over the rules of governance in NC and Wisconsin are thoroughly unfair. And their reactions to the racists in their party and other bigots illustrates their low standards, among many other things.
And you?
You turn a blind eye to it. You deny the racism. You simply do not comment on most of it.
Because your standards and morality align with your party's. Whatever works. Russian involvement in the election? "We won." Bigots in the House and Senate? "Get rid of them by voting." Racist gerrymandering? "What evidence?"
Amoral.
Lie, deny, and obfuscate.