Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[josh]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

And your bullshit opinion of Clinton's view must keep you aroused, like any other sexual fantasies you engage in. But you needn't share them with us - we just don't care about your wet dreams.

[josh]

First, "Information on the Biden's gotten through whatever means" is of course very problematic as you have no idea how or who is providing that "info" and how accurate it is. 


Is the Biden info (is the claim that it is) inaccurate?

That is always weaker than, "yeah, I did it - get over it"

There is no Biden info, Kid. There are allegations from Giuliani, Trump, et al. There is no evidence to support the allegations. There is no direct testimony to support it, either.

This was and is all a red herring to try to tarnish Joe Biden anyway the President could find to do it.

So that's a yes?

That's a "you've asked a question that is wrong." The rumor is wrong.

There is no Biden info. The claim that there is info about the Bidens being engaged in nefarious actions is inaccurate.

Can you manage to follow that?

You might be advised to follow the actions of the Biden family.

I have no interest in either making money in Europe or being Veep. Having a brother die has some appeal.

And following in Uncle Joe's actions with women doesn't seem like my line, either.

By the way, this is where Kid would chastise one of us for answering a comment that was not for them. It's fine with me if you want to be a jerk in these instances, too.

[REDSTATEWARD]

First, "Information on the Biden's gotten through whatever means" is of course very problematic as you have no idea how or who is providing that "info" and how accurate it is. 


Is the Biden info (is the claim that it is) inaccurate?

That is always weaker than, "yeah, I did it - get over it"

There is no Biden info, Kid. There are allegations from Giuliani, Trump, et al. There is no evidence to support the allegations. There is no direct testimony to support it, either.

This was and is all a red herring to try to tarnish Joe Biden anyway the President could find to do it.

So that's a yes?

That's a "you've asked a question that is wrong." The rumor is wrong.

There is no Biden info. The claim that there is info about the Bidens being engaged in nefarious actions is inaccurate.

Can you manage to follow that?

You might be advised to follow the actions of the Biden family.

I have no interest in either making money in Europe or being Veep. Having a brother die has some appeal.

And following in Uncle Joe's actions with women doesn't seem like my line, either.

By the way, this is where Kid would chastise one of us for answering a comment that was not for them. It's fine with me if you want to be a jerk in these instances, too.

No need. You missed my point. And no one on here can out jerk you.

[kiidcarter8]

You think he’s gonna replicate that in 2020 then you’re cray.


I really don't know - but have seen no real reason thus far to think not

[josh]

First, "Information on the Biden's gotten through whatever means" is of course very problematic as you have no idea how or who is providing that "info" and how accurate it is. 


Is the Biden info (is the claim that it is) inaccurate?

That is always weaker than, "yeah, I did it - get over it"

There is no Biden info, Kid. There are allegations from Giuliani, Trump, et al. There is no evidence to support the allegations. There is no direct testimony to support it, either.

This was and is all a red herring to try to tarnish Joe Biden anyway the President could find to do it.

So that's a yes?

That's a "you've asked a question that is wrong." The rumor is wrong.

There is no Biden info. The claim that there is info about the Bidens being engaged in nefarious actions is inaccurate.

Can you manage to follow that?

You might be advised to follow the actions of the Biden family.

I have no interest in either making money in Europe or being Veep. Having a brother die has some appeal.

And following in Uncle Joe's actions with women doesn't seem like my line, either.

By the way, this is where Kid would chastise one of us for answering a comment that was not for them. It's fine with me if you want to be a jerk in these instances, too.

No need. You missed my point. And no one on here can out jerk you.

Back to "I know you are, but what am I?" for your retorts, again?

As Kid would say, "Weak."

[josh]

How crazed is Giuliani about Joe Biden at this point?

He butt-dialed a reporter and left a message fuming about Biden, by accident.

When asked about his comments in the message on the Bidens, Giuliani said that he was referencing the "strong case that exists about four decades of the Biden family stealing money."

[/size]

Either he thinks that Beau and Hunter started when they were 10 and 9 or he thinks Joe was stealing money back then.  If it's the latter, he sure hasn't bothered looking at the record the Bidens have, which is hilarious given the Trump record on money over those four decades!

[kiidcarter8]

Inquiry is legal.

GOP is fucked ten ways from Sunday

Ummm..

we are in the White House

[REDSTATEWARD]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

Like what?

[Hairy Lime]

Inquiry is legal.

GOP is fucked ten ways from Sunday

Ummm..

we are in the White House

For now.

[josh]

Inquiry is legal.

GOP is fucked ten ways from Sunday

Ummm..

we are in the White House

Which is why the American public is fucked ten ways from Sunday.

Good point, Kid.

[josh]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

Like what?

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

#22448 and #22449 are the two most recent examples. They are hardly alone. That you cannot be bothered to look for any is unsurprising.

[REDSTATEWARD]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

Like what?

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

#22448 and #22449 are the two most recent examples. They are hardly alone. That you cannot be bothered to look for any is unsurprising.

ROFL!

[josh]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

Like what?

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

#22448 and #22449 are the two most recent examples. They are hardly alone. That you cannot be bothered to look for any is unsurprising.

ROFL!

Thank you for picking up all the dust.

And I gather that means you still can't read.

[REDSTATEWARD]

She has given zero indication she is running


Eh....

Not so true, I'd say

Has she formed an exploratory committee? Raised money? Gone to the Iowa State Fair? She has done this twice on her own, and twice more with her husband. She knows what it takes to run.

Sure she does. Ownership of the DNC. That’s all she needs and what she has.
Once impeachment of Trump inevitably fails the dems are faced with a choice of socialist candidates who will be soundly rejected by general election voters. That leaves Hillary with Bernie heading to a Green Party Ticket .  Exit the democrat party as we know it and GOP rule for 2-3 more Presidential cycles.

Your wet dreams have no counterpart in objective reality.

LOL!
Hillary’s view is she is still the only alternative to a party takeover with a socialist agenda that America will never tolerate. I find it telling that neither you nor the other Trump haters on here can say anything in support of any of the announced candidates.

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

Like what?

I find it telling that you cannot recognize when things have been said in support of some of the announced candidates.

It's as if you have selective vision, Ward. Plenty has been said.

#22448 and #22449 are the two most recent examples. They are hardly alone. That you cannot be bothered to look for any is unsurprising.

ROFL!

Thank you for picking up all the dust.

And I gather that means you still can't read.

LOL.  22448-49 make my point.

[LarryBnDC]

You think he’s gonna replicate that in 2020 then you’re cray.


I really don't know - but have seen no real reason thus far to think not

You’re counting on voter suppression, Russians and a third party candidate to draw Democratic votes?


Really?