Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[oilcan]

He has more problems than you can shake a stick at.

Or a narwhal tusk at.

[oilcan]

So black women only vote for black women when they are in a political race?

Kid Carter (we could start changing one letter in your name, too, but I'll hold off on the chance it's a typo....odd that you make that typo every time) is a political pundit.

ToddlerCarter8 is a Trumpist white nationalist whose political punditry is one part fan fiction and two parts straight racism.

Who is your wife voting for now that Harris is "sadly" no longer a candidate?

Did someone drop you on your head?

[josh]

https://www.democracynow.org/2019/11/25/headlines/coal_industry_knew_burning_fossil_fuels_causes_climate_change_as_early_as_1966?fbclid=IwAR2eDF-zHAtKv2UsB6QAKnzzNqXdBwj20bB0lMVzVdG-uC34yombrel3uS8

1966.

The Coal industry knew.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

1977

Exxon knew.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/shell-grappled-with-climate-change-20-years-ago-documents-show/

1998

Shell figured it out.

2019

Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change. Ward still thinks it can be responded to by half-measures.

And the GOP "leadership" which knows the truth continues to pretend they don't because it would disrupt their wealth and their power.

[kiidcarter8]

Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change.


heh

[josh]

Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change.


heh

"heh"

"lol"

"You have to stop."

"Fake news."

Kid is a man of few words and even less meaning.

[NeedsAdjustments]

So black women only vote for black women when they are in a political race?

Kid Carter (we could start changing one letter in your name, too, but I'll hold off on the chance it's a typo....odd that you make that typo every time) is a political pundit.

ToddlerCarter8 is a Trumpist white nationalist whose political punditry is one part fan fiction and two parts straight racism.

Who is your wife voting for now that Harris is "sadly" no longer a candidate?

I have no idea why you assume that is relevant to your racist punditry.

For the non-idiots on the board:

I liked Harris, and liked the idea of Trump having to go up against a talented prosecutor who would hold his criminal ass to the fire.

But it was pretty clear from the start that she wasn't able to make an instinctive connection with people.  Notably, the attempts at humor usually fell flat. 

Even a total wonk like Warren can speak to the everyman.  Something Harris needs to work on if she wants to take this another round.

A round ToddlerCarter8 hopes Don Jr. runs in so that his racist white male vote finds another safe harbor after it so enjoyed four years of Trump.

[josh]

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/12/03/former-gop-house-intel-report-trump-allegations-vpx.cnn

Kid and Ward keep drinking Trump's (and Putin's) Kool-aid.

Or perhaps they are spitting it out in an effort to put out the fire caused by the truth of what Trump has done and who he is.

[NeedsAdjustments]

Huh.  So the "No Quid Pro Quo!" call, memorably scribbled down by the "president" before barking about it to the press but already a laughably transparent defense, probably never even happened:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/03/politics/witness-testimony-casts-doubt-on-trump-sondland-phone-call/index.html

Which begs the question: if Sondland was still trying to protect the "president" during testimony that already clearly implicated him in crimes, then how bad must the real story be?

[kiidcarter8]

But it was pretty clear from the start that she wasn't able to make an instinctive connection with people.  Notably, the attempts at humor usually fell flat.


ya think?

Should be interesting to find out where all the campaign cash went

Out before Iowa?  Before some things could be discovered, likely

Some real big $$ Cali donors are gonna want some answers.

But all things done to save the Senator's rep moving forward.

[NeedsAdjustments]

Should be interesting to find out where all the campaign cash went

Out before Iowa?  Before some things could be discovered, likely

Some real big $$ Cali donors are gonna want some answers.

ToddlerCarter8 reveals his rank ignorance again.

No mystery where unused campaign cash can go.  Clear guidance is provided by the law.

And yes, people who donate to campaigns do so with full knowledge that their candidate of choice might not win.

Dumbass.

[kiidcarter8]

No mystery where unused campaign cash can go.  Clear guidance is provided by the law.


And the used?

I am getting the impression there was no unused.

[NeedsAdjustments]

Huh.  So the "No Quid Pro Quo!" call, memorably scribbled down by the "president" before barking about it to the press but already a laughably transparent defense, probably never even happened:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/03/politics/witness-testimony-casts-doubt-on-trump-sondland-phone-call/index.html

Which begs the question: if Sondland was still trying to protect the "president" during testimony that already clearly implicated him in crimes, then how bad must the real story be?

Call records, btw, show multiple contacts between Nunes and Lev Parnas.  At least six, with one lasting almost 10 minutes.

[NeedsAdjustments]

No mystery where unused campaign cash can go.  Clear guidance is provided by the law.


And the used?

I am getting the impression there was no unused.

So where is the mystery, dumbass?  How campaign cash is used is a matter of FEC record.  You could get those records yourself, if you felt so inclined.

[josh]

No mystery where unused campaign cash can go.  Clear guidance is provided by the law.


And the used?

I am getting the impression there was no unused.

The used is spelled out in significant detail, dolt.

You can look it up when the quarterly filing is released.

The only place from which it is hard to track spending is Trump's inauguration fund, which was under investigation last I looked.

[kiidcarter8]

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/27/kamala-harris-black-women-progressives-support-record