It's not like that at all.
RedWard is genuinely concerned about the poor who need to work, and he's concerned about domestic abuse and drug use. He wants to lift restrictions so the poor can die quicker and avoid all those unpleasant pathologies.
Liberal democracy has always been hampered by its lack of Social Darwinists (who, again, should be called Social Spencerians). Just think, if Norman Borlaug hadn't gone to India in the sixties and figured out how to increase their grain crop, India would have kept its population at 400 million. And still be able to plow fields and gather harvests with oxen, in case of an oil shortage. Of course, they'd have had to skip mass literacy, prosperity, having a middle class, and not having mass famines every five years.