Adam Schiff, liar extradonaire
Starting in December 2017 Schiff boasted to CNN that collusion was a fact: “The Russians offered help, the (Trump ) campaign accepted.
The Russians gave help and the President made full use of that help
In April 2018, Mr. Schiff countered a release by Devin Nunez that its finding of no collusion “was unsupported by the facts and the investigative record by stating he (Schiff) had seen direct” empirical evidence of collusion.
Well here is what we know today AFTER the Mueller Report found NO evidence of a collusion :
James Clapper, former Director ofNational Intelligence “ I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign was plotting/conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.”
former Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch agreed that while she’d seen “concerning” information, “I don’t recall anything being briefed up to me.” Former Deputy AG Sally Yates concurred several weeks later: “We were at the fact-gathering stage here, not the conclusion stage.”
According to the Wall Street Journal the same goes for the FBI agents who started the collusion probe in 2016. Most remarkable, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted the bureau’s reason for opening the case was nonsense. Asked in December 2017 why the FBI obtained a secret surveillance warrant on former Trump aide Carter Page, rather than on George Papadopoulos (whose casual conversation with a foreign diplomat was the catalyst for the probe), Mr. McCabe responded: “Papadopoulos’ comment didn’t particularly indicate that he was the person that had had—that was interacting with the Russians.” No one else
All of which begs the question why would any responsible news organization believe anything Adam Schiff has to say about ANYTHING?