Lies, not cherry-picking, about conclusions of the report:
- "We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election." - Rubio
This is a lie. The report found that Manafort was working closely with a Russian Intelligence agent that was probably involved in the hacking operations. It also found that Stone was in contact with Wikileaks, and that Trump spoke to Stone about those contacts, then lied about it to Mueller.
All that is very clearly evidence of collusion. What the report actually said is that there isn't enough evidence to draw a clear conclusion of collusion. That, of course, is debatable.
"(The report) "proves -- yet again -- there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign."
That is a lie. Not even Rubio would make that claim, as a finding of no evidence of proof is not proof that the evidence doesn't exist. The report, in fact, shows that the campaign was motivated to collude and had the channels to do so. That is very much the opposite of what the Trump Campaign is saying.