Yep. People of Praise does share similarities in its doctrines to the People of Hope, and both are Charismatics. Either community excludes women from the highest leadership positions and teaches that men are the spiritual leaders of their families. So... tomayto, tomahto.
That answer doesn’t even rise to a LOL! it is so juvenile.
But at least the dems got another chance to don the HandMaiden costumes they bought for the Kavanaugh Cavalcade of lies.
You're not following at all. You post that Newsweek misreported that Atwood based her Gilead society on People of Praise, when it was a newspaper clipping on a different group called People of Hope. You implied that this somehow meant that the cultish comparison between Coney Barret's group and Atwood's Gilead was therefore invalid.
I pointed out that People of Praise, like People of Hope, also is a charismatic group which does not allow women in leadership positions and places the man as the spiritual leader of a family. And P of P also used to call women members "handmaidens, " only changing the name when the book was published and widely read. Therefore, your distinction, while it did show a magazine's error, was a distinction without a difference.
The two groups indeed share cultish sexist doctrines that would potentially cloud the impartiality of a SC justice.
Congrats. You now earned the LOL!
A 35 year old news report was misused as to the source of The HandMaiden’s Tale. But don’t let that ruin your narrative.
Never mind that People of Praise
allegedly oppresses, subjugates, and disempowers the women in its ranks so much that Barrett has been forced to become a federal judge.