I only watched Kamala defend Obamacare and then question Barrett.
For a law professor ACB didn't seem too sharp. She seemed to sense that Harris was leading to something but had trouble following the classic Socratic method (which teaching law supposedly employs). First you get someone to agree to one premise, then maybe another and finally spring the trap: If you agree with A & B then doesn't C logically follow. So ACB just acted peeved about having to answer fairly obvious questions, which she agreed with.
Of course it's obvious that replacing RBG with a Scalia acolyte is devastating to the liberal agenda. Barrett is a very religious person and Roe v Wade is doomed. Police will be empowered, criminal rights reduced. Businesses will be treated as minor deities. She seems average at best and at 48 is likely to be on the court for 30+ years.
The failure to defeat a complete ass in Donald Trump has had a lot of hugely negative consequences. A horrendous and deadly non-response to a pandemic.
Three right-wing Supreme Court justices. Most of the other policies should be able to be reversed, unless I'm forgetting something. Though the harm to the media's reputation, the re-ascendancy of racism, mainstreaming of conspiracies and alternative facts all will have lingering harmful effects.
You really have to wonder how a party that brings us W Bush and Trump manages to continue to exist and have supporters. Hopefully Biden understands that it's time to take the gloves off and reverse course drastically. Bare-knuckle time or get flattened like usual.