"Black Lives Matter" could be seen by some people as 'non-inclusive' and 'racist'.
"All Lives Matter" on the other hand could be seen as 'inclusive' and 'non-racist'.
Only if you don't understand context.
Context: Nobody said ONLY black lives matter. It's black lives matter TOO.
All Lives Matter is the refrain of either the a) outright racist, or b) the person who doesn't the context.
In October 2020 it's getting harder and harder to find anyone who is in the (b) camp.
Grant Napear (the broadcaster who resigned from the Kings broadcast) might have been in the B camp prior to his statement.
Now he knows better and has apologized.
And is likely unemployed. A total outrage.
He has a podcast.
They say "All Lives Matter" is racist, many people say it is not.
It is the tone-deaf response of racists and people who don't know the context of "black lives matter".
Black Lives Matter should be changed to All Lives Matter. Until it is it will be seen by many as 'separate' and 'non-inclusive'.
We need to specifically separate it --- in order to draw attention to it.
Think about "endangered species".
Why do we bother keeping a list of endangered species if all lives matter?
Because we need to draw attention to an at-risk population.
It could well look to some people that it's "Only Black Lives Matter".
Nobody has said that.
Nobody has said it's "Black lives matter too"...that I've seen anywhere written or spoken.
Consider yourself informed.
They?
The ones in plain sight who are doing all the talking.
On this subject you should do more listening than talking.