Instead, you've launched into the usual uberliberal kneejerk garbage you've posted here.
Yeah, that "uberliberal kneejerk garbage," like epigenetics, lead from gasoline, lead from pipes, and effects of pollution.
Damned uberliberal scientists.
Like I said. A diversion. You changed the topic because you really couldn't argue the author's points.
Why don't you go take a nice swim. Wellfleet is lovely this time of year.
Says the master of diversion.
You claimed uberliberal.
I disproved it.
You went back to your other bogus argument.
Why bogus?
Because I agreed with much of what he said, but disagreed with his conclusion. You figure since I disagreed with his conclusion, I must somehow have not address his points.
Utley, you can wear your underwear on your head or not. That's up to you.
But it sounds more like you should just chew on it.
It won't change that his conclusion that the only way to fix their problems is on their own.
Or that he's wrong.