Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[kiidcarter8]

con't;

"And if we catch you lying, you'd better watch out...because we'll do our best to have you chucked in prison!"

No slander charges filed. No libel charges filed.

Gee, I'm surprised.

Trump promised all sorts of suits, but his libel charges have gone nowhere, too.

heh

[barton]

Fuck. Numbers are numbers. Inevitable loss but with a month til midterms you can believe this won’t hurt the Dems.

Sure, and Joe McCarthy is an American hero.

And his lawyer was later Trump's lawyer!   (as well as lawyer to two of the Five Families of NY)

[barton]

Immortalized on the wall,  forgotten on the floor.

https://youtu.be/Q34z5dCmC4M

[REDSTATEWARD]

Fuck. Numbers are numbers. Inevitable loss but with a month til midterms you can believe this won’t hurt the Dems.

Sure, and Joe McCarthy is an American hero.

And his lawyer was later Trump's lawyer!   (as well as lawyer to two of the Five Families of NY)

Wanna try that one again?

[kiidcarter8]

https://twitter.com/Harlan/status/1049003207308075010

heh

[josh]

The ABA’s rating of Kavanaugh was the highest it could give.

Was. They are reexamining the question.

With cause.

And (c) The triumph of Trump came at the expense of honesty and openness, with resriction of the FBI investigation and an unwillingness to share the report with the American people because it shows that Kavanaugh lied to the Judiciary Committee.

One report printed. 46 pages. Shared with the US Senate at one reader per hour, one hour per readers.

  No FBI background reports of previous SCOTUS nominees have been released because they are confidential.

a) That agreement has been in place since 2009.
b) That is the usual course of events. These are not the usual course of events.
c) Previous SCOTUS nominees have not been accused of lying to Congress.
d) If we were only going by what happens to previous nominees, Merrick Garland would have gotten a hearing. He didn't. You may remember.

Previous SCOTUS nominees before this time around required a supermajority. But you don't care about that, either. Senators representing a minority of the citizens voted in a nominee disapproved of by a minority of the citizens. Congratulations. I hope you are proud that your liar is now seated.

[josh]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/07/world/climate-change-new-ipcc-report-wxc/index.html

10 years to get our climate changes well underway.

Or else.

[bambu-wisdom]

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/07/world/climate-change-new-ipcc-report-wxc/index.html

10 years to get our climate changes well underway.

Or else.

Many of the countries that signed the Paris agreement have 'tossed it in the bin'...reportedly.

[facilitatorn]

Bambi your news lies to you constantly. It’s as twisted as Russia and the shit Red and Kid use to feed their disease.

This is why Red is ignorant of simple shit like Roy Cohn.

Just a friendly heads up.

[REDSTATEWARD]

The ABA’s rating of Kavanaugh was the highest it could give.

Was. They are reexamining the question.

With cause.

And (c) The triumph of Trump came at the expense of honesty and openness, with resriction of the FBI investigation and an unwillingness to share the report with the American people because it shows that Kavanaugh lied to the Judiciary Committee.

One report printed. 46 pages. Shared with the US Senate at one reader per hour, one hour per readers.

  No FBI background reports of previous SCOTUS nominees have been released because they are confidential.

a) That agreement has been in place since 2009.

Untrue but irrelevant and immaterial

b) That is the usual course of events. These are not the usual course of events.

Only to you

c) Previous SCOTUS nominees have not been accused of lying to Congress.

Neither has Kavanaugh

d) If we were only going by what happens to previous nominees, Merrick Garland would have gotten a hearing. He didn't. You may remember.

Irrevelant  and immaterial to Kavanaugh

Previous SCOTUS nominees before this time around required a supermajority.

Then take it up with Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer

Senators representing a minority of the citizens voted in a nominee disapproved of by a minority of the citizens.

Read the Constitution.

[josh]

The ABA’s rating of Kavanaugh was the highest it could give.

Was. They are reexamining the question.

With cause.

And (c) The triumph of Trump came at the expense of honesty and openness, with resriction of the FBI investigation and an unwillingness to share the report with the American people because it shows that Kavanaugh lied to the Judiciary Committee.

One report printed. 46 pages. Shared with the US Senate at one reader per hour, one hour per readers.

  No FBI background reports of previous SCOTUS nominees have been released because they are confidential.

a) That agreement has been in place since 2009.

Untrue but irrelevant and immaterial

b) That is the usual course of events. These are not the usual course of events.

Only to you

c) Previous SCOTUS nominees have not been accused of lying to Congress.

Neither has Kavanaugh

d) If we were only going by what happens to previous nominees, Merrick Garland would have gotten a hearing. He didn't. You may remember.

Irrevelant  and immaterial to Kavanaugh

Previous SCOTUS nominees before this time around required a supermajority.

Then take it up with Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer

Senators representing a minority of the citizens voted in a nominee disapproved of by a minority of the citizens.

Read the Constitution.

a) Liar.
b) Liar.
c) Liar.
d) Wrong and sure, but it wouldn't have been to somebody as impartial as he claims to be.

No, speak to McConnell who vowed to gum up the works and the GOP that vowed to block all of Obama's appointments. You always want to start the problem part way through the sequence.

No, because if the filibuster were still there, that would not be the case. Note that this is the first time that fewer than half the people have been represented in the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice.

You cling to tradition when it suits your arguments and reject it when it doesn't. You are an unprincipled opportunist, just like the president.

No news.

Liar.

[facilitatorn]

As a mouth piece for a foreign adversary, Red is doing his sad cracker best.

[REDSTATEWARD]

The ABA’s rating of Kavanaugh was the highest it could give.

Was. They are reexamining the question.

With cause.

And (c) The triumph of Trump came at the expense of honesty and openness, with resriction of the FBI investigation and an unwillingness to share the report with the American people because it shows that Kavanaugh lied to the Judiciary Committee.

One report printed. 46 pages. Shared with the US Senate at one reader per hour, one hour per readers.

  No FBI background reports of previous SCOTUS nominees have been released because they are confidential.

a) That agreement has been in place since 2009.

Untrue but irrelevant and immaterial

b) That is the usual course of events. These are not the usual course of events.

Only to you

c) Previous SCOTUS nominees have not been accused of lying to Congress.

Neither has Kavanaugh

d) If we were only going by what happens to previous nominees, Merrick Garland would have gotten a hearing. He didn't. You may remember.

Irrevelant  and immaterial to Kavanaugh

Previous SCOTUS nominees before this time around required a supermajority.

Then take it up with Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer

Senators representing a minority of the citizens voted in a nominee disapproved of by a minority of the citizens.

Read the Constitution.

a) Liar.
b) Liar.
c) Liar.
d) Wrong and sure, but it wouldn't have been to somebody as impartial as he claims to be.

No, speak to McConnell who vowed to gum up the works and the GOP that vowed to block all of Obama's appointments. You always want to start the problem part way through the sequence.

No, because if the filibuster were still there, that would not be the case. Note that this is the first time that fewer than half the people have been represented in the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice.

You cling to tradition when it suits your arguments and reject it when it doesn't. You are an unprincipled opportunist, just like the president.

No news.

Liar.

I realize it is tough being the Global troll.
When he has to think for himself the answers are laughable.

[LarryBnDC]

The ABA’s rating of Kavanaugh was the highest it could give.

Was. They are reexamining the question.

With cause.

And (c) The triumph of Trump came at the expense of honesty and openness, with resriction of the FBI investigation and an unwillingness to share the report with the American people because it shows that Kavanaugh lied to the Judiciary Committee.

One report printed. 46 pages. Shared with the US Senate at one reader per hour, one hour per readers.

  No FBI background reports of previous SCOTUS nominees have been released because they are confidential.

a) That agreement has been in place since 2009.

Untrue but irrelevant and immaterial

b) That is the usual course of events. These are not the usual course of events.

Only to you

c) Previous SCOTUS nominees have not been accused of lying to Congress.

Neither has Kavanaugh

d) If we were only going by what happens to previous nominees, Merrick Garland would have gotten a hearing. He didn't. You may remember.

Irrevelant  and immaterial to Kavanaugh

Previous SCOTUS nominees before this time around required a supermajority.

Then take it up with Harry Reid and Chuck Schumer

Senators representing a minority of the citizens voted in a nominee disapproved of by a minority of the citizens.

Read the Constitution.

a) Liar.
b) Liar.
c) Liar.
d) Wrong and sure, but it wouldn't have been to somebody as impartial as he claims to be.

No, speak to McConnell who vowed to gum up the works and the GOP that vowed to block all of Obama's appointments. You always want to start the problem part way through the sequence.

No, because if the filibuster were still there, that would not be the case. Note that this is the first time that fewer than half the people have been represented in the appointment of a Supreme Court Justice.

You cling to tradition when it suits your arguments and reject it when it doesn't. You are an unprincipled opportunist, just like the president.

No news.

Liar.

I realize it is tough being the Global troll.
When he has to think for himself the answers are laughable.

You have an amusing tell. Whenever you know what you’re saying is total shift you ALWAYS use the word, “laughable.” Every damn time.

[luee]

Deplorable, HRC is besides herself again.