I see you can’t dispute the numbers.
I'm not trying to dispute the numbers. The intention of my post was simply stated. And your instinct to hide your sourcing (or pass off the analysis as your own) is odd.
On the point, yes, school choice is a major issue for minorities when far too many public schools remain effectively segregated. I personally support Charter Schools (though not vouchers) for this reason, and don't agree with the instinctual response of some progressives to oppose them.
I suspect its because they know (and are 100% correct in this) that Republicans' interest in "school choice" has next to nothing to do with a desire to better the education of minority children.
Really? What is the “ interest” then?
Republicans want to monetize “public”education...
Really? How do they do that?
Ask Betsy Devos, after all that was supposed to be why she was brought in to the administration. But now that you’ve lost the House the school choice charade could be over and done with...
Betsy Devos has nothing to do with funding of local k-12 school districts.
Nor does the US House of Representatives.
And there you expose the depths of your ignorance of the American education system, Redd.
Congratulations.
Overall, the Feds contribute about 8% of the public school budget, with variations on a state, district, and school level. While most of that comes from DoE, some comes from other places, like Agriculture (lunch) and HHS (Head Start!). But beyond that, there are programs like Title 1 and Javits grants and many more that arise from the federal budget each year.
There is money to fund private school tuition for the poor and charter schools, for example. Some of that comes in grants which the Secretary oversees, usually indirectly but not always - she does set the priorities.
Yes, Secretary DeVos has a say in school funding. So does the House.