Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[whiskeypriest]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

Sadly, Hilary is not the government, toad.

[REDSTATEWARD]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

Sadly, Hilary is not the government, toad.

How observant.
But unless Hillary answered the question the” government”( although none was specified)
Has nothing to.

[NeedsAdjustments]

REDSTATEWARD doesn't need to answer the questions he has been asked re: Russia's election interference.  His transparent dodges reflect his position in a more honest way than any attempted answers would.

[facilitatorn]

Red doesn’t need a legitimate government. A racist and sexist one is all he requires.

[Yankguy1]

Not that.  He just requires one that cuts his taxes.

[josh]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

[FlyingVProd]

Anaheim has a new transportation service with clean electric buses which carry passengers around Anaheim for free, and it has my Mother's name, FRAN...

https://rideart.org/fran/

I think it is cool. If you have someone with bad knees or whatever who cannot easily walk around or ride bicycles or whatever, then it is nice that Anaheim gives people free rides, and the buses are clean energy.

Salute,

Tony V.

[josh]

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-48077802

Climate emergency declared in Scotland.

[REDSTATEWARD]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

Did you even read the article?

[josh]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

Did you even read the article?

Is it that hard for you to answer the question?

[REDSTATEWARD]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

Did you even read the article?

Is it that hard for you to answer the question?

I was right. There is no question to answer.
Nothing could happen with any government without Hillary answering a question.

[LarryBnDC]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

Did you even read the article?

Is it that hard for you to answer the question?

I was right. There is no question to answer.
Nothing could happen with any government without Hillary answering a question.

Heckuva job, Brownie.

[josh]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/wisconsin-michigan-pennsylvania-election-hillary-clinton-hacked-manipulated-donald-trump-swing-a7433091.html

What if this were demonstrated to be true beyond a reasonable doubt?

What should the government's response be?

Notice the dateline

Wednesday 23 November 2016

Yes.

Now answer the question.

The question was never asked.

Gee, you quoted my question and you still think it wasn't asked?

Answer the queston: if it had been demonstrably proven beyond a reasonable doubt, what should the government have done about it?

That is a question for Hillary.

No, it is a question for all of us.

I wasn't asking what Clinton should have done nor what she thinks the government should have done, but what you think the government should have done.

I am still asking it.

Did you even read the article?

Is it that hard for you to answer the question?

I was right. There is no question to answer.
Nothing could happen with any government without Hillary answering a question.

Bullshit and more bullshit.

The discovery of wrongdoing itself propels action.

Your answer is that you only think the government should act if a Democrat got in by illegal machinations, but if a Republican gets in that way, it is fine with you.

Amoral hypocrite.

[josh]

we're number one!

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/02/these-are-the-world-s-healthiest-nations/

Not in health, though.

[kiidcarter8]

Just the most recent of Trump's lies:

"The baby is born; the mother meets with the doctor. They take care of the baby. They wrap the baby beautifully. Then the doctor & mother determine whether or not they will execute the baby."

There is a quality to these lies that are really unbelievably bold.  Just like Trump's lies about vaccination...so detailed, so personal, like it actually happened to him or that he has seen it, and every word of it completely untrue. 

So many questions, so here is another that will go unanswered:  How can someone lie to you like this and still retain some credibility in your mind?  Or is it that you actually think what Trump is saying here is happening?

Better question is do you think it never happens.