Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[REDSTATEWARD]

The "insult" was pointing out that the New York senator did not call pro-lifers racist and that you read it incorrectly. Behave as expected.

LOL.
She most certainly did.
But it is easier for you to deny she meant it instead of admitting they are not.

You seem to have problems with the phrase "akin to". You may want to look that up.

I think we really also need to be asking why Kirstin Gillibrand thinks pro-life people are anti-Semitic. 

Go for it then.
Let us know what you find out.

[LarryBnDC]

[whiskeypriest]

He Murdered 3 Muslim College Students, But No One Wanted To Call It A Hate Crime
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/north-carolina-muslim-murder-hate-crime_n_5d017ce4e4b0304a12096afe

[whiskeypriest]

So after 2 years of investigating Russian interference in our elections, Trump says he's ok with breaking the law and doing it again in 2020.

And the fucking Republicans are fucking silent.

They should be ashamed of their cowardice as they barter away our democracy.

What law is that?

The law against knowingly accepting something of value from foreign sources in a federal election campaign.

Let's see it.

Or you can describe what you feel it means.

52 USC 30121(a)(2).

[whiskeypriest]

Wonder how far this will get.

Kellyanne Conway Should Be Removed From Federal Office, Ethics Agency Says
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kellyanne-conway-hatch-act-removed-federal-service_n_5d027337e4b0dc17ef05e5d7

[barton]

Kid thinks Google is an early 20th century cartoon character, first named Barney.

[barton]

Wonder how far this will get.

Kellyanne Conway Should Be Removed From Federal Office, Ethics Agency Says
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kellyanne-conway-hatch-act-removed-federal-service_n_5d027337e4b0dc17ef05e5d7

Liberal Media Plot!!

[barton]

It's very simple:

When you apply the law to a Democrat, you are enforcing it.

When you apply the law to a Republican, you are "weaponizing" it.

When you excuse the President of breaking a law, you are "respecting the office."

When you criticize the President for breaking a law, you are a "partisan" who hates, and loves to play "gotcha."

[kiidcarter8]

So after 2 years of investigating Russian interference in our elections, Trump says he's ok with breaking the law and doing it again in 2020.

And the fucking Republicans are fucking silent.

They should be ashamed of their cowardice as they barter away our democracy.

What law is that?

The law against knowingly accepting something of value from foreign sources in a federal election campaign.

Let's see it.

Or you can describe what you feel it means.

Oh, fuck. Google.

Heh.  That's funny.  Google.

You and Steve do not know which law he is referring to, nor can you explain exactly how it was violated.  You are flying fucking BLIND!  But acting like someone with 20/10.

[Yankguy1]

Heh. 

[kiidcarter8]

Wonder how far this will get.

Kellyanne Conway Should Be Removed From Federal Office, Ethics Agency Says
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kellyanne-conway-hatch-act-removed-federal-service_n_5d027337e4b0dc17ef05e5d7

https://twitter.com/desiderioDC/status/1139202861018075137

[oilcan]

I didn't click, but, hey, are we now just posting Twitters as replies in a political discussion forum??


Also, erm, didn't Steve just post the exact law that Kid was challenging him to specify??  And Adjustman also posted another one.

TBH, I think you guys are being trolled, at this point.

[NeedsAdjustments]

So after 2 years of investigating Russian interference in our elections, Trump says he's ok with breaking the law and doing it again in 2020.

And the fucking Republicans are fucking silent.

They should be ashamed of their cowardice as they barter away our democracy.

What law is that?

The law against knowingly accepting something of value from foreign sources in a federal election campaign.

Let's see it.

Or you can describe what you feel it means.

Oh, fuck. Google.

Heh.  That's funny.  Google.

You and Steve do not know which law he is referring to, nor can you explain exactly how it was violated.  You are flying fucking BLIND!  But acting like someone with 20/10.

The law "Steve" is referring to has been widely discussed since news of the Russia Tower Meeting broke.

That you seem to think it obscure and are only hearing about it now is your own type of blindness.

[NeedsAdjustments]

Wonder how far this will get.

Kellyanne Conway Should Be Removed From Federal Office, Ethics Agency Says
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kellyanne-conway-hatch-act-removed-federal-service_n_5d027337e4b0dc17ef05e5d7

https://twitter.com/desiderioDC/status/1139202861018075137

Free Speech?

The Hatch Act is clear.  If the WH wants to argue it is unconstitutional, take it SCOTUS.

Until then, follow the law.

[kiidcarter8]

I didn't click

Please don't

but, hey, are we now just posting Twitters as replies in a political discussion forum??

Yep.  Sometimes.