I have zero desire to argue this, as the statement that the media was pro-Clinton in 2016 is so laughable that it really only deserves an "LOL." I will just say this:
Media mentions of Hillary Clinton's private email server far outstripped coverage of any other aspect of her campaign. By one study, it took 69 days for newspapers to grant her policy positions the same coverage that her emails got in 9. In a roundtable interview that was supposed to be centered around foreign policy, Matt Lauer spent the first nine minutes grilling Clinton over those emails.
All for good reason, right? Classified info, and all that?
But then we hear that as "president" Trump is doing business over unsecured cellphones. In fact, months into office he handed classified info directly to Russians! Security clearences were forced through for administration officials that should not have received them. Multiple advisors use personal email to conduct state business including his dauhter and brother in-law, who also, by the way, converses with foreign adversaries over WhatsApp. While Clinton complied with subpeonas to turn over private emails, Trump & Co. have refused to do the same.
And how much has a media that was completely obsessed with internet security protocol as the #1 issue covered these problems once Trump became "president?" What are the chances that any of this will be considered an issue going in to 2020?
Yeah, that media, so in Bill Clinton's pocket.
LOL.