I don't know if the fires in Brazil constitute a wise way to manage the Brazilian rain forest, nor to my knowledge does any one in Elba. But I find it funny that Red chooses one NYT story on the issue that presents the arsonists side and raises some questions, yet he has contiunually dismisssed so many other facts that satisfies about 97% of the scientific community about the reality of global warming and climate change.
Fact: Red's a fucking hard-on, a tiny hard-on, but a hard-on nonetheless.